Staffing & Employment Services
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisStock Comparison
JOB vs KELYA vs TBI vs JPM
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Staffing & Employment Services
Staffing & Employment Services
Banks - Diversified
JOB vs KELYA vs TBI vs JPM — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Staffing & Employment Services | Staffing & Employment Services | Staffing & Employment Services | Banks - Diversified |
| Market Cap | $25M | $417M | $212M | $896.00B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $88M | $4.13B | $1.25B | $280.33B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-1M | $-266M | $-53M | $57.05B |
| Gross Margin | 35.5% | 19.5% | 28.4% | 60.0% |
| Operating Margin | -1.7% | -1.9% | -2.6% | 25.9% |
| Forward P/E | — | 13.3x | — | 14.4x |
| Total Debt | $5M | $159M | $171M | $942.38B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $21M | $33M | $25M | $343.34B |
JOB vs KELYA vs TBI vs JPM — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 20 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| GEE Group, Inc. (JOB) | 100 | 41.9 | -58.1% |
| Kelly Services, Inc. (KELYA) | 100 | 76.1 | -23.9% |
| TrueBlue, Inc. (TBI) | 100 | 45.7 | -54.3% |
| JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) | 100 | 341.0 | +241.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: JOB vs KELYA vs TBI vs JPM
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
JOB is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night and defensive.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.64, Low D/E 10.2%, current ratio 4.12x
- Beta 0.64, current ratio 4.12x
- Beta 0.64 vs JPM's 0.94, lower leverage
KELYA is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability is your priority.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.92, yield 2.6%
- Lower P/E (13.3x vs 14.4x)
- 2.6% yield, vs JPM's 1.9%, (2 stocks pay no dividend)
TBI is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 3.1%, EPS growth 61.4%, 3Y rev CAGR -10.5%
JPM carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding.
- 465.8% 10Y total return vs KELYA's -24.0%
- 3.3% NII/revenue growth vs JOB's -17.2%
- 20.4% margin vs KELYA's -6.4%
- +21.8% vs KELYA's +3.0%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 3.3% NII/revenue growth vs JOB's -17.2% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (13.3x vs 14.4x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 20.4% margin vs KELYA's -6.4% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.64 vs JPM's 0.94, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 2.6% yield, vs JPM's 1.9%, (2 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +21.8% vs KELYA's +3.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 1.3% ROA vs KELYA's -11.3%, ROIC 4.5% vs -4.0% |
JOB vs KELYA vs TBI vs JPM — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
JOB vs KELYA vs TBI vs JPM — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
JPM leads in 3 of 6 categories
KELYA leads 1 • JOB leads 0 • TBI leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
JPM leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
JPM is the larger business by revenue, generating $280.3B annually — 3186.3x JOB's $88M. JPM is the more profitable business, keeping 20.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to KELYA's -6.4%. On growth, KELYA holds the edge at -10.7% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $88M | $4.1B | $1.2B | $280.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $258,000 | -$35M | -$10M | $81.4B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$1M | -$266M | -$53M | $57.0B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $726,000 | $66M | -$60M | $100.9B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +35.5% | +19.5% | +28.4% | +60.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -1.7% | -1.9% | -2.6% | +25.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -1.2% | -6.4% | -4.3% | +20.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +0.8% | +1.6% | -4.8% | +36.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -20.5% | -10.7% | -100.0% | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +100.0% | -2.1% | -37.5% | +16.0% |
Valuation Metrics
KELYA leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, JPM's 18.4x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than TBI's 174.4x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $25M | $417M | $212M | $896.0B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $9M | $544M | $358M | $1.50T |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.72x | -1.66x | -4.34x | 16.00x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 13.34x | — | 14.40x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | 0.90x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | 174.38x | 18.36x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.26x | 0.10x | 0.13x | 3.20x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.50x | 0.43x | 0.76x | 2.47x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 47.21x | 3.66x | — | 8.88x |
Profitability & Efficiency
JPM leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
JPM delivers a 15.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $16 in annual profit, vs $-25 for KELYA. JOB carries lower financial leverage with a 0.10x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to JPM's 2.60x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), JOB scores 5/9 vs TBI's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -2.1% | -24.6% | -18.7% | +15.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -1.8% | -11.3% | -8.1% | +1.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -4.2% | -4.0% | -5.2% | +4.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -4.1% | -4.3% | -5.3% | +8.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 5 | 4 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.10x | 0.16x | 0.62x | 2.60x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$16M | $126M | $146M | $599.0B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $21M | $33M | $25M | $343.3B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $5M | $159M | $171M | $942.4B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -4.91x | -8.78x | -46.19x | 0.74x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
