Leisure
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisStock Comparison
JOUT vs YETI vs CLAR vs SWIM vs JPM
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Leisure
Leisure
Construction
Banks - Diversified
JOUT vs YETI vs CLAR vs SWIM vs JPM — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Leisure | Leisure | Leisure | Construction | Banks - Diversified |
| Market Cap | $490M | $3.82B | $119M | $655M | $896.00B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $652M | $1.90B | $252M | $552M | $280.33B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-15M | $159M | $-45M | $9M | $57.05B |
| Gross Margin | 37.5% | 57.0% | 32.6% | 28.5% | 60.0% |
| Operating Margin | 1.0% | 10.8% | -10.6% | 5.5% | 25.9% |
| Forward P/E | 62.4x | 17.5x | — | 29.0x | 14.4x |
| Total Debt | $49M | $228M | $12M | $35M | $942.38B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $176M | $188M | $37M | $71M | $343.34B |
JOUT vs YETI vs CLAR vs SWIM vs JPM — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Apr 21 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Johnson Outdoors In… (JOUT) | 100 | 33.0 | -67.0% |
| YETI Holdings, Inc. (YETI) | 100 | 59.0 | -41.0% |
| Clarus Corporation (CLAR) | 100 | 16.7 | -83.3% |
| Latham Group, Inc. (SWIM) | 100 | 21.5 | -78.5% |
| JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) | 100 | 208.5 | +108.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: JOUT vs YETI vs CLAR vs SWIM vs JPM
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
JOUT ranks third and is worth considering specifically for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.87, yield 2.8%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.87, Low D/E 11.6%, current ratio 3.91x
- Beta 0.87 vs SWIM's 1.95
YETI has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in momentum and efficiency.
- +60.3% vs CLAR's -10.6%
- 12.5% ROA vs CLAR's -16.8%, ROIC 25.7% vs -10.7%
CLAR is the clearest fit if your priority is defensive.
- Beta 1.37, yield 3.2%, current ratio 4.23x
- 3.2% yield, vs JPM's 1.9%, (2 stocks pay no dividend)
SWIM is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 7.4%, EPS growth 161.9%, 3Y rev CAGR -7.8%
- 7.4% revenue growth vs CLAR's -5.2%
JPM is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if long-term compounding and valuation efficiency is your priority.
- 465.8% 10Y total return vs YETI's 196.6%
- PEG 0.81 vs YETI's 6.31
- Lower P/E (14.4x vs 29.0x)
- 20.4% margin vs CLAR's -17.7%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 7.4% revenue growth vs CLAR's -5.2% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (14.4x vs 29.0x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 20.4% margin vs CLAR's -17.7% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.87 vs SWIM's 1.95 | |
| Dividends | 3.2% yield, vs JPM's 1.9%, (2 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +60.3% vs CLAR's -10.6% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 12.5% ROA vs CLAR's -16.8%, ROIC 25.7% vs -10.7% |
JOUT vs YETI vs CLAR vs SWIM vs JPM — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
JOUT vs YETI vs CLAR vs SWIM vs JPM — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
JPM leads in 3 of 6 categories
YETI leads 1 • JOUT leads 0 • CLAR leads 0 • SWIM leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
JPM leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
JPM is the larger business by revenue, generating $280.3B annually — 1110.4x CLAR's $252M. JPM is the more profitable business, keeping 20.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CLAR's -17.7%. On growth, JOUT holds the edge at +15.5% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $652M | $1.9B | $252M | $552M | $280.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $27M | $259M | -$18M | $69M | $81.4B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$15M | $159M | -$45M | $9M | $57.0B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $25M | $264M | -$12M | $18M | $100.9B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +37.5% | +57.0% | +32.6% | +28.5% | +60.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +1.0% | +10.8% | -10.6% | +5.5% | +25.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -2.3% | +8.4% | -17.7% | +1.5% | +20.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +3.8% | +13.9% | -4.9% | +3.3% | +36.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +15.5% | +8.3% | +2.5% | +5.3% | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +3.1% | -35.0% | +35.7% | -40.0% | +16.0% |
Valuation Metrics
JPM leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 16.0x trailing earnings, JPM trades at a 73% valuation discount to SWIM's 60.3x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), JPM offers better value at 0.90x vs YETI's 8.94x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $490M | $3.8B | $119M | $655M | $896.0B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $363M | $3.9B | $95M | $619M | $1.50T |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -13.97x | 24.84x | -2.56x | 60.34x | 16.00x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 62.40x | 17.52x | — | 28.99x | 14.40x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 8.94x | — | — | 0.90x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 81.72x | 14.41x | — | 7.43x | 18.36x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.83x | 2.04x | 0.48x | 1.20x | 3.20x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.15x | 6.33x | 0.61x | 1.65x | 2.47x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 12.19x | 18.01x | — | 25.15x | 8.88x |
Profitability & Efficiency
YETI leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
YETI delivers a 22.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $23 in annual profit, vs $-21 for CLAR. CLAR carries lower financial leverage with a 0.06x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to JPM's 2.60x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), SWIM scores 7/9 vs CLAR's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -3.6% | +22.5% | -21.2% | +2.1% | +15.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -2.5% | +12.5% | -16.8% | +1.0% | +1.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -3.7% | +25.7% | -10.7% | +4.7% | +4.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -3.1% | +22.8% | -11.5% | +4.3% | +8.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 5 | 3 | 7 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.12x | 0.35x | 0.06x | 0.09x | 2.60x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$128M | $40M | -$24M | -$36M | $599.0B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $176M | $188M | $37M | $71M | $343.3B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $49M | $228M | $12M | $35M | $942.4B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 68.93x | 94.46x | — | 1.66x | 0.74x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
