Compare Stocks

2 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

JEM vs CANG

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
JEM
707 Cayman Holdings Limited Ordinary Shares

Apparel - Retail

Consumer CyclicalNASDAQ • KY
Market Cap$23M
5Y Perf.-98.8%
CANG
Cango Inc.

Auto - Dealerships

Consumer CyclicalNYSE • CN
Market Cap$250M
5Y Perf.-77.8%

JEM vs CANG — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
JEM logoJEM
CANG logoCANG
IndustryApparel - RetailAuto - Dealerships
Market Cap$23M$250M
Revenue (TTM)$88M$3.46B
Net Income (TTM)$7M$-178M
Gross Margin29.1%13.6%
Operating Margin10.7%7.3%
Forward P/E29.0x5.7x
Total Debt$7M$170M
Cash & Equiv.$13M$1.29B

JEM vs CANGLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

JEM
CANG
StockJun 25May 26Return
707 Cayman Holdings… (JEM)1001.2-98.8%
Cango Inc. (CANG)10022.2-77.8%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: JEM vs CANG

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: JEM leads in 6 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and profitability and margin quality. Cango Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for valuation and capital efficiency. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
JEM
707 Cayman Holdings Limited Ordinary Shares
The Income Pick

JEM carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.

  • Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.90, yield 1.2%
  • Rev growth 4.4%, EPS growth 13.3%
  • Lower volatility, beta 0.90, Low D/E 63.9%, current ratio 1.32x
Best for: income & stability and growth exposure
CANG
Cango Inc.
The Long-Run Compounder

CANG is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.

  • -44.9% 10Y total return vs JEM's -86.4%
  • Lower P/E (5.7x vs 29.0x)
Best for: long-term compounding
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthJEM logoJEM4.4% revenue growth vs CANG's -52.7%
ValueCANG logoCANGLower P/E (5.7x vs 29.0x)
Quality / MarginsJEM logoJEM8.5% margin vs CANG's -5.2%
Stability / SafetyJEM logoJEMBeta 0.90 vs CANG's 2.25
DividendsJEM logoJEM1.2% yield; 1-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)JEM logoJEM-72.0% vs CANG's -73.7%
Efficiency (ROA)JEM logoJEM21.3% ROA vs CANG's -2.3%, ROIC 293.4% vs 4.6%

JEM vs CANG — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

JEM707 Cayman Holdings Limited Ordinary Shares

Segment breakdown not available.

CANGCango Inc.
FY 2024
After-market Service Facilitation Service Income
62.9%$41M
Loan Facilitation Income And Other Related Income
24.1%$16M
Automobile trading income
9.6%$6M
Service, Other
3.4%$2M

JEM vs CANG — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLCANGLAGGINGJEM

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

JEM leads this category, winning 4 of 4 comparable metrics.

CANG is the larger business by revenue, generating $3.5B annually — 39.5x JEM's $88M. JEM is the more profitable business, keeping 8.5% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CANG's -5.2%.

MetricJEM logoJEM707 Cayman Holdin…CANG logoCANGCango Inc.
RevenueTrailing 12 months$88M$3.5B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$333M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$178M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$0
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+29.1%+13.6%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+10.7%+7.3%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+8.5%-5.2%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+3.3%-154.0%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+58.3%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+3.6%
JEM leads this category, winning 4 of 4 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

CANG leads this category, winning 3 of 4 comparable metrics.

At 5.7x trailing earnings, CANG trades at a 80% valuation discount to JEM's 29.0x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, CANG's 3.1x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than JEM's 13.6x.

MetricJEM logoJEM707 Cayman Holdin…CANG logoCANGCango Inc.
Market CapShares × price$23M$250M
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$23M$85M
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS29.02x5.66x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple13.63x3.13x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue2.09x2.12x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share20.81x0.42x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF63.42x
CANG leads this category, winning 3 of 4 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

JEM leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.

