Paper, Lumber & Forest Products
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
JCTC vs FENC vs UFPI vs LCTX
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Biotechnology
Paper, Lumber & Forest Products
Biotechnology
JCTC vs FENC vs UFPI vs LCTX — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Paper, Lumber & Forest Products | Biotechnology | Paper, Lumber & Forest Products | Biotechnology |
| Market Cap | $7M | $194M | $4.76B | $333M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $41M | $39M | $6.19B | $15M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-7M | $-7M | $264M | $-64M |
| Gross Margin | 4.5% | 93.1% | 16.6% | 99.0% |
| Operating Margin | -16.4% | -12.0% | 5.4% | -251.6% |
| Forward P/E | — | 53.8x | 15.9x | — |
| Total Debt | $2M | $19M | $230M | $2M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $226K | $27M | $925M | $41M |
JCTC vs FENC vs UFPI vs LCTX — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Sep 24 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jewett-Cameron Trad… (JCTC) | 100 | 41.2 | -58.8% |
| Fennec Pharmaceutic… (FENC) | 100 | 138.0 | +38.0% |
| UFP Industries, Inc. (UFPI) | 100 | 63.9 | -36.1% |
| Lineage Cell Therap… (LCTX) | 100 | 151.3 | +51.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: JCTC vs FENC vs UFPI vs LCTX
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
JCTC is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if sleep-well-at-night and defensive is your priority.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.71, Low D/E 10.1%, current ratio 4.63x
- Beta 0.71, current ratio 4.63x
- Beta 0.71 vs FENC's 1.77
FENC is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 123.7%, EPS growth 97.3%
- 123.7% revenue growth vs JCTC's -12.4%
UFPI carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 13 yrs, beta 0.92, yield 1.7%
- 230.6% 10Y total return vs FENC's -42.5%
- Better valuation composite
- 4.3% margin vs LCTX's -436.5%
LCTX is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +208.6% vs JCTC's -47.6%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 123.7% revenue growth vs JCTC's -12.4% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 4.3% margin vs LCTX's -436.5% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.71 vs FENC's 1.77 | |
| Dividends | 1.7% yield; 13-year raise streak; the other 3 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +208.6% vs JCTC's -47.6% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 6.5% ROA vs LCTX's -62.8%, ROIC 11.4% vs -141.9% |
JCTC vs FENC vs UFPI vs LCTX — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
JCTC vs FENC vs UFPI vs LCTX — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
UFPI leads in 3 of 6 categories
JCTC leads 0 • FENC leads 0 • LCTX leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — UFPI and LCTX each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
UFPI is the larger business by revenue, generating $6.2B annually — 425.0x LCTX's $15M. UFPI is the more profitable business, keeping 4.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to LCTX's -4.4%. On growth, LCTX holds the edge at +130.4% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $41M | $39M | $6.2B | $15M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$6M | -$5M | $498M | -$36M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$7M | -$7M | $264M | -$64M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$6M | -$8M | $298M | -$19M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +4.5% | +93.1% | +16.6% | +99.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -16.4% | -12.0% | +5.4% | -2.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -18.2% | -17.9% | +4.3% | -4.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -15.3% | -20.6% | +4.8% | -131.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -6.6% | +78.7% | -8.4% | +130.4% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -4.9% | +89.1% | -31.5% | +100.0% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — JCTC and FENC and UFPI each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, UFPI's 7.7x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than FENC's 55.3x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $7M | $194M | $4.8B | $333M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $9M | $186M | $4.1B | $295M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -1.75x | -431.25x | 16.77x | -4.89x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 53.78x | 15.92x | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 3.67x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 55.32x | 7.70x | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.17x | 4.07x | 0.75x | 22.88x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.35x | — | 1.60x | 7.27x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 7.18x | 17.24x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
UFPI leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
UFPI delivers a 8.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $8 in annual profit, vs $-135 for LCTX. LCTX carries lower financial leverage with a 0.06x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to JCTC's 0.10x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), FENC scores 6/9 vs JCTC's 1/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -44.0% | — | +8.4% | -134.5% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -31.9% | -15.0% | +6.5% | -62.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -13.2% | — | +11.4% | -141.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -16.4% | +9.0% | +10.2% | -36.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 1 | 6 | 4 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.10x | — | 0.07x | 0.06x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $2M | -$7M | -$695M | -$38M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $226,213 | $27M | $925M | $41M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $2M | $19M | $230M | $2M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | -1.57x | 43.92x | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
UFPI leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in FENC five years ago would be worth $11,183 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $4,628 for JCTC. Over the past 12 months, LCTX leads with a +208.6% total return vs JCTC's -47.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors UFPI at 2.1% vs JCTC's -22.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -13.9% | -10.2% | -8.6% | -16.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -47.6% | +12.9% | -12.0% | +208.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -53.7% | -13.2% | +6.3% | -8.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -53.7% | +11.8% | +1.5% | -50.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -53.7% | -42.5% | +230.6% | -51.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -22.7% | -4.6% | +2.1% | -2.8% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — JCTC and UFPI each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
JCTC is the less volatile stock with a 0.71 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than FENC's 1.77 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. UFPI currently trades 71.1% from its 52-week high vs JCTC's 51.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.71x | 1.77x | 0.92x | 1.53x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $4.02 | $9.92 | $118.00 | $2.09 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.54 | $5.65 | $80.06 | $0.42 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +51.0% | +69.6% | +71.1% | +65.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 65.7 | 58.9 | 35.6 | 39.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 17K | 176K | 379K | 1.2M |
Analyst Outlook
UFPI leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: FENC as "Buy", UFPI as "Buy", LCTX as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 160.9% upside for FENC (target: $18) vs 22.8% for UFPI (target: $103). UFPI is the only dividend payer here at 1.67% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $18.00 | $103.00 | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 7 | 8 | 5 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | +1.7% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | 13 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | $1.40 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.1% | +9.1% | 0.0% |
UFPI leads in 3 of 6 categories — strongest in Profitability & Efficiency and Total Returns. 3 categories are tied.
