Education & Training Services
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisStock Comparison
KIDZ vs ATGE vs KO vs PRDO vs LAUR
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Education & Training Services
Beverages - Non-Alcoholic
Education & Training Services
Education & Training Services
KIDZ vs ATGE vs KO vs PRDO vs LAUR — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Education & Training Services | Education & Training Services | Beverages - Non-Alcoholic | Education & Training Services | Education & Training Services |
| Market Cap | $2M | $3.70B | $342.35B | $2.14B | $4.88B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $3M | $1.89B | $49.28B | $855M | $1.74B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-11M | $253M | $13.70B | $170M | $280M |
| Gross Margin | 57.8% | 58.1% | 61.7% | 71.1% | 26.9% |
| Operating Margin | -136.5% | 19.3% | 29.3% | 24.3% | 24.0% |
| Forward P/E | — | 13.4x | 24.3x | 11.7x | 16.0x |
| Total Debt | $9M | $774M | $45.49B | $105M | $847M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $3M | $200M | $10.27B | $132M | $147M |
KIDZ vs ATGE vs KO vs PRDO vs LAUR — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Apr 25 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Classover Holdings,… (KIDZ) | 100 | 0.4 | -99.6% |
| Adtalem Global Educ… (ATGE) | 100 | 92.3 | -7.7% |
| The Coca-Cola Compa… (KO) | 100 | 109.6 | +9.6% |
| Perdoceo Education … (PRDO) | 100 | 135.7 | +35.7% |
| Laureate Education,… (LAUR) | 100 | 170.2 | +70.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: KIDZ vs ATGE vs KO vs PRDO vs LAUR
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
KIDZ lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
ATGE is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 12.9%, EPS growth 79.1%, 3Y rev CAGR 9.0%
- 5.4% 10Y total return vs PRDO's 499.0%
KO is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if quality and dividends is your priority.
- 27.8% margin vs KIDZ's -356.2%
- 2.6% yield, 56-year raise streak, vs PRDO's 1.6%, (3 stocks pay no dividend)
PRDO carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 3 yrs, beta 0.31, yield 1.6%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.31, Low D/E 10.8%, current ratio 5.06x
- PEG 1.71 vs ATGE's 2.18
- Beta 0.31, yield 1.6%, current ratio 5.06x
LAUR ranks third and is worth considering specifically for momentum.
- +55.8% vs KIDZ's -99.9%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 24.2% revenue growth vs KIDZ's -8.4% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (11.7x vs 16.0x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 27.8% margin vs KIDZ's -356.2% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.31 vs KIDZ's 2.94, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 2.6% yield, 56-year raise streak, vs PRDO's 1.6%, (3 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +55.8% vs KIDZ's -99.9% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 13.2% ROA vs KIDZ's -60.2%, ROIC 15.3% vs -57.7% |
KIDZ vs ATGE vs KO vs PRDO vs LAUR — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
KIDZ vs ATGE vs KO vs PRDO vs LAUR — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
PRDO leads in 4 of 6 categories
KO leads 2 • KIDZ leads 0 • ATGE leads 0 • LAUR leads 0
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
PRDO leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
KO is the larger business by revenue, generating $49.3B annually — 16055.5x KIDZ's $3M. KO is the more profitable business, keeping 27.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to KIDZ's -3.6%. On growth, LAUR holds the edge at +15.4% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $3M | $1.9B | $49.3B | $855M | $1.7B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$3M | $450M | $15.5B | $247M | $535M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$11M | $253M | $13.7B | $170M | $280M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$4M | $368M | $12.6B | $221M | $264M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +57.8% | +58.1% | +61.7% | +71.1% | +26.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -136.5% | +19.3% | +29.3% | +24.3% | +24.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -3.6% | +13.4% | +27.8% | +19.9% | +16.1% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -136.0% | +19.5% | +25.5% | +25.8% | +15.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -36.4% | +12.4% | +12.1% | +4.1% | +15.4% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -5.4% | +6.1% | +18.2% | +30.8% | -15.4% |
Valuation Metrics
PRDO leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 14.1x trailing earnings, PRDO trades at a 46% valuation discount to KO's 26.2x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), PRDO offers better value at 2.06x vs ATGE's 2.85x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $2M | $3.7B | $342.4B | $2.1B | $4.9B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $9M | $4.3B | $377.6B | $2.1B | $5.6B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.17x | 17.57x | 26.16x | 14.08x | 18.07x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 13.44x | 24.33x | 11.67x | 16.03x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 2.85x | 2.34x | 2.06x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 10.85x | 25.49x | 8.88x | 10.29x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.56x | 2.07x | 7.14x | 2.53x | 2.87x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.31x | 2.85x | 10.01x | 2.32x | 4.27x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 12.85x | 64.64x | 9.86x | 18.53x |
Profitability & Efficiency
PRDO leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
KO delivers a 41.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $41 in annual profit, vs $-3 for KIDZ. PRDO carries lower financial leverage with a 0.11x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to KIDZ's 2.50x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ATGE scores 8/9 vs KIDZ's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -2.8% | +18.4% | +41.1% | +17.2% | +25.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -60.2% | +9.7% | +13.1% | +13.2% | +12.9% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -57.7% | +12.8% | +15.8% | +15.3% | +20.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -61.4% | +15.2% | +17.3% | +17.5% | +26.7% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 8 | 7 | 7 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 2.50x | 0.54x | 1.33x | 0.11x | 0.71x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $7M | $574M | $35.2B | -$27M | $701M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $3M | $200M | $10.3B | $132M | $147M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $9M | $774M | $45.5B | $105M | $847M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -2.43x | 8.55x | 10.70x | 35.92x | 34.91x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
