Paper, Lumber & Forest Products
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
JCTC vs LIN vs APD vs UFPI vs ALB
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Chemicals - Specialty
Chemicals - Specialty
Paper, Lumber & Forest Products
Chemicals - Specialty
JCTC vs LIN vs APD vs UFPI vs ALB — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Paper, Lumber & Forest Products | Chemicals - Specialty | Chemicals - Specialty | Paper, Lumber & Forest Products | Chemicals - Specialty |
| Market Cap | $7M | $228.85B | $65.68B | $4.76B | $23.37B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $41M | $34.66B | $12.46B | $6.19B | $5.49B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-7M | $7.13B | $2.11B | $264M | $-233M |
| Gross Margin | 4.5% | 46.0% | 32.0% | 16.6% | 18.5% |
| Operating Margin | -16.4% | 28.8% | 18.4% | 5.4% | 5.6% |
| Forward P/E | — | 27.7x | 22.5x | 15.9x | 22.4x |
| Total Debt | $2M | $26.99B | $18.41B | $230M | $3.30B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $226K | $5.06B | $1.86B | $925M | $1.62B |
JCTC vs LIN vs APD vs UFPI vs ALB — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Sep 24 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jewett-Cameron Trad… (JCTC) | 100 | 41.2 | -58.8% |
| Linde plc (LIN) | 100 | 103.6 | +3.6% |
| Air Products and Ch… (APD) | 100 | 99.1 | -0.9% |
| UFP Industries, Inc. (UFPI) | 100 | 63.9 | -36.1% |
| Albemarle Corporati… (ALB) | 100 | 209.4 | +109.4% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: JCTC vs LIN vs APD vs UFPI vs ALB
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
JCTC is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.71, Low D/E 10.1%, current ratio 4.63x
LIN carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 3.0%, EPS growth 7.1%, 3Y rev CAGR 0.6%
- 375.2% 10Y total return vs ALB's 217.0%
- PEG 1.09 vs UFPI's 3.49
- 3.0% revenue growth vs JCTC's -12.4%
APD is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and defensive is your priority.
- Dividend streak 29 yrs, beta 0.45, yield 2.4%
- Beta 0.45, yield 2.4%, current ratio 1.38x
- 2.4% yield, 29-year raise streak, vs UFPI's 1.7%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
UFPI ranks third and is worth considering specifically for value.
- Lower P/E (15.9x vs 22.4x)
ALB is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +256.7% vs JCTC's -47.6%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 3.0% revenue growth vs JCTC's -12.4% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (15.9x vs 22.4x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 20.6% margin vs JCTC's -18.2% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.24 vs ALB's 1.60 | |
| Dividends | 2.4% yield, 29-year raise streak, vs UFPI's 1.7%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +256.7% vs JCTC's -47.6% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 8.3% ROA vs JCTC's -31.9%, ROIC 11.3% vs -13.2% |
JCTC vs LIN vs APD vs UFPI vs ALB — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
JCTC vs LIN vs APD vs UFPI vs ALB — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
LIN leads in 2 of 6 categories
UFPI leads 1 • APD leads 1 • JCTC leads 0 • ALB leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
LIN leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
LIN is the larger business by revenue, generating $34.7B annually — 851.8x JCTC's $41M. LIN is the more profitable business, keeping 20.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to JCTC's -18.2%. On growth, ALB holds the edge at +32.7% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $41M | $34.7B | $12.5B | $6.2B | $5.5B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$6M | $12.1B | $3.9B | $498M | $802M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$7M | $7.1B | $2.1B | $264M | -$233M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$6M | $5.1B | $1.1B | $298M | $577M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +4.5% | +46.0% | +32.0% | +16.6% | +18.5% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -16.4% | +28.8% | +18.4% | +5.4% | +5.6% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -18.2% | +20.6% | +16.9% | +4.3% | -4.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -15.3% | +14.7% | +8.9% | +4.8% | +10.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -6.6% | +8.2% | +8.8% | -8.4% | +32.7% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -4.9% | +13.4% | +141.1% | -31.5% | — |
Valuation Metrics
UFPI leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 16.8x trailing earnings, UFPI trades at a 50% valuation discount to LIN's 33.8x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), LIN offers better value at 1.33x vs UFPI's 3.67x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $7M | $228.8B | $65.7B | $4.8B | $23.4B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $9M | $250.8B | $82.2B | $4.1B | $25.1B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -1.75x | 33.85x | -166.67x | 16.77x | -34.50x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 27.67x | 22.46x | 15.92x | 22.36x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 1.33x | — | 3.67x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 19.75x | 119.66x | 7.70x | 33.21x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.17x | 6.73x | 5.46x | 0.75x | 4.55x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.35x | 5.82x | 3.79x | 1.60x | 2.39x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 44.97x | — | 17.24x | 33.76x |
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — LIN and UFPI each lead in 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
LIN delivers a 17.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $18 in annual profit, vs $-44 for JCTC. UFPI carries lower financial leverage with a 0.07x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to APD's 1.06x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), LIN scores 6/9 vs JCTC's 1/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -44.0% | +17.8% | +11.9% | +8.4% | -2.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -31.9% | +8.3% | +5.1% | +6.5% | -1.4% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -13.2% | +11.3% | -2.0% | +11.4% | +0.6% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -16.4% | +13.0% | -2.4% | +10.2% | +0.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 1 | 6 | 2 | 4 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.10x | 0.68x | 1.06x | 0.07x | 0.34x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $2M | $21.9B | $16.6B | -$695M | $1.7B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $226,213 | $5.1B | $1.9B | $925M | $1.6B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $2M | $27.0B | $18.4B | $230M | $3.3B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | 34.52x | 12.00x | 43.92x | 1.59x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
