Oil & Gas Exploration & Production
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisStock Comparison
KGEI vs XOM
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Oil & Gas Integrated
KGEI vs XOM — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Oil & Gas Exploration & Production | Oil & Gas Integrated |
| Market Cap | $190M | $623.01B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $64M | $323.90B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $14M | $28.84B |
| Gross Margin | 58.3% | 21.7% |
| Operating Margin | 45.9% | 10.5% |
| Forward P/E | 7.3x | 13.4x |
| Total Debt | $50M | $43.54B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $3M | $10.68B |
KGEI vs XOM — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Oct 23 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Kolibri Global Ener… (KGEI) | 100 | 125.2 | +25.2% |
| Exxon Mobil Corpora… (XOM) | 100 | 138.9 | +38.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: KGEI vs XOM
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
KGEI is the clearest fit if your priority is value and quality.
- Lower P/E (7.3x vs 13.4x)
- 21.7% margin vs XOM's 8.9%
XOM carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth -4.5%, EPS growth -14.5%, 3Y rev CAGR -6.7%
- 101.3% 10Y total return vs KGEI's 42.2%
- Lower volatility, beta -0.37, Low D/E 16.3%, current ratio 1.15x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | -4.5% revenue growth vs KGEI's -22.4% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (7.3x vs 13.4x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 21.7% margin vs XOM's 8.9% | |
| Stability / Safety | Lower D/E ratio (16.3% vs 24.8%) | |
| Dividends | 2.7% yield; 43-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +37.7% vs KGEI's -23.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 6.4% ROA vs KGEI's 4.9%, ROIC 8.6% vs 7.5% |
KGEI vs XOM — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
KGEI vs XOM — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — KGEI and XOM each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
XOM is the larger business by revenue, generating $323.9B annually — 5099.3x KGEI's $64M. KGEI is the more profitable business, keeping 21.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to XOM's 8.9%. On growth, XOM holds the edge at -1.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $64M | $323.9B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $47M | $59.9B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $14M | $28.8B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$14M | $23.6B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +58.3% | +21.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +45.9% | +10.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +21.7% | +8.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -22.8% | +7.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -6.9% | -1.3% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -31.3% | -11.0% |
Valuation Metrics
KGEI leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 12.5x trailing earnings, KGEI trades at a 43% valuation discount to XOM's 21.9x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, KGEI's 5.8x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than XOM's 10.9x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $190M | $623.0B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $238M | $655.9B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 12.47x | 21.94x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 7.34x | 13.41x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 5.82x | 10.94x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 3.29x | 1.92x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.96x | 2.37x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 26.39x |
Profitability & Efficiency
XOM leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
XOM delivers a 10.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $11 in annual profit, vs $7 for KGEI. XOM carries lower financial leverage with a 0.16x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to KGEI's 0.25x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), KGEI scores 4/9 vs XOM's 3/9, reflecting mixed financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +6.8% | +10.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +4.9% | +6.4% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +7.5% | +8.6% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +9.3% | +8.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 3 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.25x | 0.16x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $48M | $32.9B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $3M | $10.7B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $50M | $43.5B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 6.48x | 69.44x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
XOM leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in XOM five years ago would be worth $26,725 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $14,217 for KGEI. Over the past 12 months, XOM leads with a +37.7% total return vs KGEI's -23.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors XOM at 14.3% vs KGEI's 12.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +36.7% | +21.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -23.8% | +37.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +42.2% | +49.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +42.2% | +167.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +42.2% | +101.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +12.4% | +14.3% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — KGEI and XOM each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
KGEI is the less volatile stock with a -0.38 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than XOM's -0.37 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. XOM currently trades 83.3% from its 52-week high vs KGEI's 64.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | -0.38x | -0.37x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $8.27 | $176.41 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $3.35 | $105.53 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +64.8% | +83.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 47.3 | 42.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 221K | 13.9M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates KGEI as "Buy" and XOM as "Hold". XOM is the only dividend payer here at 2.72% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $170.08 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 1 | 55 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +2.7% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 43 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $4.00 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +1.0% | +3.3% |
XOM leads in 2 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). KGEI leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
KGEI vs XOM: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is KGEI or XOM a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Exxon Mobil Corporation (XOM) is the stronger pick with -4.
5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -22. 4% for Kolibri Global Energy Inc. (KGEI). Kolibri Global Energy Inc. (KGEI) offers the better valuation at 12. 5x trailing P/E (7. 3x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Kolibri Global Energy Inc. (KGEI) a "Buy" — based on 1 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — KGEI or XOM?
On trailing P/E, Kolibri Global Energy Inc.
(KGEI) is the cheapest at 12. 5x versus Exxon Mobil Corporation at 21. 9x. On forward P/E, Kolibri Global Energy Inc. is actually cheaper at 7. 3x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — KGEI or XOM?
Over the past 5 years, Exxon Mobil Corporation (XOM) delivered a total return of +167.
3%, compared to +42. 2% for Kolibri Global Energy Inc. (KGEI). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: XOM returned +101. 3% versus KGEI's +42. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — KGEI or XOM?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Kolibri Global Energy Inc.
(KGEI) is the lower-risk stock at -0. 38β versus Exxon Mobil Corporation's -0. 37β — meaning XOM is approximately -3% more volatile than KGEI relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Exxon Mobil Corporation (XOM) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 16% versus 25% for Kolibri Global Energy Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — KGEI or XOM?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Exxon Mobil Corporation (XOM) is pulling ahead at -4.
5% versus -22. 4% for Kolibri Global Energy Inc. (KGEI). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Exxon Mobil Corporation grew EPS -14. 5% year-over-year, compared to -15. 7% for Kolibri Global Energy Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, KGEI leads at 6. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — KGEI or XOM?
Kolibri Global Energy Inc.
(KGEI) is the more profitable company, earning 27. 2% net margin versus 8. 9% for Exxon Mobil Corporation — meaning it keeps 27. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: KGEI leads at 40. 5% versus 10. 5% for XOM. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — KGEI leads at 53. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is KGEI or XOM more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Kolibri Global Energy Inc.
(KGEI) trades at 7. 3x forward P/E versus 13. 4x for Exxon Mobil Corporation — 6. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis.
08Which pays a better dividend — KGEI or XOM?
In this comparison, XOM (2.
7% yield) pays a dividend. KGEI does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is KGEI or XOM better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Exxon Mobil Corporation (XOM) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0.
37), 2. 7% yield, +101. 3% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (XOM: +101. 3%, KGEI: +42. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between KGEI and XOM?
Both stocks operate in the Energy sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: KGEI is a small-cap deep-value stock; XOM is a large-cap quality compounder stock. XOM pays a dividend while KGEI does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.