PRDO leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in LAUR five years ago would be worth $28,770 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $12 for KIDZ. Over the past 12 months, LAUR leads with a +55.8% total return vs KIDZ's -99.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors PRDO at 41.6% vs KIDZ's -89.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -97.4% | +2.1% | +15.8% | +18.1% | +2.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -99.9% | -12.2% | +13.7% | +7.5% | +55.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.9% | +153.1% | +41.5% | +183.8% | +182.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.9% | +177.8% | +59.8% | +182.2% | +187.7% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.9% | +538.9% | +112.2% | +499.0% | +231.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -89.3% | +36.3% | +12.3% | +41.6% | +41.3% |
Risk & Volatility
KO leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
KO is the less volatile stock with a -0.15 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than KIDZ's 2.94 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. KO currently trades 96.2% from its 52-week high vs KIDZ's 0.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.94x | 0.33x | -0.15x | 0.31x | 0.56x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $2327.70 | $156.26 | $82.66 | $38.50 | $37.91 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.19 | $86.97 | $65.35 | $26.66 | $21.16 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +0.1% | +68.2% | +96.2% | +88.5% | +90.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 24.8 | 57.3 | 51.4 | 52.0 | 57.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.4M | 329K | 12.5M | 544K | 1.2M |
Analyst Outlook
KO leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: ATGE as "Buy", KO as "Buy", PRDO as "Hold", LAUR as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 29.4% upside for ATGE (target: $138) vs 8.5% for KO (target: $86). For income investors, KO offers the higher dividend yield at 2.56% vs PRDO's 1.63%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $138.00 | $86.29 | $44.00 | $39.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 3 | 48 | 9 | 11 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | +2.6% | +1.6% | +0.0% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 0 | 56 | 3 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | $2.04 | $0.56 | $0.00 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +5.8% | +0.2% | +5.7% | +4.4% |
PRDO leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). KO leads in 2 (Risk & Volatility, Analyst Outlook).
KIDZ vs ATGE vs KO vs PRDO vs LAUR: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is KIDZ or ATGE or KO or PRDO or LAUR a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Perdoceo Education Corporation (PRDO) is the stronger pick with 24.
2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -8. 4% for Classover Holdings, Inc. Class B Common Stock (KIDZ). Perdoceo Education Corporation (PRDO) offers the better valuation at 14. 1x trailing P/E (11. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Adtalem Global Education Inc. (ATGE) a "Buy" — based on 3 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — KIDZ or ATGE or KO or PRDO or LAUR?
On trailing P/E, Perdoceo Education Corporation (PRDO) is the cheapest at 14.
1x versus The Coca-Cola Company at 26. 2x. On forward P/E, Perdoceo Education Corporation is actually cheaper at 11. 7x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Perdoceo Education Corporation wins at 1. 71x versus Adtalem Global Education Inc. 's 2. 18x — a reasonable growth-adjusted valuation.
03Which is the better long-term investment — KIDZ or ATGE or KO or PRDO or LAUR?
Over the past 5 years, Laureate Education, Inc.
(LAUR) delivered a total return of +187. 7%, compared to -99. 9% for Classover Holdings, Inc. Class B Common Stock (KIDZ). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ATGE returned +538. 9% versus KIDZ's -99. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — KIDZ or ATGE or KO or PRDO or LAUR?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the lower-risk stock at -0.
15β versus Classover Holdings, Inc. Class B Common Stock's 2. 94β — meaning KIDZ is approximately -2085% more volatile than KO relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Perdoceo Education Corporation (PRDO) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 11% versus 3% for Classover Holdings, Inc. Class B Common Stock — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — KIDZ or ATGE or KO or PRDO or LAUR?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Perdoceo Education Corporation (PRDO) is pulling ahead at 24.
2% versus -8. 4% for Classover Holdings, Inc. Class B Common Stock (KIDZ). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Adtalem Global Education Inc. grew EPS 79. 1% year-over-year, compared to -498. 7% for Classover Holdings, Inc. Class B Common Stock. Over a 3-year CAGR, KIDZ leads at 21. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — KIDZ or ATGE or KO or PRDO or LAUR?
The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the more profitable company, earning 27.
3% net margin versus -209. 3% for Classover Holdings, Inc. Class B Common Stock — meaning it keeps 27. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: KO leads at 28. 7% versus -106. 7% for KIDZ. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — PRDO leads at 71. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is KIDZ or ATGE or KO or PRDO or LAUR more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Perdoceo Education Corporation (PRDO) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 1. 71x versus Adtalem Global Education Inc. 's 2. 18x. Both stocks trade at elevated growth-adjusted valuations, so expected growth needs to materialise. On forward earnings alone, Perdoceo Education Corporation (PRDO) trades at 11. 7x forward P/E versus 24. 3x for The Coca-Cola Company — 12. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for ATGE: 29. 4% to $138. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — KIDZ or ATGE or KO or PRDO or LAUR?
In this comparison, KO (2.
6% yield), PRDO (1. 6% yield) pay a dividend. KIDZ, ATGE, LAUR do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is KIDZ or ATGE or KO or PRDO or LAUR better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0.
15), 2. 6% yield, +112. 2% 10Y return). Classover Holdings, Inc. Class B Common Stock (KIDZ) carries a higher beta of 2. 94 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (KO: +112. 2%, KIDZ: -99. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between KIDZ and ATGE and KO and PRDO and LAUR?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Defensive sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: KIDZ is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ATGE is a small-cap deep-value stock; KO is a large-cap quality compounder stock; PRDO is a small-cap high-growth stock; LAUR is a small-cap quality compounder stock. KO, PRDO pay a dividend while KIDZ, ATGE, LAUR do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.