Integrated Freight & Logistics
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
JYD vs GLTO vs GALT vs IMVT
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
JYD vs GLTO vs GALT vs IMVT — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Integrated Freight & Logistics | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Biotechnology |
| Market Cap | $11M | $40M | $136M | $5.53B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.01B | $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-53M | $-210M | $-37M | $-464M |
| Gross Margin | 1.3% | — | — | — |
| Operating Margin | -6.0% | — | — | — |
| Total Debt | $33M | $1M | $106M | $98K |
| Cash & Equiv. | $39M | $258M | $15M | $714M |
JYD vs GLTO vs GALT vs IMVT — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Apr 23 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jayud Global Logist… (JYD) | 100 | 2.6 | -97.4% |
| Galecto, Inc. (GLTO) | 100 | 56.8 | -43.2% |
| Galectin Therapeuti… (GALT) | 100 | 119.9 | +19.9% |
| Immunovant, Inc. (IMVT) | 100 | 168.6 | +68.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: JYD vs GLTO vs GALT vs IMVT
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
JYD carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth and efficiency.
- 3.4% revenue growth vs GLTO's -8.9%
- -30.6% ROA vs GALT's -290.0%
GLTO is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night.
- EPS growth 78.5%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.03, Low D/E 0.6%, current ratio 12.98x
- Beta 1.03, current ratio 12.98x
- +8.3% vs JYD's -55.5%
GALT is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability is your priority.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.70, yield 0.1%
- Beta 0.70 vs JYD's 1.88
- 0.1% yield; the other 3 pay no meaningful dividend
IMVT is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 173.6% 10Y total return vs GALT's 67.4%
- 3.2% margin vs GALT's -29.7%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 3.4% revenue growth vs GLTO's -8.9% | |
| Quality / Margins | 3.2% margin vs GALT's -29.7% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.70 vs JYD's 1.88 | |
| Dividends | 0.1% yield; the other 3 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +8.3% vs JYD's -55.5% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | -30.6% ROA vs GALT's -290.0% |
JYD vs GLTO vs GALT vs IMVT — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
IMVT leads in 2 of 6 categories
GLTO leads 1 • JYD leads 1 • GALT leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
GLTO leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
JYD and IMVT operate at a comparable scale, with $1.0B and $0 in trailing revenue.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.0B | $0 | $0 | $0 |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$58M | -$37M | -$31M | -$487M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$53M | -$210M | -$37M | -$464M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$52M | -$7M | -$31M | -$423M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +1.3% | — | — | — |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -6.0% | — | — | — |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -5.3% | — | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -5.1% | — | — | — |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +113.3% | — | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -25.0% | +139.6% | +27.8% | +19.7% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — GLTO and IMVT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $11M | $40M | $136M | $5.5B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $10M | -$216M | $227M | $4.8B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -2.18x | -6.28x | -2.78x | -9.97x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.13x | — | — | — |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.81x | 0.24x | — | 5.83x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
IMVT leads this category, winning 4 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
IMVT delivers a -47.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-47 in annual profit, vs $-3 for GLTO. IMVT carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to JYD's 0.35x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), JYD scores 4/9 vs GALT's 1/9, reflecting mixed financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -101.8% | -3.1% | — | -47.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -30.6% | -2.8% | -2.9% | -44.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -33.1% | — | — | — |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -34.5% | -28.5% | — | -66.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.35x | 0.01x | — | 0.00x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$5M | -$256M | $91M | -$714M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $39M | $258M | $15M | $714M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $33M | $1M | $106M | $98,000 |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -27.25x | — | -4.24x | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
IMVT leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in IMVT five years ago would be worth $16,241 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $238 for JYD. Over the past 12 months, GLTO leads with a +825.9% total return vs JYD's -55.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors IMVT at 12.1% vs JYD's -68.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -4.3% | +14.6% | -47.9% | +5.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -55.5% | +825.9% | +34.4% | +96.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -96.8% | -51.0% | +12.2% | +40.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -97.6% | -81.4% | -47.2% | +62.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -97.6% | -93.3% | +67.4% | +173.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -68.2% | -21.2% | +3.9% | +12.1% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — GALT and IMVT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
GALT is the less volatile stock with a 0.70 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than JYD's 1.88 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. IMVT currently trades 90.5% from its 52-week high vs JYD's 18.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.88x | 1.03x | 0.70x | 1.37x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $25.75 | $38.33 | $7.13 | $30.09 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $2.38 | $2.45 | $1.21 | $13.36 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +18.8% | +65.2% | +29.6% | +90.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 63.3 | 45.8 | 41.9 | 60.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 19K | 111K | 347K | 1.4M |
Analyst Outlook
JYD leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: GLTO as "Buy", GALT as "Buy", IMVT as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 421.3% upside for GALT (target: $11) vs 67.2% for IMVT (target: $46).
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $43.67 | $11.00 | $45.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 5 | 11 | 23 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | +0.1% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 3 | — | 0 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | $0.00 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
IMVT leads in 2 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). GLTO leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow). 2 tied.
JYD vs GLTO vs GALT vs IMVT: Key Questions Answered
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is JYD or GLTO or GALT or IMVT a better buy right now?
Analysts rate Galecto, Inc.
(GLTO) a "Buy" — based on 5 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — JYD or GLTO or GALT or IMVT?
Over the past 5 years, Immunovant, Inc.
(IMVT) delivered a total return of +62. 4%, compared to -97. 6% for Jayud Global Logistics Limited (JYD). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: IMVT returned +173. 6% versus JYD's -97. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — JYD or GLTO or GALT or IMVT?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Galectin Therapeutics Inc.
(GALT) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 70β versus Jayud Global Logistics Limited's 1. 88β — meaning JYD is approximately 168% more volatile than GALT relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Immunovant, Inc. (IMVT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 35% for Jayud Global Logistics Limited — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — JYD or GLTO or GALT or IMVT?
On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Galecto, Inc.
grew EPS 78. 5% year-over-year, compared to -553. 9% for Jayud Global Logistics Limited. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — JYD or GLTO or GALT or IMVT?
Galecto, Inc.
(GLTO) is the more profitable company, earning 0. 0% net margin versus -5. 9% for Jayud Global Logistics Limited — meaning it keeps 0. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: GLTO leads at 0. 0% versus -5. 8% for JYD. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — JYD leads at 3. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — JYD or GLTO or GALT or IMVT?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
07Is JYD or GLTO or GALT or IMVT better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Galectin Therapeutics Inc.
(GALT) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 70)). Jayud Global Logistics Limited (JYD) carries a higher beta of 1. 88 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (GALT: +67. 4%, JYD: -97. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between JYD and GLTO and GALT and IMVT?
These companies operate in different sectors (JYD (Industrials) and GLTO (Healthcare) and GALT (Healthcare) and IMVT (Healthcare)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.