JELD vs MAS

For growth investors, Masco Corporation (MAS) is the stronger pick with -3.

4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -14. 9% for JELD-WEN Holding, Inc. (JELD). Masco Corporation (MAS) offers the better valuation at 18. 6x trailing P/E (16. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Masco Corporation (MAS) a "Buy" — based on 38 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

Over the past 5 years, Masco Corporation (MAS) delivered a total return of +16.

1%, compared to -94. 5% for JELD-WEN Holding, Inc. (JELD). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: MAS returned +151. 5% versus JELD's -93. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Masco Corporation (MAS) is the lower-risk stock at 1.

28β versus JELD-WEN Holding, Inc. 's 2. 73β — meaning JELD is approximately 114% more volatile than MAS relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, JELD-WEN Holding, Inc. (JELD) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 16% versus 46% for Masco Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Masco Corporation (MAS) is pulling ahead at -3.

4% versus -14. 9% for JELD-WEN Holding, Inc. (JELD). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Masco Corporation grew EPS 2. 7% year-over-year, compared to -226. 6% for JELD-WEN Holding, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, MAS leads at -4. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

Masco Corporation (MAS) is the more profitable company, earning 10.

7% net margin versus -19. 3% for JELD-WEN Holding, Inc. — meaning it keeps 10. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MAS leads at 16. 8% versus -1. 3% for JELD. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — MAS leads at 35. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for JELD: 24.

9% to $2. 11.

In this comparison, MAS (1.

7% yield) pays a dividend. JELD does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

For long-horizon retirement investors, Masco Corporation (MAS) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1.

28), 1. 7% yield, +151. 5% 10Y return). JELD-WEN Holding, Inc. (JELD) carries a higher beta of 2. 73 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (MAS: +151. 5%, JELD: -93. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

Both stocks operate in the Industrials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

MAS pays a dividend while JELD does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.