Apparel - Manufacturers
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
JRSH vs LAKE vs KFRC vs RCKY vs HURN
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Apparel - Manufacturers
Staffing & Employment Services
Apparel - Footwear & Accessories
Consulting Services
JRSH vs LAKE vs KFRC vs RCKY vs HURN — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Apparel - Manufacturers | Apparel - Manufacturers | Staffing & Employment Services | Apparel - Footwear & Accessories | Consulting Services |
| Market Cap | $42M | $106M | $790M | $274M | $2.02B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $42.08B | $193M | $1.33B | $482M | $1.74B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-477M | $-38M | $35M | $22M | $104M |
| Gross Margin | 15.0% | 34.8% | 27.2% | 40.9% | 23.3% |
| Operating Margin | 0.0% | -7.2% | 3.8% | 7.7% | 11.3% |
| Forward P/E | — | — | 18.0x | 9.9x | 14.2x |
| Total Debt | $5M | $32M | $70M | $124M | $548M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $13M | $17M | $2M | $3M | $25M |
JRSH vs LAKE vs KFRC vs RCKY vs HURN — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jerash Holdings (US… (JRSH) | 100 | 68.9 | -31.1% |
| Lakeland Industries… (LAKE) | 100 | 70.1 | -29.9% |
| Kforce Inc. (KFRC) | 100 | 143.1 | +43.1% |
| Rocky Brands, Inc. (RCKY) | 100 | 175.0 | +75.0% |
| Huron Consulting Gr… (HURN) | 100 | 269.7 | +169.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: JRSH vs LAKE vs KFRC vs RCKY vs HURN
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
JRSH ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night.
- Rev growth 24.4%, EPS growth 57.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 0.6%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.75, Low D/E 8.2%, current ratio 2.75x
- Beta 0.75, yield 6.0%, current ratio 2.75x
- 6.0% yield, vs KFRC's 3.6%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
LAKE is the clearest fit if your priority is growth.
- 34.1% revenue growth vs KFRC's -5.4%
KFRC has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 8 yrs, beta 0.53, yield 3.6%
- 195.5% 10Y total return vs RCKY's 250.3%
- Beta 0.53 vs RCKY's 1.36
- 9.2% ROA vs JRSH's -5.7%, ROIC 19.1% vs 2.0%
RCKY is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if value and momentum is your priority.
- Lower P/E (9.9x vs 18.0x)
- +91.9% vs LAKE's -33.3%
HURN is the clearest fit if your priority is quality.
- 6.0% margin vs LAKE's -19.4%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 34.1% revenue growth vs KFRC's -5.4% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (9.9x vs 18.0x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 6.0% margin vs LAKE's -19.4% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.53 vs RCKY's 1.36 | |
| Dividends | 6.0% yield, vs KFRC's 3.6%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +91.9% vs LAKE's -33.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 9.2% ROA vs JRSH's -5.7%, ROIC 19.1% vs 2.0% |
JRSH vs LAKE vs KFRC vs RCKY vs HURN — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
JRSH vs LAKE vs KFRC vs RCKY vs HURN — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
HURN leads in 1 of 6 categories
JRSH leads 1 • RCKY leads 1 • LAKE leads 0 • KFRC leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
HURN leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
JRSH is the larger business by revenue, generating $42.1B annually — 217.5x LAKE's $193M. HURN is the more profitable business, keeping 6.0% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to LAKE's -19.4%. On growth, JRSH holds the edge at +18.0% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $42.1B | $193M | $1.3B | $482M | $1.7B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $1.8B | -$11M | $56M | $47M | $231M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$477M | -$38M | $35M | $22M | $104M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$3M | -$16M | $43M | $10M | $124M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +15.0% | +34.8% | +27.2% | +40.9% | +23.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +0.0% | -7.2% | +3.8% | +7.7% | +11.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -1.1% | -19.4% | +2.6% | +4.6% | +6.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -0.0% | -8.2% | +3.3% | +2.0% | +7.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +18.0% | +4.0% | +0.1% | +9.1% | +14.2% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | -165.0% | +2.2% | +34.4% | +0.8% |
Valuation Metrics
JRSH leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 12.3x trailing earnings, RCKY trades at a 44% valuation discount to KFRC's 22.1x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, JRSH's 7.2x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than KFRC's 15.4x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $42M | $106M | $790M | $274M | $2.0B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $34M | $120M | $858M | $395M | $2.5B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -48.55x | -4.46x | 22.05x | 12.26x | 21.37x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | 17.96x | 9.89x | 14.18x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | 14.34x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 7.25x | — | 15.42x | 8.40x | 10.99x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.29x | 0.64x | 0.59x | 0.57x | 1.19x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.66x | 0.55x | 6.17x | 1.08x | 4.25x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | 16.88x | 28.14x | 11.06x |
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — JRSH and KFRC each lead in 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
KFRC delivers a 27.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $27 in annual profit, vs $-7 for JRSH. JRSH carries lower financial leverage with a 0.08x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to HURN's 1.04x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), RCKY scores 7/9 vs LAKE's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -7.5% | -27.9% | +27.2% | +9.2% | +21.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -5.7% | -17.0% | +9.2% | +4.7% | +6.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +2.0% | -5.1% | +19.1% | +7.6% | +15.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +2.2% | -5.9% | +20.1% | +9.9% | +18.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 3 | 4 | 7 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.08x | 0.22x | 0.56x | 0.49x | 1.04x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$8M | $14M | $68M | $121M | $524M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $13M | $17M | $2M | $3M | $25M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $5M | $32M | $70M | $124M | $548M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 11.19x | -23.38x | — | 2.38x | 7.70x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
