JRSH
Jerash Holdings (US), Inc.
Apparel - Manufacturers
Market Cap$42M
5Y Perf.-31.1%
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Try these comparisons:
Stock Comparison
JRSH vs LAKE
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
LAKE
Lakeland Industries, Inc.
Apparel - Manufacturers
Market Cap$106M
5Y Perf.-25.2%
JRSH vs LAKE — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | JRSH | LAKE |
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Apparel - Manufacturers | Apparel - Manufacturers |
| Market Cap | $42M | $106M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $42.08B | $193M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-477M | $-38M |
| Gross Margin | 15.0% | 34.8% |
| Operating Margin | 0.0% | -7.2% |
| Total Debt | $5M | $32M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $13M | $17M |
JRSH vs LAKE — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
JRSH
LAKE
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jerash Holdings (US… (JRSH) | 100 | 68.9 | -31.1% |
| Lakeland Industries… (LAKE) | 100 | 74.8 | -25.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: JRSH vs LAKE
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: JRSH leads in 4 of 6 categories, making it the strongest pick for profitability and margin quality and capital preservation and lower volatility. Lakeland Industries, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion and operational efficiency and capital deployment. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
JRSH
Jerash Holdings (US), Inc.
The Income Pick
JRSH carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.75, yield 6.0%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.75, Low D/E 8.2%, current ratio 2.75x
- Beta 0.75, yield 6.0%, current ratio 2.75x
Best for: income & stability and sleep-well-at-night
LAKE
Lakeland Industries, Inc.
The Growth Play
LAKE is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 34.1%, EPS growth -437.5%, 3Y rev CAGR 12.2%
- 34.0% 10Y total return vs JRSH's -43.7%
- 34.1% revenue growth vs JRSH's 24.4%
Best for: growth exposure and long-term compounding
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | LAKE | 34.1% revenue growth vs JRSH's 24.4% |
| Quality / Margins | JRSH | -1.1% margin vs LAKE's -19.4% |
| Stability / Safety | JRSH | Beta 0.75 vs LAKE's 1.35, lower leverage |
| Dividends | JRSH | 6.0% yield, vs LAKE's 1.1% |
| Momentum (1Y) | JRSH | +15.3% vs LAKE's -33.3% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | LAKE | -17.0% ROA vs JRSH's -5.7%, ROIC -5.1% vs 2.0% |
JRSH vs LAKE — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
FY 2014
JRSH vs LAKE — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLJRSHLAGGINGLAKE
LAKELakeland Industries, …
1leads
JRSHJerash Holdings (US),…
5leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs LAKEMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
JRSH4/5
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
JRSH2/3
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
JRSH7/9
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
LAKE4/6
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
JRSH2/2
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
JRSH1/1
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
JRSH leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
JRSH is the larger business by revenue, generating $42.1B annually — 217.5x LAKE's $193M. JRSH is the more profitable business, keeping -1.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to LAKE's -19.4%. On growth, JRSH holds the edge at +18.0% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | JRSHJerash Holdings (… | LAKELakeland Industri… |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $42.1B | $193M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $1.8B | -$11M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$477M | -$38M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$3M | -$16M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +15.0% | +34.8% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +0.0% | -7.2% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -1.1% | -19.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -0.0% | -8.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +18.0% | +4.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | -165.0% |
JRSH leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
JRSH leads this category, winning 2 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | JRSHJerash Holdings (… | LAKELakeland Industri… |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $42M | $106M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $34M | $120M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -48.55x | -4.46x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 7.25x | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.29x | 0.64x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.66x | 0.55x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — |
JRSH leads this category, winning 2 of 3 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
JRSH leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
LAKE delivers a -27.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-28 in annual profit, vs $-7 for JRSH. JRSH carries lower financial leverage with a 0.08x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to LAKE's 0.22x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), JRSH scores 5/9 vs LAKE's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | JRSHJerash Holdings (… | LAKELakeland Industri… |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -7.5% | -27.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -5.7% | -17.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +2.0% | -5.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +2.2% | -5.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 3 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.08x | 0.22x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$8M | $14M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $13M | $17M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $5M | $32M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 11.19x | -23.38x |
JRSH leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
LAKE leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in JRSH five years ago would be worth $6,739 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $4,174 for LAKE. Over the past 12 months, JRSH leads with a +15.3% total return vs LAKE's -33.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors LAKE at -1.3% vs JRSH's -5.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | JRSHJerash Holdings (… | LAKELakeland Industri… |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +10.8% | +22.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +15.3% | -33.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -14.7% | -4.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -32.6% | -58.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -43.7% | +34.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -5.2% | -1.3% |
LAKE leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
JRSH leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
JRSH is the less volatile stock with a 0.75 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than LAKE's 1.35 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. JRSH currently trades 92.8% from its 52-week high vs LAKE's 52.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | JRSHJerash Holdings (… | LAKELakeland Industri… |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.75x | 1.35x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $3.60 | $20.50 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $2.85 | $7.15 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +92.8% | +52.9% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 73.4 | 50.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 75K | 100K |
JRSH leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
JRSH leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
For income investors, JRSH offers the higher dividend yield at 5.97% vs LAKE's 1.10%.
| Metric | JRSHJerash Holdings (… | LAKELakeland Industri… |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $14.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 9 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +6.0% | +1.1% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.20 | $0.12 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.4% |
JRSH leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Key Takeaway
JRSH leads in 5 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). LAKE leads in 1 (Total Returns).
Best OverallJerash Holdings (US), Inc. (JRSH)Leads 5 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
JRSH vs LAKE: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is JRSH or LAKE a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Lakeland Industries, Inc.
(LAKE) is the stronger pick with 34. 1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 24. 4% for Jerash Holdings (US), Inc. (JRSH). Analysts rate Lakeland Industries, Inc. (LAKE) a "Buy" — based on 9 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — JRSH or LAKE?
Over the past 5 years, Jerash Holdings (US), Inc.
(JRSH) delivered a total return of -32. 6%, compared to -58. 3% for Lakeland Industries, Inc. (LAKE). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: LAKE returned +34. 0% versus JRSH's -43. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — JRSH or LAKE?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Jerash Holdings (US), Inc.
(JRSH) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 75β versus Lakeland Industries, Inc. 's 1. 35β — meaning LAKE is approximately 80% more volatile than JRSH relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Jerash Holdings (US), Inc. (JRSH) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 8% versus 22% for Lakeland Industries, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — JRSH or LAKE?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Lakeland Industries, Inc.
(LAKE) is pulling ahead at 34. 1% versus 24. 4% for Jerash Holdings (US), Inc. (JRSH). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Jerash Holdings (US), Inc. grew EPS 57. 0% year-over-year, compared to -437. 5% for Lakeland Industries, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, LAKE leads at 12. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — JRSH or LAKE?
Jerash Holdings (US), Inc.
(JRSH) is the more profitable company, earning -0. 6% net margin versus -10. 8% for Lakeland Industries, Inc. — meaning it keeps -0. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: JRSH leads at 1. 0% versus -5. 5% for LAKE. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — LAKE leads at 41. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — JRSH or LAKE?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Jerash Holdings (US), Inc. (JRSH) offers the highest yield at 6. 0%, versus 1. 1% for Lakeland Industries, Inc. (LAKE).
07Is JRSH or LAKE better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Jerash Holdings (US), Inc.
(JRSH) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 75), 6. 0% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (JRSH: -43. 7%, LAKE: +34. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between JRSH and LAKE?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
Revenue Growth>
%
(JRSH: 18.0% · LAKE: 4.0%)You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.