Education & Training Services
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisStock Comparison
KIDZW vs GOTU vs JPM vs DUOL vs CHGG
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Education & Training Services
Banks - Diversified
Software - Application
Education & Training Services
KIDZW vs GOTU vs JPM vs DUOL vs CHGG — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Education & Training Services | Education & Training Services | Banks - Diversified | Software - Application | Education & Training Services |
| Market Cap | $15K | $540M | $892.31B | $5.92B | $123M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $3M | $6.15B | $280.33B | $1.10B | $319M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-11M | $-323M | $57.05B | $422M | $-86M |
| Gross Margin | 57.8% | 67.4% | 60.0% | 72.7% | 61.9% |
| Operating Margin | -136.5% | -8.2% | 25.9% | 14.2% | -11.1% |
| Forward P/E | — | — | 14.3x | 44.8x | — |
| Total Debt | $9M | $586M | $942.38B | $94M | $84M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $3M | $712M | $343.34B | $1.04B | $31M |
KIDZW vs GOTU vs JPM vs DUOL vs CHGG — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Feb 22 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| KIDZ AI Inc. Warran… (KIDZW) | 100 | 0.3 | -99.7% |
| Gaotu Techedu Inc. (GOTU) | 100 | 85.1 | -14.9% |
| JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) | 100 | 225.2 | +125.2% |
| Duolingo, Inc. (DUOL) | 100 | 147.2 | +47.2% |
| Chegg, Inc. (CHGG) | 100 | 3.5 | -96.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: KIDZW vs GOTU vs JPM vs DUOL vs CHGG
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
KIDZW plays a supporting role in this comparison — it may shine differently against other peers.
GOTU lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
JPM is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and long-term compounding is your priority.
- Dividend streak 15 yrs, beta 0.94, yield 1.9%
- 475.6% 10Y total return vs DUOL's -8.6%
- Better valuation composite
- 1.9% yield; 15-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
DUOL carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night.
- Rev growth 38.7%, EPS growth 355.9%, 3Y rev CAGR 41.1%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.88, Low D/E 7.0%, current ratio 2.61x
- Beta 0.88, current ratio 2.61x
- 38.7% revenue growth vs CHGG's -39.0%
Among these 5 stocks, CHGG doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 38.7% revenue growth vs CHGG's -39.0% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 38.4% margin vs KIDZW's -356.2% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.88 vs CHGG's 2.81, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 1.9% yield; 15-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +20.3% vs KIDZW's -99.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 22.6% ROA vs KIDZW's -60.2%, ROIC 40.8% vs -57.7% |
KIDZW vs GOTU vs JPM vs DUOL vs CHGG — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
KIDZW vs GOTU vs JPM vs DUOL vs CHGG — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
DUOL leads in 2 of 6 categories
JPM leads 2 • KIDZW leads 0 • GOTU leads 0 • CHGG leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
DUOL leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
JPM is the larger business by revenue, generating $280.3B annually — 91325.5x KIDZW's $3M. DUOL is the more profitable business, keeping 38.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to KIDZW's -3.6%. On growth, DUOL holds the edge at +26.5% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $3M | $6.1B | $280.3B | $1.1B | $319M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$3M | -$327M | $81.4B | $167M | $11M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$11M | -$323M | $57.0B | $422M | -$86M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$4M | $247M | $100.9B | $423M | -$25M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +57.8% | +67.4% | +60.0% | +72.7% | +61.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -136.5% | -8.2% | +25.9% | +14.2% | -11.1% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -3.6% | -5.3% | +20.4% | +38.4% | -26.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -136.0% | +4.0% | +36.0% | +38.5% | -8.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -36.4% | +21.4% | — | +26.5% | -47.9% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -5.4% | +36.1% | +16.0% | +29.2% | +101.2% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — KIDZW and JPM each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 14.8x trailing earnings, DUOL trades at a 7% valuation discount to JPM's 15.9x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, CHGG's 11.5x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than DUOL's 33.2x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $14,616 | $540M | $892.3B | $5.9B | $123M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $7M | $522M | $1.49T | $5.0B | $176M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.00x | -11.98x | 15.93x | 14.83x | -1.15x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | 14.34x | 44.83x | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 0.90x | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | 18.32x | 33.19x | 11.50x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.00x | 0.59x | 3.19x | 5.71x | 0.33x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.00x | 2.95x | 2.46x | 4.56x | 0.99x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 14.81x | 8.85x | 16.01x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
DUOL leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
DUOL delivers a 33.6% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $34 in annual profit, vs $-3 for KIDZW. DUOL carries lower financial leverage with a 0.07x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to JPM's 2.60x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CHGG scores 6/9 vs DUOL's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -2.8% | -20.8% | +15.9% | +33.6% | -62.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -60.2% | -5.8% | +1.3% | +22.6% | -26.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -57.7% | -33.8% | +4.5% | +40.8% | -13.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -61.4% | -22.2% | +8.9% | +7.9% | -26.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 5 | 5 | 4 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 2.50x | 0.47x | 2.60x | 0.07x | 0.70x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $7M | -$127M | $599.0B | -$943M | $53M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $3M | $712M | $343.3B | $1.0B | $31M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $9M | $586M | $942.4B | $94M | $84M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -11.06x | — | 0.74x | — | -525.53x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