JEM delivers a 111.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $112 in annual profit, vs $-4 for CANG. CANG carries lower financial leverage with a 0.04x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to JEM's 0.64x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), JEM scores 7/9 vs CANG's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricJEM logoJEM707 Cayman Holdin…CANG logoCANGCango Inc.
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+111.7%-4.1%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+21.3%-2.3%
ROICReturn on invested capital+2.9%+4.6%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+80.8%+4.5%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–974
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.64x0.04x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash-$6M-$1.1B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$13M$1.3B
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$7M$170M
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense20.63x-1.87x
JEM leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

CANG leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in CANG five years ago would be worth $8,579 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2,800 for JEM. Over the past 12 months, JEM leads with a -72.0% total return vs CANG's -73.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CANG at 0.4% vs JEM's -34.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricJEM logoJEM707 Cayman Holdin…CANG logoCANGCango Inc.
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-66.7%-62.0%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months-72.0%-73.7%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-72.0%+1.2%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-72.0%-14.2%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-86.4%-44.9%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-34.6%+0.4%
CANG leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — JEM and CANG each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

JEM is the less volatile stock with a 0.90 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CANG's 2.25 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CANG currently trades 18.6% from its 52-week high vs JEM's 0.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricJEM logoJEM707 Cayman Holdin…CANG logoCANGCango Inc.
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5000.90x2.25x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$158.00$2.88
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$0.17$0.33
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+0.8%+18.6%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10044.758.6
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded12.1M1.3M
Evenly matched — JEM and CANG each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

CANG leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.

JEM is the only dividend payer here at 1.24% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.

MetricJEM logoJEM707 Cayman Holdin…CANG logoCANGCango Inc.
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$3.00
# AnalystsCovering analysts2
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+1.2%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises15
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$0.12
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%+5.3%
CANG leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Key Takeaway

CANG leads in 3 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Total Returns). JEM leads in 2 (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). 1 tied.

Best OverallCango Inc. (CANG)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

JEM vs CANG: Frequently Asked Questions

9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is JEM or CANG a better buy right now?

For growth investors, 707 Cayman Holdings Limited Ordinary Shares (JEM) is the stronger pick with 4.

4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -52. 7% for Cango Inc. (CANG). Cango Inc. (CANG) offers the better valuation at 5. 7x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Cango Inc. (CANG) a "Buy" — based on 2 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — JEM or CANG?

On trailing P/E, Cango Inc.

(CANG) is the cheapest at 5. 7x versus 707 Cayman Holdings Limited Ordinary Shares at 29. 0x.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — JEM or CANG?

Over the past 5 years, Cango Inc.

(CANG) delivered a total return of -14. 2%, compared to -72. 0% for 707 Cayman Holdings Limited Ordinary Shares (JEM). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CANG returned -44. 9% versus JEM's -86. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — JEM or CANG?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), 707 Cayman Holdings Limited Ordinary Shares (JEM) is the lower-risk stock at 0.

90β versus Cango Inc. 's 2. 25β — meaning CANG is approximately 150% more volatile than JEM relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Cango Inc. (CANG) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 4% versus 64% for 707 Cayman Holdings Limited Ordinary Shares — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — JEM or CANG?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), 707 Cayman Holdings Limited Ordinary Shares (JEM) is pulling ahead at 4.

4% versus -52. 7% for Cango Inc. (CANG). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Cango Inc. grew EPS 960. 0% year-over-year, compared to 13. 3% for 707 Cayman Holdings Limited Ordinary Shares. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — JEM or CANG?

Cango Inc.

(CANG) is the more profitable company, earning 37. 3% net margin versus 8. 5% for 707 Cayman Holdings Limited Ordinary Shares — meaning it keeps 37. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CANG leads at 22. 2% versus 10. 7% for JEM. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CANG leads at 55. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Which pays a better dividend — JEM or CANG?

In this comparison, JEM (1.

2% yield) pays a dividend. CANG does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

08

Is JEM or CANG better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, 707 Cayman Holdings Limited Ordinary Shares (JEM) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.

90), 1. 2% yield). Cango Inc. (CANG) carries a higher beta of 2. 25 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (JEM: -86. 4%, CANG: -44. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

09

What are the main differences between JEM and CANG?

Both stocks operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: JEM is a small-cap quality compounder stock; CANG is a small-cap deep-value stock. JEM pays a dividend while CANG does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.

Stocks Like

JEM

Stable Dividend Mega-Cap

  • Sector: Consumer Cyclical
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 5%
  • Dividend Yield > 0.5%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

CANG

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Consumer Cyclical
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 2916%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform JEM and CANG on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(JEM: 4.4% · CANG: 5833.4%)
P/E Ratio<
x
(JEM: 29.0x · CANG: 5.7x)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.