LIN leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in LIN five years ago would be worth $17,394 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $4,628 for JCTC. Over the past 12 months, ALB leads with a +256.7% total return vs JCTC's -47.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors LIN at 11.8% vs JCTC's -22.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -13.9% | +15.5% | +19.2% | -8.6% | +38.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -47.6% | +11.2% | +14.2% | -12.0% | +256.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -53.7% | +39.7% | +7.0% | +6.3% | +9.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -53.7% | +73.9% | +13.2% | +1.5% | +26.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -53.7% | +375.2% | +166.4% | +230.6% | +217.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -22.7% | +11.8% | +2.3% | +2.1% | +3.0% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — LIN and APD each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
LIN is the less volatile stock with a 0.24 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than ALB's 1.60 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. APD currently trades 96.0% from its 52-week high vs JCTC's 51.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.71x | 0.24x | 0.45x | 0.92x | 1.60x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $4.02 | $521.28 | $307.29 | $118.00 | $221.00 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.54 | $387.78 | $229.11 | $80.06 | $53.70 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +51.0% | +94.7% | +96.0% | +71.1% | +89.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 65.7 | 51.7 | 55.0 | 35.6 | 53.0 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 17K | 2.3M | 1.2M | 379K | 2.0M |
Analyst Outlook
APD leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: LIN as "Buy", APD as "Buy", UFPI as "Buy", ALB as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 22.8% upside for UFPI (target: $103) vs -3.8% for ALB (target: $191). For income investors, APD offers the higher dividend yield at 2.41% vs ALB's 0.82%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $539.71 | $312.78 | $103.00 | $190.80 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 28 | 42 | 8 | 45 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +1.2% | +2.4% | +1.7% | +0.8% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 6 | 29 | 13 | 15 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $6.00 | $7.11 | $1.40 | $1.62 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +2.0% | 0.0% | +9.1% | 0.0% |
LIN leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Total Returns). UFPI leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
JCTC vs LIN vs APD vs UFPI vs ALB: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is JCTC or LIN or APD or UFPI or ALB a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Linde plc (LIN) is the stronger pick with 3.
0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -12. 4% for Jewett-Cameron Trading Company Ltd. (JCTC). UFP Industries, Inc. (UFPI) offers the better valuation at 16. 8x trailing P/E (15. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Linde plc (LIN) a "Buy" — based on 28 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — JCTC or LIN or APD or UFPI or ALB?
On trailing P/E, UFP Industries, Inc.
(UFPI) is the cheapest at 16. 8x versus Linde plc at 33. 8x. On forward P/E, UFP Industries, Inc. is actually cheaper at 15. 9x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Linde plc wins at 1. 09x versus UFP Industries, Inc. 's 3. 49x — a reasonable growth-adjusted valuation.
03Which is the better long-term investment — JCTC or LIN or APD or UFPI or ALB?
Over the past 5 years, Linde plc (LIN) delivered a total return of +73.
9%, compared to -53. 7% for Jewett-Cameron Trading Company Ltd. (JCTC). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: LIN returned +375. 2% versus JCTC's -55. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — JCTC or LIN or APD or UFPI or ALB?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Linde plc (LIN) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
24β versus Albemarle Corporation's 1. 60β — meaning ALB is approximately 565% more volatile than LIN relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, UFP Industries, Inc. (UFPI) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 7% versus 106% for Air Products and Chemicals, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — JCTC or LIN or APD or UFPI or ALB?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Linde plc (LIN) is pulling ahead at 3.
0% versus -12. 4% for Jewett-Cameron Trading Company Ltd. (JCTC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Albemarle Corporation grew EPS 48. 7% year-over-year, compared to -657. 1% for Jewett-Cameron Trading Company Ltd.. Over a 3-year CAGR, LIN leads at 0. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — JCTC or LIN or APD or UFPI or ALB?
Linde plc (LIN) is the more profitable company, earning 20.
3% net margin versus -10. 0% for Jewett-Cameron Trading Company Ltd. — meaning it keeps 20. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: LIN leads at 26. 3% versus -9. 1% for JCTC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — LIN leads at 43. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is JCTC or LIN or APD or UFPI or ALB more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Linde plc (LIN) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 1. 09x versus UFP Industries, Inc. 's 3. 49x. A PEG below 1. 5 suggests fair-to-attractive pricing relative to expected growth. On forward earnings alone, UFP Industries, Inc. (UFPI) trades at 15. 9x forward P/E versus 27. 7x for Linde plc — 11. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for UFPI: 22. 8% to $103. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — JCTC or LIN or APD or UFPI or ALB?
In this comparison, APD (2.
4% yield), UFPI (1. 7% yield), LIN (1. 2% yield), ALB (0. 8% yield) pay a dividend. JCTC does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is JCTC or LIN or APD or UFPI or ALB better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Linde plc (LIN) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
24), 1. 2% yield, +375. 2% 10Y return). Albemarle Corporation (ALB) carries a higher beta of 1. 60 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (LIN: +375. 2%, ALB: +217. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between JCTC and LIN and APD and UFPI and ALB?
Both stocks operate in the Basic Materials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: JCTC is a small-cap quality compounder stock; LIN is a large-cap quality compounder stock; APD is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; UFPI is a small-cap deep-value stock; ALB is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. LIN, APD, UFPI, ALB pay a dividend while JCTC does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.