JPM leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in JPM five years ago would be worth $21,820 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2,364 for TBI. Over the past 12 months, JPM leads with a +21.8% total return vs KELYA's +3.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors JPM at 33.6% vs TBI's -27.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +14.5% | +41.1% | +58.6% | -0.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +20.3% | +3.0% | +3.3% | +21.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -57.3% | -28.6% | -61.3% | +138.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -62.9% | -46.1% | -76.4% | +118.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -94.5% | -24.0% | -64.4% | +465.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -24.7% | -10.6% | -27.1% | +33.6% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — JOB and JPM each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
JOB is the less volatile stock with a 0.64 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than JPM's 0.94 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. JPM currently trades 95.1% from its 52-week high vs KELYA's 80.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.64x | 0.92x | 0.88x | 0.94x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $0.28 | $14.94 | $7.78 | $337.25 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.17 | $7.98 | $3.18 | $262.71 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +82.1% | +80.6% | +89.7% | +95.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 44.3 | 70.7 | 70.9 | 59.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 249K | 422K | 323K | 7.0M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — KELYA and JPM each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: KELYA as "Buy", TBI as "Buy", JPM as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 24.6% upside for KELYA (target: $15) vs -21.2% for TBI (target: $6). For income investors, KELYA offers the higher dividend yield at 2.60% vs JPM's 1.86%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $15.00 | $5.50 | $339.75 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 5 | 10 | 61 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +2.6% | — | +1.9% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 0 | 0 | 15 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.31 | — | $5.95 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +2.9% | +0.5% | +3.9% |
JPM leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). KELYA leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
JOB vs KELYA vs TBI vs JPM: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is JOB or KELYA or TBI or JPM a better buy right now?
For growth investors, JPMorgan Chase & Co.
(JPM) is the stronger pick with 3. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -17. 2% for GEE Group, Inc. (JOB). JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) offers the better valuation at 16. 0x trailing P/E (14. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Kelly Services, Inc. (KELYA) a "Buy" — based on 5 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — JOB or KELYA or TBI or JPM?
On forward P/E, Kelly Services, Inc.
is actually cheaper at 13. 3x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — JOB or KELYA or TBI or JPM?
Over the past 5 years, JPMorgan Chase & Co.
(JPM) delivered a total return of +118. 2%, compared to -76. 4% for TrueBlue, Inc. (TBI). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: JPM returned +465. 8% versus JOB's -94. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — JOB or KELYA or TBI or JPM?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), GEE Group, Inc.
(JOB) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 64β versus JPMorgan Chase & Co. 's 0. 94β — meaning JPM is approximately 48% more volatile than JOB relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, GEE Group, Inc. (JOB) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 10% versus 3% for JPMorgan Chase & Co. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — JOB or KELYA or TBI or JPM?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), JPMorgan Chase & Co.
(JPM) is pulling ahead at 3. 3% versus -17. 2% for GEE Group, Inc. (JOB). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: TrueBlue, Inc. grew EPS 61. 4% year-over-year, compared to -427. 4% for Kelly Services, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, KELYA leads at -5. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — JOB or KELYA or TBI or JPM?
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
(JPM) is the more profitable company, earning 20. 4% net margin versus -36. 0% for GEE Group, Inc. — meaning it keeps 20. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: JPM leads at 26. 0% versus -2. 9% for JOB. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — JPM leads at 59. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is JOB or KELYA or TBI or JPM more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Kelly Services, Inc.
(KELYA) trades at 13. 3x forward P/E versus 14. 4x for JPMorgan Chase & Co. — 1. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for KELYA: 24. 6% to $15. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — JOB or KELYA or TBI or JPM?
In this comparison, KELYA (2.
6% yield), JPM (1. 9% yield) pay a dividend. JOB, TBI do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is JOB or KELYA or TBI or JPM better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, JPMorgan Chase & Co.
(JPM) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 94), 1. 9% yield, +465. 8% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (JPM: +465. 8%, TBI: -64. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between JOB and KELYA and TBI and JPM?
These companies operate in different sectors (JOB (Industrials) and KELYA (Industrials) and TBI (Industrials) and JPM (Financial Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: JOB is a small-cap quality compounder stock; KELYA is a small-cap quality compounder stock; TBI is a small-cap quality compounder stock; JPM is a large-cap deep-value stock. KELYA, JPM pay a dividend while JOB, TBI do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.