Asset Management
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
KDKRW vs AISP
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Software - Infrastructure
KDKRW vs AISP — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Asset Management | Software - Infrastructure |
| Market Cap | $98M | $87M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $4M | $15M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-586M | $29.32B |
| Gross Margin | -5.5% | 50.2% |
| Operating Margin | -29.7% | -47.1% |
| Forward P/E | — | 3.3x |
| Total Debt | $36M | $864M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $51M | $11.75B |
Quick Verdict: KDKRW vs AISP
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
KDKRW is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and long-term compounding.
- beta 1.74
- 8.2% 10Y total return vs AISP's -74.3%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.74, current ratio 4.73x
AISP carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure.
- Rev growth -33.5%, EPS growth 140.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 1.7%
- -33.5% revenue growth vs KDKRW's -74.6%
- 1.9K% margin vs KDKRW's -154.2%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | -33.5% revenue growth vs KDKRW's -74.6% | |
| Quality / Margins | 1.9K% margin vs KDKRW's -154.2% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.74 vs AISP's 2.58 | |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +8.2% vs AISP's -33.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 150.6% ROA vs KDKRW's -5.5% |
KDKRW vs AISP — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
KDKRW vs AISP — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
AISP leads this category, winning 3 of 4 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
AISP is the larger business by revenue, generating $15M annually — 4.0x KDKRW's $4M. AISP is the more profitable business, keeping 1913.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to KDKRW's -154.2%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $4M | $15M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$109M | -$7M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$586M | $29.3B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$156M | -$1.8B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | -5.5% | +50.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -29.7% | -47.1% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -154.2% | +1913.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -30.7% | -119.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +102.5% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +155.6% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — KDKRW and AISP each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $98M | $87M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $84M | -$10.8B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.25x | 3.32x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 25.90x | 5.65x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | — |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
AISP leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), AISP scores 5/9 vs KDKRW's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | — | — |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -5.5% | +150.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | — | — |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -164.3% | -0.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | — |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$14M | -$10.9B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $51M | $11.8B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $36M | $864M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -133.59x | -0.48x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
KDKRW leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in KDKRW five years ago would be worth $10,816 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2,571 for AISP. Over the past 12 months, KDKRW leads with a +8.2% total return vs AISP's -33.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors KDKRW at 2.7% vs AISP's -37.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +2.6% | -19.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +8.2% | -33.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +8.2% | -75.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +8.2% | -74.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +8.2% | -74.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +2.7% | -37.0% |
Risk & Volatility
KDKRW leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
KDKRW is the less volatile stock with a 1.74 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than AISP's 2.58 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. KDKRW currently trades 58.0% from its 52-week high vs AISP's 35.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.64x | 2.61x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $2.74 | $7.20 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.82 | $2.04 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +58.0% | +35.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 55.8 | 56.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 169K | 437K |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | — |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | — |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% |
AISP leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). KDKRW leads in 2 (Total Returns, Risk & Volatility). 1 tied.
KDKRW vs AISP: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is KDKRW or AISP a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Airship AI Holdings, Inc.
(AISP) is the stronger pick with -33. 5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -74. 6% for Kodiak AI, Inc. Warrants (KDKRW). Airship AI Holdings, Inc. (AISP) offers the better valuation at 3. 3x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — KDKRW or AISP?
Over the past 5 years, Kodiak AI, Inc.
Warrants (KDKRW) delivered a total return of +8. 2%, compared to -74. 3% for Airship AI Holdings, Inc. (AISP). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: KDKRW returned -10. 2% versus AISP's -74. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — KDKRW or AISP?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Kodiak AI, Inc.
Warrants (KDKRW) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 64β versus Airship AI Holdings, Inc. 's 2. 61β — meaning AISP is approximately 59% more volatile than KDKRW relative to the S&P 500.
04Which is growing faster — KDKRW or AISP?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Airship AI Holdings, Inc.
(AISP) is pulling ahead at -33. 5% versus -74. 6% for Kodiak AI, Inc. Warrants (KDKRW). Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — KDKRW or AISP?
Airship AI Holdings, Inc.
(AISP) is the more profitable company, earning 1914% net margin versus -154. 2% for Kodiak AI, Inc. Warrants — meaning it keeps 1914% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: AISP leads at -47. 1% versus -29. 7% for KDKRW. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — AISP leads at 50. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — KDKRW or AISP?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
07Is KDKRW or AISP better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Kodiak AI, Inc.
Warrants (KDKRW) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding. Airship AI Holdings, Inc. (AISP) carries a higher beta of 2. 61 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (KDKRW: -10. 2%, AISP: -74. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between KDKRW and AISP?
These companies operate in different sectors (KDKRW (Financial Services) and AISP (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: KDKRW is a small-cap quality compounder stock; AISP is a small-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.