JCTC vs FENC vs UFPI vs LCTX: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is JCTC or FENC or UFPI or LCTX a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Fennec Pharmaceuticals Inc.
(FENC) is the stronger pick with 123. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -12. 4% for Jewett-Cameron Trading Company Ltd. (JCTC). UFP Industries, Inc. (UFPI) offers the better valuation at 16. 8x trailing P/E (15. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Fennec Pharmaceuticals Inc. (FENC) a "Buy" — based on 7 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — JCTC or FENC or UFPI or LCTX?
On forward P/E, UFP Industries, Inc.
is actually cheaper at 15. 9x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — JCTC or FENC or UFPI or LCTX?
Over the past 5 years, Fennec Pharmaceuticals Inc.
(FENC) delivered a total return of +11. 8%, compared to -53. 7% for Jewett-Cameron Trading Company Ltd. (JCTC). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: UFPI returned +230. 6% versus JCTC's -53. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — JCTC or FENC or UFPI or LCTX?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Jewett-Cameron Trading Company Ltd.
(JCTC) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 71β versus Fennec Pharmaceuticals Inc. 's 1. 77β — meaning FENC is approximately 149% more volatile than JCTC relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Lineage Cell Therapeutics, Inc. (LCTX) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 6% versus 10% for Jewett-Cameron Trading Company Ltd. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — JCTC or FENC or UFPI or LCTX?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Fennec Pharmaceuticals Inc.
(FENC) is pulling ahead at 123. 7% versus -12. 4% for Jewett-Cameron Trading Company Ltd. (JCTC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Fennec Pharmaceuticals Inc. grew EPS 97. 3% year-over-year, compared to -657. 1% for Jewett-Cameron Trading Company Ltd.. Over a 3-year CAGR, LCTX leads at -0. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — JCTC or FENC or UFPI or LCTX?
UFP Industries, Inc.
(UFPI) is the more profitable company, earning 4. 7% net margin versus -436. 5% for Lineage Cell Therapeutics, Inc. — meaning it keeps 4. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: UFPI leads at 5. 8% versus -251. 6% for LCTX. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — LCTX leads at 99. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is JCTC or FENC or UFPI or LCTX more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, UFP Industries, Inc.
(UFPI) trades at 15. 9x forward P/E versus 53. 8x for Fennec Pharmaceuticals Inc. — 37. 9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for FENC: 160. 9% to $18. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — JCTC or FENC or UFPI or LCTX?
In this comparison, UFPI (1.
7% yield) pays a dividend. JCTC, FENC, LCTX do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is JCTC or FENC or UFPI or LCTX better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, UFP Industries, Inc.
(UFPI) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 92), 1. 7% yield, +230. 6% 10Y return). Fennec Pharmaceuticals Inc. (FENC) carries a higher beta of 1. 77 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (UFPI: +230. 6%, FENC: -42. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between JCTC and FENC and UFPI and LCTX?
These companies operate in different sectors (JCTC (Basic Materials) and FENC (Healthcare) and UFPI (Basic Materials) and LCTX (Healthcare)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: JCTC is a small-cap quality compounder stock; FENC is a small-cap high-growth stock; UFPI is a small-cap deep-value stock; LCTX is a small-cap high-growth stock. UFPI pays a dividend while JCTC, FENC, LCTX do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.