Tobacco
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
KAVL vs CNTX
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Biotechnology
KAVL vs CNTX — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Tobacco | Biotechnology |
| Market Cap | $238K | $214M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $332K | $0.00 |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-13M | $-40M |
| Gross Margin | 85.0% | — |
| Operating Margin | -8.2% | — |
| Total Debt | $0.00 | $112K |
| Cash & Equiv. | $534K | $66M |
KAVL vs CNTX — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Oct 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Kaival Brands Innov… (KAVL) | 100 | 0.0 | -100.0% |
| Context Therapeutic… (CNTX) | 100 | 40.5 | -59.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: KAVL vs CNTX
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
KAVL is the clearest fit if your priority is dividends.
- 100.0% yield; the other pay no meaningful dividend
CNTX carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- EPS growth 17.4%
- -54.3% 10Y total return vs KAVL's -100.0%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.46, Low D/E 0.2%, current ratio 8.52x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | -45.5% revenue growth vs KAVL's -99.3% | |
| Quality / Margins | 4.9% margin vs KAVL's -39.7% | |
| Dividends | 100.0% yield; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +201.4% vs KAVL's -90.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | -54.8% ROA vs KAVL's -208.3% |
KAVL vs CNTX — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
KAVL leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
KAVL and CNTX operate at a comparable scale, with $332,024 and $0 in trailing revenue.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $332,024 | $0 |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$2M | -$43M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$13M | -$40M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$3M | -$21M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +85.0% | — |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -8.2% | — |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -39.7% | — |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -7.9% | — |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -54.1% | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +94.7% | -80.0% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — KAVL and CNTX each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $238,223 | $214M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | -$296,183 | $148M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.01x | -6.13x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 5.10x | — |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.94x | 3.67x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
CNTX leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
CNTX delivers a -60.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-60 in annual profit, vs $-2 for KAVL. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CNTX scores 3/9 vs KAVL's 2/9, reflecting mixed financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -2.5% | -60.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -2.1% | -54.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -2.4% | — |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -2.3% | -50.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 2 | 3 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.00x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$534,406 | -$66M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $534,406 | $66M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $0 | $112,064 |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -2550.01x | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
CNTX leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in CNTX five years ago would be worth $4,569 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1 for KAVL. Over the past 12 months, CNTX leads with a +201.4% total return vs KAVL's -90.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CNTX at 56.7% vs KAVL's -88.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -39.3% | +50.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -90.8% | +201.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.9% | +285.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -100.0% | -54.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -100.0% | -54.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -88.7% | +56.7% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — KAVL and CNTX each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
KAVL is the less volatile stock with a -0.17 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CNTX's 0.46 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CNTX currently trades 64.4% from its 52-week high vs KAVL's 1.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | -0.17x | 0.46x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $1.16 | $3.62 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.01 | $0.49 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +1.5% | +64.4% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 53.5 | 48.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 22K | 901K |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
KAVL is the only dividend payer here at 100.00% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $5.25 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 6 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +100.0% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.04 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% |
CNTX leads in 2 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). KAVL leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow). 2 tied.
KAVL vs CNTX: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is KAVL or CNTX a better buy right now?
Analysts rate Context Therapeutics Inc.
(CNTX) a "Buy" — based on 6 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — KAVL or CNTX?
Over the past 5 years, Context Therapeutics Inc.
(CNTX) delivered a total return of -54. 3%, compared to -100. 0% for Kaival Brands Innovations Group, Inc. (KAVL). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CNTX returned -54. 3% versus KAVL's -100. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — KAVL or CNTX?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Kaival Brands Innovations Group, Inc.
(KAVL) is the lower-risk stock at -0. 17β versus Context Therapeutics Inc. 's 0. 46β — meaning CNTX is approximately -379% more volatile than KAVL relative to the S&P 500.
04Which is growing faster — KAVL or CNTX?
On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Context Therapeutics Inc.
grew EPS 17. 4% year-over-year, compared to 6. 8% for Kaival Brands Innovations Group, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — KAVL or CNTX?
Context Therapeutics Inc.
(CNTX) is the more profitable company, earning 0. 0% net margin versus -356. 2% for Kaival Brands Innovations Group, Inc. — meaning it keeps 0. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CNTX leads at 0. 0% versus -365. 3% for KAVL. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — KAVL leads at 1037%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — KAVL or CNTX?
In this comparison, KAVL (100.
0% yield) pays a dividend. CNTX does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
07Is KAVL or CNTX better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Kaival Brands Innovations Group, Inc.
(KAVL) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0. 17), 100. 0% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (KAVL: -100. 0%, CNTX: -54. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between KAVL and CNTX?
These companies operate in different sectors (KAVL (Consumer Defensive) and CNTX (Healthcare)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: KAVL is a small-cap income-oriented stock; CNTX is a small-cap quality compounder stock. KAVL pays a dividend while CNTX does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.