KD vs UIS

For growth investors, Kyndryl Holdings, Inc.

(KD) is the stronger pick with 0. 2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -2. 9% for Unisys Corporation (UIS). Kyndryl Holdings, Inc. (KD) offers the better valuation at 14. 9x trailing P/E (7. 3x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Kyndryl Holdings, Inc. (KD) a "Buy" — based on 7 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

On forward P/E, Unisys Corporation is actually cheaper at 4.

0x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.

Over the past 5 years, Kyndryl Holdings, Inc.

(KD) delivered a total return of -69. 0%, compared to -87. 2% for Unisys Corporation (UIS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: UIS returned -58. 7% versus KD's -69. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Kyndryl Holdings, Inc.

(KD) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 42β versus Unisys Corporation's 2. 34β — meaning UIS is approximately 66% more volatile than KD relative to the S&P 500.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Kyndryl Holdings, Inc.

(KD) is pulling ahead at 0. 2% versus -2. 9% for Unisys Corporation (UIS). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Kyndryl Holdings, Inc. grew EPS -19. 0% year-over-year, compared to -71. 0% for Unisys Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, UIS leads at -0. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

Kyndryl Holdings, Inc.

(KD) is the more profitable company, earning 1. 3% net margin versus -17. 4% for Unisys Corporation — meaning it keeps 1. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: UIS leads at 6. 8% versus 3. 1% for KD. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — UIS leads at 28. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

On forward earnings alone, Unisys Corporation (UIS) trades at 4.

0x forward P/E versus 7. 3x for Kyndryl Holdings, Inc. — 3. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for UIS: 113. 1% to $6. 50.

None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.

All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.

For long-horizon retirement investors, Kyndryl Holdings, Inc.

(KD) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding. Unisys Corporation (UIS) carries a higher beta of 2. 34 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (KD: -69. 0%, UIS: -58. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: KD is a small-cap deep-value stock; UIS is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.