JPM leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in JPM five years ago would be worth $21,820 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,445 for CLAR. Over the past 12 months, YETI leads with a +60.3% total return vs CLAR's -10.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors JPM at 33.6% vs CLAR's -25.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +9.6% | +12.4% | -6.3% | -11.5% | -0.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +58.7% | +60.3% | -10.6% | -6.0% | +21.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -15.8% | +39.3% | -59.3% | +60.5% | +138.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -56.4% | -46.6% | -85.5% | -80.3% | +118.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +115.1% | +196.6% | -9.4% | -79.4% | +465.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -5.6% | +11.7% | -25.9% | +17.1% | +33.6% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — JOUT and YETI each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
JOUT is the less volatile stock with a 0.87 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SWIM's 1.95 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. YETI currently trades 97.9% from its 52-week high vs SWIM's 62.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.87x | 1.63x | 1.37x | 1.95x | 0.94x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $53.54 | $51.49 | $4.03 | $8.97 | $337.25 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $28.80 | $29.12 | $2.52 | $4.64 | $262.71 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +87.4% | +97.9% | +76.9% | +62.4% | +95.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 55.0 | 69.2 | 57.6 | 56.9 | 59.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 81K | 1.5M | 202K | 637K | 7.0M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — CLAR and JPM each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: JOUT as "Buy", YETI as "Buy", CLAR as "Hold", SWIM as "Buy", JPM as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 47.3% upside for SWIM (target: $8) vs 0.0% for YETI (target: $50). For income investors, CLAR offers the higher dividend yield at 3.23% vs JPM's 1.86%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Hold | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $50.44 | $3.95 | $8.25 | $339.75 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 3 | 22 | 11 | 8 | 61 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +2.8% | — | +3.2% | — | +1.9% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 15 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.32 | — | $0.10 | — | $5.95 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.0% | +7.8% | +0.0% | 0.0% | +3.9% |
JPM leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). YETI leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 2 tied.
JOUT vs YETI vs CLAR vs SWIM vs JPM: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is JOUT or YETI or CLAR or SWIM or JPM a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Latham Group, Inc.
(SWIM) is the stronger pick with 7. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -5. 2% for Clarus Corporation (CLAR). JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) offers the better valuation at 16. 0x trailing P/E (14. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Johnson Outdoors Inc. (JOUT) a "Buy" — based on 3 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — JOUT or YETI or CLAR or SWIM or JPM?
On trailing P/E, JPMorgan Chase & Co.
(JPM) is the cheapest at 16. 0x versus Latham Group, Inc. at 60. 3x. On forward P/E, JPMorgan Chase & Co. is actually cheaper at 14. 4x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: JPMorgan Chase & Co. wins at 0. 81x versus YETI Holdings, Inc. 's 6. 31x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — JOUT or YETI or CLAR or SWIM or JPM?
Over the past 5 years, JPMorgan Chase & Co.
(JPM) delivered a total return of +118. 2%, compared to -85. 5% for Clarus Corporation (CLAR). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: JPM returned +465. 8% versus SWIM's -79. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — JOUT or YETI or CLAR or SWIM or JPM?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Johnson Outdoors Inc.
(JOUT) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 87β versus Latham Group, Inc. 's 1. 95β — meaning SWIM is approximately 124% more volatile than JOUT relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Clarus Corporation (CLAR) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 6% versus 3% for JPMorgan Chase & Co. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — JOUT or YETI or CLAR or SWIM or JPM?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Latham Group, Inc.
(SWIM) is pulling ahead at 7. 4% versus -5. 2% for Clarus Corporation (CLAR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Latham Group, Inc. grew EPS 161. 9% year-over-year, compared to -28. 8% for Johnson Outdoors Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, YETI leads at 5. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — JOUT or YETI or CLAR or SWIM or JPM?
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
(JPM) is the more profitable company, earning 20. 4% net margin versus -18. 6% for Clarus Corporation — meaning it keeps 20. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: JPM leads at 26. 0% versus -10. 7% for CLAR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — JPM leads at 59. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is JOUT or YETI or CLAR or SWIM or JPM more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 81x versus YETI Holdings, Inc. 's 6. 31x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) trades at 14. 4x forward P/E versus 62. 4x for Johnson Outdoors Inc. — 48. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for SWIM: 47. 3% to $8. 25.
08Which pays a better dividend — JOUT or YETI or CLAR or SWIM or JPM?
In this comparison, CLAR (3.
2% yield), JOUT (2. 8% yield), JPM (1. 9% yield) pay a dividend. YETI, SWIM do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is JOUT or YETI or CLAR or SWIM or JPM better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, JPMorgan Chase & Co.
(JPM) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 94), 1. 9% yield, +465. 8% 10Y return). Latham Group, Inc. (SWIM) carries a higher beta of 1. 95 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (JPM: +465. 8%, SWIM: -79. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between JOUT and YETI and CLAR and SWIM and JPM?
These companies operate in different sectors (JOUT (Consumer Cyclical) and YETI (Consumer Cyclical) and CLAR (Consumer Cyclical) and SWIM (Industrials) and JPM (Financial Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: JOUT is a small-cap quality compounder stock; YETI is a small-cap quality compounder stock; CLAR is a small-cap income-oriented stock; SWIM is a small-cap quality compounder stock; JPM is a large-cap deep-value stock. JOUT, CLAR, JPM pay a dividend while YETI, SWIM do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.