KBH vs PHM

For growth investors, PulteGroup, Inc.

(PHM) is the stronger pick with -3. 5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -10. 0% for KB Home (KBH). KB Home (KBH) offers the better valuation at 8. 1x trailing P/E (15. 2x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate KB Home (KBH) a "Hold" — based on 43 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

On trailing P/E, KB Home (KBH) is the cheapest at 8.

1x versus PulteGroup, Inc. at 10. 8x. On forward P/E, PulteGroup, Inc. is actually cheaper at 12. 0x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: PulteGroup, Inc. wins at 0. 73x versus KB Home's 1. 05x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.

Over the past 5 years, PulteGroup, Inc.

(PHM) delivered a total return of +104. 3%, compared to +9. 6% for KB Home (KBH). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: PHM returned +590. 7% versus KBH's +322. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), KB Home (KBH) is the lower-risk stock at 1.

00β versus PulteGroup, Inc. 's 1. 01β — meaning PHM is approximately 1% more volatile than KBH relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, PulteGroup, Inc. (PHM) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 19% versus 44% for KB Home — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), PulteGroup, Inc.

(PHM) is pulling ahead at -3. 5% versus -10. 0% for KB Home (KBH). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: PulteGroup, Inc. grew EPS -24. 3% year-over-year, compared to -27. 2% for KB Home. Over a 3-year CAGR, PHM leads at 2. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

PulteGroup, Inc.

(PHM) is the more profitable company, earning 12. 8% net margin versus 6. 9% for KB Home — meaning it keeps 12. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: PHM leads at 17. 3% versus 8. 4% for KBH. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — PHM leads at 26. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, PulteGroup, Inc. (PHM) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 73x versus KB Home's 1. 05x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, PulteGroup, Inc. (PHM) trades at 12. 0x forward P/E versus 15. 2x for KB Home — 3. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for KBH: 26. 0% to $62. 57.

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

KB Home (KBH) offers the highest yield at 2. 0%, versus 0. 7% for PulteGroup, Inc. (PHM).

For long-horizon retirement investors, PulteGroup, Inc.

(PHM) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 01), 0. 7% yield, +590. 7% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (PHM: +590. 7%, KBH: +322. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

Both stocks operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.