JBS vs WMT

For growth investors, JBS N.

V. (JBS) is the stronger pick with 14. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 4. 7% for Walmart Inc. (WMT). JBS N. V. (JBS) offers the better valuation at 2. 6x trailing P/E (10. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate JBS N. V. (JBS) a "Buy" — based on 3 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

On trailing P/E, JBS N.

V. (JBS) is the cheapest at 2. 6x versus Walmart Inc. at 47. 7x. On forward P/E, JBS N. V. is actually cheaper at 10. 5x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: JBS N. V. wins at 0. 15x versus Walmart Inc. 's 4. 06x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.

Over the past 5 years, Walmart Inc.

(WMT) delivered a total return of +186. 9%, compared to +45. 9% for JBS N. V. (JBS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: WMT returned +499. 5% versus JBS's +49. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Walmart Inc.

(WMT) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 12β versus JBS N. V. 's 0. 47β — meaning JBS is approximately 302% more volatile than WMT relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Walmart Inc. (WMT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 67% versus 3% for JBS N. V. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), JBS N.

V. (JBS) is pulling ahead at 14. 6% versus 4. 7% for Walmart Inc. (WMT). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: JBS N. V. grew EPS 1514% year-over-year, compared to 13. 3% for Walmart Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, WMT leads at 5. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

Walmart Inc.

(WMT) is the more profitable company, earning 3. 1% net margin versus 2. 3% for JBS N. V. — meaning it keeps 3. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: JBS leads at 5. 7% versus 4. 2% for WMT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — WMT leads at 24. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, JBS N. V. (JBS) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 15x versus Walmart Inc. 's 4. 06x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, JBS N. V. (JBS) trades at 10. 5x forward P/E versus 44. 7x for Walmart Inc. — 34. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for JBS: 19. 4% to $19. 50.

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

JBS N. V. (JBS) offers the highest yield at 2. 5%, versus 0. 7% for Walmart Inc. (WMT).

For long-horizon retirement investors, Walmart Inc.

(WMT) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 12), 0. 7% yield, +499. 5% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (WMT: +499. 5%, JBS: +49. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

Both stocks operate in the Consumer Defensive sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: JBS is a mid-cap deep-value stock; WMT is a mega-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.