RCKY leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in HURN five years ago would be worth $22,023 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $4,174 for LAKE. Over the past 12 months, RCKY leads with a +91.9% total return vs LAKE's -33.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors RCKY at 23.6% vs JRSH's -5.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +10.8% | +22.5% | +39.2% | +27.1% | -27.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +15.3% | -33.3% | +18.9% | +91.9% | -17.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -14.7% | -4.0% | -13.8% | +89.0% | +62.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -32.6% | -58.3% | -16.8% | -39.9% | +120.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -43.7% | +34.0% | +195.5% | +250.3% | +116.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -5.2% | -1.3% | -4.8% | +23.6% | +17.6% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — JRSH and KFRC each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
KFRC is the less volatile stock with a 0.53 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than RCKY's 1.36 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. JRSH currently trades 92.8% from its 52-week high vs LAKE's 52.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.75x | 1.35x | 0.53x | 1.36x | 0.82x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $3.60 | $20.50 | $47.48 | $48.70 | $186.78 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $2.85 | $7.15 | $24.49 | $18.86 | $112.45 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +92.8% | +52.9% | +91.0% | +74.5% | +66.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 73.4 | 50.8 | 65.6 | 34.6 | 37.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 75K | 100K | 305K | 63K | 243K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — JRSH and KFRC each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: LAKE as "Buy", KFRC as "Hold", RCKY as "Buy", HURN as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 64.3% upside for KFRC (target: $71) vs 29.2% for LAKE (target: $14). For income investors, JRSH offers the higher dividend yield at 5.97% vs LAKE's 1.10%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Hold | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $14.00 | $71.00 | $52.00 | $200.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 9 | 10 | 4 | 9 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +6.0% | +1.1% | +3.6% | +1.7% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 0 | 8 | 0 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.20 | $0.12 | $1.55 | $0.62 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.4% | +6.4% | +0.1% | +8.2% |
HURN leads in 1 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow). JRSH leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 3 tied.
JRSH vs LAKE vs KFRC vs RCKY vs HURN: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is JRSH or LAKE or KFRC or RCKY or HURN a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Lakeland Industries, Inc.
(LAKE) is the stronger pick with 34. 1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -5. 4% for Kforce Inc. (KFRC). Rocky Brands, Inc. (RCKY) offers the better valuation at 12. 3x trailing P/E (9. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Lakeland Industries, Inc. (LAKE) a "Buy" — based on 9 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — JRSH or LAKE or KFRC or RCKY or HURN?
On trailing P/E, Rocky Brands, Inc.
(RCKY) is the cheapest at 12. 3x versus Kforce Inc. at 22. 1x. On forward P/E, Rocky Brands, Inc. is actually cheaper at 9. 9x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — JRSH or LAKE or KFRC or RCKY or HURN?
Over the past 5 years, Huron Consulting Group Inc.
(HURN) delivered a total return of +120. 2%, compared to -58. 3% for Lakeland Industries, Inc. (LAKE). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: RCKY returned +250. 3% versus JRSH's -43. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — JRSH or LAKE or KFRC or RCKY or HURN?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Kforce Inc.
(KFRC) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 53β versus Rocky Brands, Inc. 's 1. 36β — meaning RCKY is approximately 156% more volatile than KFRC relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Jerash Holdings (US), Inc. (JRSH) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 8% versus 104% for Huron Consulting Group Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — JRSH or LAKE or KFRC or RCKY or HURN?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Lakeland Industries, Inc.
(LAKE) is pulling ahead at 34. 1% versus -5. 4% for Kforce Inc. (KFRC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Rocky Brands, Inc. grew EPS 94. 7% year-over-year, compared to -437. 5% for Lakeland Industries, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, HURN leads at 14. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — JRSH or LAKE or KFRC or RCKY or HURN?
Huron Consulting Group Inc.
(HURN) is the more profitable company, earning 6. 2% net margin versus -10. 8% for Lakeland Industries, Inc. — meaning it keeps 6. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: HURN leads at 11. 7% versus -5. 5% for LAKE. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — LAKE leads at 41. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is JRSH or LAKE or KFRC or RCKY or HURN more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Rocky Brands, Inc.
(RCKY) trades at 9. 9x forward P/E versus 18. 0x for Kforce Inc. — 8. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for KFRC: 64. 3% to $71. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — JRSH or LAKE or KFRC or RCKY or HURN?
In this comparison, JRSH (6.
0% yield), KFRC (3. 6% yield), RCKY (1. 7% yield), LAKE (1. 1% yield) pay a dividend. HURN does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is JRSH or LAKE or KFRC or RCKY or HURN better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Kforce Inc.
(KFRC) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 53), 3. 6% yield, +195. 5% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (KFRC: +195. 5%, LAKE: +34. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between JRSH and LAKE and KFRC and RCKY and HURN?
These companies operate in different sectors (JRSH (Consumer Cyclical) and LAKE (Consumer Cyclical) and KFRC (Industrials) and RCKY (Consumer Cyclical) and HURN (Industrials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: JRSH is a small-cap high-growth stock; LAKE is a small-cap high-growth stock; KFRC is a small-cap income-oriented stock; RCKY is a small-cap deep-value stock; HURN is a small-cap quality compounder stock. JRSH, LAKE, KFRC, RCKY pay a dividend while HURN does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.