Insurance - Specialty
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
JRVR vs SKWD
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Insurance - Property & Casualty
JRVR vs SKWD — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Insurance - Specialty | Insurance - Property & Casualty |
| Market Cap | $198M | $2.03B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $667M | $1.47B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $29M | $174M |
| Gross Margin | 27.4% | 43.7% |
| Operating Margin | 3.6% | 15.3% |
| Forward P/E | 3.9x | 9.4x |
| Total Debt | $330M | $120M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $261M | $169M |
JRVR vs SKWD — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jan 23 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| James River Group H… (JRVR) | 100 | 19.0 | -81.0% |
| Skyward Specialty I… (SKWD) | 100 | 245.9 | +145.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: JRVR vs SKWD
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
JRVR carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.50, yield 0.8%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.50, Low D/E 49.1%, current ratio 0.91x
- Beta 0.50, yield 0.8%, current ratio 0.91x
SKWD is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 23.2%, EPS growth 41.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 30.5%
- 138.3% 10Y total return vs JRVR's -58.2%
- 23.2% revenue growth vs JRVR's -2.8%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 23.2% revenue growth vs JRVR's -2.8% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (3.9x vs 9.4x) | |
| Quality / Margins | Combined ratio 0.8 vs JRVR's 0.9 (lower = better underwriting) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.50 vs SKWD's 0.60 | |
| Dividends | 0.8% yield; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | -9.6% vs SKWD's -22.7% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 3.8% ROA vs JRVR's 0.7%, ROIC 18.5% vs 5.9% |
JRVR vs SKWD — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
JRVR vs SKWD — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SKWD leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SKWD is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.5B annually — 2.2x JRVR's $667M. SKWD is the more profitable business, keeping 11.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to JRVR's 4.3%. On growth, SKWD holds the edge at +26.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $667M | $1.5B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $25M | $225M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $29M | $174M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $29M | $475M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +27.4% | +43.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +3.6% | +15.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +4.3% | +11.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +4.4% | +32.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -12.1% | +26.6% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -2.8% | +194.3% |
Valuation Metrics
JRVR leads this category, winning 5 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 5.4x trailing earnings, JRVR trades at a 51% valuation discount to SKWD's 11.2x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, JRVR's 5.4x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than SKWD's 9.0x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $198M | $2.0B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $267M | $2.0B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 5.44x | 11.18x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 3.91x | 9.37x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.14x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 5.35x | 9.00x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.29x | 1.43x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.38x | 1.89x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 5.03x |
Profitability & Efficiency
SKWD leads this category, winning 9 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
SKWD delivers a 18.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $18 in annual profit, vs $5 for JRVR. SKWD carries lower financial leverage with a 0.12x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to JRVR's 0.49x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), SKWD scores 6/9 vs JRVR's 5/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +4.7% | +18.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +0.7% | +3.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +5.9% | +18.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +4.3% | +9.7% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.49x | 0.12x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $69M | -$49M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $261M | $169M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $330M | $120M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 1.78x | 29.18x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
SKWD leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in SKWD five years ago would be worth $23,827 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,565 for JRVR. Over the past 12 months, JRVR leads with a -9.6% total return vs SKWD's -22.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors SKWD at 27.2% vs JRVR's -39.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -30.0% | -6.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -9.6% | -22.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -78.1% | +106.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -84.3% | +138.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -58.2% | +138.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -39.7% | +27.2% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — JRVR and SKWD each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
JRVR is the less volatile stock with a 0.50 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SKWD's 0.60 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. SKWD currently trades 70.0% from its 52-week high vs JRVR's 59.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.50x | 0.60x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $7.20 | $65.05 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $4.29 | $40.60 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +59.7% | +70.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 15.4 | 41.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 296K | 410K |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates JRVR as "Buy" and SKWD as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 62.8% upside for JRVR (target: $7) vs 55.1% for SKWD (target: $71). JRVR is the only dividend payer here at 0.77% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $7.00 | $70.60 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 13 | 11 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +0.8% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.03 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% |
SKWD leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). JRVR leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
JRVR vs SKWD: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is JRVR or SKWD a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Skyward Specialty Insurance Group, Inc.
(SKWD) is the stronger pick with 23. 2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -2. 8% for James River Group Holdings, Ltd. (JRVR). James River Group Holdings, Ltd. (JRVR) offers the better valuation at 5. 4x trailing P/E (3. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate James River Group Holdings, Ltd. (JRVR) a "Buy" — based on 13 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — JRVR or SKWD?
On trailing P/E, James River Group Holdings, Ltd.
(JRVR) is the cheapest at 5. 4x versus Skyward Specialty Insurance Group, Inc. at 11. 2x. On forward P/E, James River Group Holdings, Ltd. is actually cheaper at 3. 9x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — JRVR or SKWD?
Over the past 5 years, Skyward Specialty Insurance Group, Inc.
(SKWD) delivered a total return of +138. 3%, compared to -84. 3% for James River Group Holdings, Ltd. (JRVR). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: SKWD returned +138. 3% versus JRVR's -58. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — JRVR or SKWD?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), James River Group Holdings, Ltd.
(JRVR) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 50β versus Skyward Specialty Insurance Group, Inc. 's 0. 60β — meaning SKWD is approximately 19% more volatile than JRVR relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Skyward Specialty Insurance Group, Inc. (SKWD) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 12% versus 49% for James River Group Holdings, Ltd. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — JRVR or SKWD?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Skyward Specialty Insurance Group, Inc.
(SKWD) is pulling ahead at 23. 2% versus -2. 8% for James River Group Holdings, Ltd. (JRVR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: James River Group Holdings, Ltd. grew EPS 125. 8% year-over-year, compared to 41. 8% for Skyward Specialty Insurance Group, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, SKWD leads at 30. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — JRVR or SKWD?
Skyward Specialty Insurance Group, Inc.
(SKWD) is the more profitable company, earning 12. 0% net margin versus 6. 9% for James River Group Holdings, Ltd. — meaning it keeps 12. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: SKWD leads at 15. 3% versus 7. 4% for JRVR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — SKWD leads at 44. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is JRVR or SKWD more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, James River Group Holdings, Ltd.
(JRVR) trades at 3. 9x forward P/E versus 9. 4x for Skyward Specialty Insurance Group, Inc. — 5. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for JRVR: 62. 8% to $7. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — JRVR or SKWD?
In this comparison, JRVR (0.
8% yield) pays a dividend. SKWD does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is JRVR or SKWD better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, James River Group Holdings, Ltd.
(JRVR) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 50), 0. 8% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (JRVR: -58. 2%, SKWD: +138. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between JRVR and SKWD?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: JRVR is a small-cap deep-value stock; SKWD is a small-cap high-growth stock. JRVR pays a dividend while SKWD does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.