KBR vs BAH vs SAIC vs LDOS

For growth investors, Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation (BAH) is the stronger pick with 12.

4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -2. 9% for Science Applications International Corporation (SAIC). KBR, Inc. (KBR) offers the better valuation at 10. 3x trailing P/E (8. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate KBR, Inc. (KBR) a "Buy" — based on 31 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

On trailing P/E, KBR, Inc.

(KBR) is the cheapest at 10. 3x versus Science Applications International Corporation at 12. 2x. On forward P/E, KBR, Inc. is actually cheaper at 8. 7x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Leidos Holdings, Inc. wins at 0. 54x versus Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation's 0. 78x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.

Over the past 5 years, Leidos Holdings, Inc.

(LDOS) delivered a total return of +33. 4%, compared to -12. 6% for KBR, Inc. (KBR). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: BAH returned +227. 8% versus SAIC's +104. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Science Applications International Corporation (SAIC) is the lower-risk stock at 0.

26β versus KBR, Inc. 's 0. 83β — meaning KBR is approximately 214% more volatile than SAIC relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Science Applications International Corporation (SAIC) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 14% versus 4% for Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation (BAH) is pulling ahead at 12.

4% versus -2. 9% for Science Applications International Corporation (SAIC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation grew EPS 58. 0% year-over-year, compared to 7. 4% for Science Applications International Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, BAH leads at 12. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

Leidos Holdings, Inc.

(LDOS) is the more profitable company, earning 8. 5% net margin versus 4. 9% for Science Applications International Corporation — meaning it keeps 8. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: LDOS leads at 12. 3% versus 7. 1% for SAIC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — BAH leads at 54. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, Leidos Holdings, Inc. (LDOS) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 54x versus Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation's 0. 78x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, KBR, Inc. (KBR) trades at 8. 7x forward P/E versus 12. 7x for Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation — 4. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for KBR: 55. 6% to $51. 67.

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation (BAH) offers the highest yield at 2. 7%, versus 1. 2% for Leidos Holdings, Inc. (LDOS).

For long-horizon retirement investors, Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation (BAH) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.

35), 2. 7% yield, +227. 8% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (BAH: +227. 8%, KBR: +163. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

These companies operate in different sectors (KBR (Industrials) and BAH (Industrials) and SAIC (Technology) and LDOS (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.