Biotechnology
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisStock Comparison
JBIO vs KRYS vs RCUS vs IMVT vs ARQT
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
JBIO vs KRYS vs RCUS vs IMVT vs ARQT — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Biotechnology |
| Market Cap | $525M | $9.48B | $2.35B | $6.75B | $3.08B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $0.00 | $417M | $236M | $0.00 | $416M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-130M | $225M | $-369M | $-506M | $-2M |
| Gross Margin | — | 92.8% | 90.7% | — | 90.9% |
| Operating Margin | — | 42.8% | -168.6% | — | 0.8% |
| Forward P/E | — | 41.5x | — | — | 123.5x |
| Total Debt | $724K | $9M | $99M | $72K | $6M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $88M | $496M | $222M | $902M | $43M |
JBIO vs KRYS vs RCUS vs IMVT vs ARQT — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 21 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jade Biosciences, I… (JBIO) | 100 | 2.0 | -98.0% |
| Krystal Biotech, In… (KRYS) | 100 | 472.9 | +372.9% |
| Arcus Biosciences, … (RCUS) | 100 | 84.9 | -15.1% |
| Immunovant, Inc. (IMVT) | 100 | 311.1 | +211.1% |
| Arcutis Biotherapeu… (ARQT) | 100 | 90.1 | -9.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: JBIO vs KRYS vs RCUS vs IMVT vs ARQT
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
JBIO is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth is your priority.
- 141.8% revenue growth vs IMVT's -22.2%
KRYS carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- beta 0.98
- 29.2% 10Y total return vs IMVT's 230.5%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.98, Low D/E 0.8%, current ratio 9.95x
- Beta 0.98, current ratio 9.95x
RCUS ranks third and is worth considering specifically for momentum.
- +156.6% vs ARQT's +79.1%
IMVT lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
ARQT is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 91.3%, EPS growth 88.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 367.3%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 141.8% revenue growth vs IMVT's -22.2% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (41.5x vs 123.5x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 53.9% margin vs RCUS's -156.4% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.98 vs RCUS's 1.98, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 5 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +156.6% vs ARQT's +79.1% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 17.6% ROA vs IMVT's -62.2% |
JBIO vs KRYS vs RCUS vs IMVT vs ARQT — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
JBIO vs KRYS vs RCUS vs IMVT vs ARQT — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
KRYS leads in 4 of 6 categories
ARQT leads 1 • JBIO leads 0 • RCUS leads 0 • IMVT leads 0
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
KRYS leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
KRYS and IMVT operate at a comparable scale, with $417M and $0 in trailing revenue. KRYS is the more profitable business, keeping 53.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to RCUS's -156.4%. On growth, ARQT holds the edge at +60.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $0 | $417M | $236M | $0 | $416M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$134M | $185M | -$391M | -$532M | $6M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$130M | $225M | -$369M | -$506M | -$2M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$117M | $237M | -$489M | -$407M | $27M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | — | +92.8% | +90.7% | — | +90.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | — | +42.8% | -168.6% | — | +0.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | — | +53.9% | -156.4% | — | -0.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | — | +56.9% | -2.1% | — | +6.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +31.9% | -39.3% | — | +60.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +52.5% | +10.5% | -14.1% | +55.0% |
Valuation Metrics
ARQT leads this category, winning 2 of 4 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $525M | $9.5B | $2.3B | $6.8B | $3.1B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $437M | $9.0B | $2.2B | $5.8B | $3.0B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -3.96x | 47.01x | -7.08x | -11.87x | -189.15x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 41.48x | — | — | 123.51x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 53.57x | — | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | 24.36x | 9.50x | — | 8.18x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.52x | 7.90x | 3.97x | 7.04x | 16.51x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 50.18x | — | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
KRYS leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
KRYS delivers a 19.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $19 in annual profit, vs $-69 for RCUS. IMVT carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to RCUS's 0.16x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), KRYS scores 5/9 vs RCUS's 0/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -51.3% | +19.3% | -69.0% | -68.2% | -1.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -47.3% | +17.6% | -35.3% | -62.2% | -0.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -59.2% | +18.0% | -64.1% | — | -5.2% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -55.4% | +14.8% | -42.1% | -68.3% | -4.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 5 | 0 | 2 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.00x | 0.01x | 0.16x | 0.00x | 0.03x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$88M | -$487M | -$123M | -$902M | -$37M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $88M | $496M | $222M | $902M | $43M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $724,000 | $9M | $99M | $72,000 | $6M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | — | -13.38x | — | 2.08x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
KRYS leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in KRYS five years ago would be worth $49,430 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $231 for JBIO. Over the past 12 months, RCUS leads with a +156.6% total return vs ARQT's +79.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors KRYS at 35.5% vs JBIO's -67.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +13.6% | +30.2% | +0.0% | +26.9% | -15.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +128.7% | +130.3% | +156.6% | +103.6% | +79.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -96.6% | +148.8% | +15.9% | +51.6% | +140.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -97.7% | +394.3% | -6.4% | +207.0% | -13.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -97.7% | +2922.0% | +37.1% | +230.5% | +12.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -67.7% | +35.5% | +5.0% | +14.9% | +34.0% |
Risk & Volatility
KRYS leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
KRYS is the less volatile stock with a 0.98 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than RCUS's 1.98 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. KRYS currently trades 98.6% from its 52-week high vs JBIO's 57.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.61x | 0.98x | 1.98x | 1.67x | 1.49x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $27.96 | $325.95 | $28.72 | $36.27 | $31.77 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $6.57 | $127.99 | $7.91 | $14.32 | $12.72 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +57.5% | +98.6% | +81.1% | +90.6% | +77.4% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 26.8 | 59.9 | 39.3 | 51.9 | 59.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 813K | 261K | 1.1M | 1.9M | 1.5M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: JBIO as "Buy", KRYS as "Buy", RCUS as "Buy", IMVT as "Buy", ARQT as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 174.9% upside for JBIO (target: $44) vs 1.4% for KRYS (target: $326).
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $44.20 | $326.20 | $31.17 | $43.67 | $34.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 4 | 17 | 18 | 23 | 12 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
KRYS leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). ARQT leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics).
JBIO vs KRYS vs RCUS vs IMVT vs ARQT: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is JBIO or KRYS or RCUS or IMVT or ARQT a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Arcutis Biotherapeutics, Inc.
(ARQT) is the stronger pick with 91. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -4. 3% for Arcus Biosciences, Inc. (RCUS). Krystal Biotech, Inc. (KRYS) offers the better valuation at 47. 0x trailing P/E (41. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Jade Biosciences, Inc. (JBIO) a "Buy" — based on 4 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — JBIO or KRYS or RCUS or IMVT or ARQT?
On forward P/E, Krystal Biotech, Inc.
is actually cheaper at 41. 5x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — JBIO or KRYS or RCUS or IMVT or ARQT?
Over the past 5 years, Krystal Biotech, Inc.
(KRYS) delivered a total return of +394. 3%, compared to -97. 7% for Jade Biosciences, Inc. (JBIO). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: KRYS returned +29. 2% versus JBIO's -97. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — JBIO or KRYS or RCUS or IMVT or ARQT?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Krystal Biotech, Inc.
(KRYS) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 98β versus Arcus Biosciences, Inc. 's 1. 98β — meaning RCUS is approximately 102% more volatile than KRYS relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Immunovant, Inc. (IMVT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 16% for Arcus Biosciences, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — JBIO or KRYS or RCUS or IMVT or ARQT?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Arcutis Biotherapeutics, Inc.
(ARQT) is pulling ahead at 91. 3% versus -4. 3% for Arcus Biosciences, Inc. (RCUS). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Krystal Biotech, Inc. grew EPS 128. 0% year-over-year, compared to -4. 8% for Arcus Biosciences, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, ARQT leads at 367. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — JBIO or KRYS or RCUS or IMVT or ARQT?
Krystal Biotech, Inc.
(KRYS) is the more profitable company, earning 52. 6% net margin versus -142. 9% for Arcus Biosciences, Inc. — meaning it keeps 52. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: KRYS leads at 41. 5% versus -156. 3% for RCUS. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — RCUS leads at 96. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is JBIO or KRYS or RCUS or IMVT or ARQT more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Krystal Biotech, Inc.
(KRYS) trades at 41. 5x forward P/E versus 123. 5x for Arcutis Biotherapeutics, Inc. — 82. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for JBIO: 174. 9% to $44. 20.
08Which pays a better dividend — JBIO or KRYS or RCUS or IMVT or ARQT?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is JBIO or KRYS or RCUS or IMVT or ARQT better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Krystal Biotech, Inc.
(KRYS) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 98)). Arcus Biosciences, Inc. (RCUS) carries a higher beta of 1. 98 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (KRYS: +29. 2%, RCUS: +37. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between JBIO and KRYS and RCUS and IMVT and ARQT?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: JBIO is a small-cap quality compounder stock; KRYS is a small-cap high-growth stock; RCUS is a small-cap quality compounder stock; IMVT is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ARQT is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.