JPM leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in JPM five years ago would be worth $22,071 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $34 for KIDZW. Over the past 12 months, JPM leads with a +20.3% total return vs KIDZW's -99.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors JPM at 32.7% vs KIDZW's -77.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -14.2% | -38.9% | -0.9% | -28.0% | +12.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -99.4% | -61.7% | +20.3% | -73.2% | -25.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -98.9% | -59.5% | +133.8% | -19.3% | -89.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.7% | -90.5% | +120.7% | -8.6% | -98.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.7% | -85.8% | +475.6% | -8.6% | -77.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -77.5% | -26.0% | +32.7% | -6.9% | -52.4% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — JPM and DUOL each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
DUOL is the less volatile stock with a 0.88 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CHGG's 2.81 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. JPM currently trades 94.7% from its 52-week high vs KIDZW's 0.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.66x | 0.98x | 0.94x | 0.88x | 2.81x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $2.00 | $4.12 | $337.25 | $489.00 | $1.90 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.01 | $1.40 | $266.85 | $87.89 | $0.53 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +0.5% | +36.2% | +94.7% | +26.0% | +57.9% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 32.2 | 35.5 | 65.0 | 64.1 | 45.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 7K | 390K | 7.0M | 1.7M | 2.0M |
Analyst Outlook
JPM leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: GOTU as "Hold", JPM as "Buy", DUOL as "Hold", CHGG as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 2665.5% upside for CHGG (target: $30) vs 6.4% for JPM (target: $340). JPM is the only dividend payer here at 1.86% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Hold | Buy | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $2.94 | $339.75 | $136.17 | $30.42 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 10 | 61 | 22 | 22 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | +1.9% | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 0 | 15 | — | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | $5.95 | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +9.4% | +3.9% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
DUOL leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). JPM leads in 2 (Total Returns, Analyst Outlook). 2 tied.
KIDZW vs GOTU vs JPM vs DUOL vs CHGG: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is KIDZW or GOTU or JPM or DUOL or CHGG a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Duolingo, Inc.
(DUOL) is the stronger pick with 38. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -39. 0% for Chegg, Inc. (CHGG). Duolingo, Inc. (DUOL) offers the better valuation at 14. 8x trailing P/E (44. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) a "Buy" — based on 61 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — KIDZW or GOTU or JPM or DUOL or CHGG?
On trailing P/E, Duolingo, Inc.
(DUOL) is the cheapest at 14. 8x versus JPMorgan Chase & Co. at 15. 9x. On forward P/E, JPMorgan Chase & Co. is actually cheaper at 14. 3x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — KIDZW or GOTU or JPM or DUOL or CHGG?
Over the past 5 years, JPMorgan Chase & Co.
(JPM) delivered a total return of +120. 7%, compared to -99. 7% for KIDZ AI Inc. Warrant 2025 - 04. 03. 30 on KIDZ AI (KIDZW). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: JPM returned +475. 6% versus KIDZW's -99. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — KIDZW or GOTU or JPM or DUOL or CHGG?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Duolingo, Inc.
(DUOL) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 88β versus Chegg, Inc. 's 2. 81β — meaning CHGG is approximately 221% more volatile than DUOL relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Duolingo, Inc. (DUOL) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 7% versus 3% for JPMorgan Chase & Co. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — KIDZW or GOTU or JPM or DUOL or CHGG?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Duolingo, Inc.
(DUOL) is pulling ahead at 38. 7% versus -39. 0% for Chegg, Inc. (CHGG). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Duolingo, Inc. grew EPS 355. 9% year-over-year, compared to -498. 7% for KIDZ AI Inc. Warrant 2025 - 04. 03. 30 on KIDZ AI. Over a 3-year CAGR, DUOL leads at 41. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — KIDZW or GOTU or JPM or DUOL or CHGG?
Duolingo, Inc.
(DUOL) is the more profitable company, earning 39. 9% net margin versus -209. 3% for KIDZ AI Inc. Warrant 2025 - 04. 03. 30 on KIDZ AI — meaning it keeps 39. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: JPM leads at 26. 0% versus -106. 7% for KIDZW. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — DUOL leads at 72. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is KIDZW or GOTU or JPM or DUOL or CHGG more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, JPMorgan Chase & Co.
(JPM) trades at 14. 3x forward P/E versus 44. 8x for Duolingo, Inc. — 30. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for CHGG: 2665. 5% to $30. 42.
08Which pays a better dividend — KIDZW or GOTU or JPM or DUOL or CHGG?
In this comparison, JPM (1.
9% yield) pays a dividend. KIDZW, GOTU, DUOL, CHGG do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is KIDZW or GOTU or JPM or DUOL or CHGG better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, JPMorgan Chase & Co.
(JPM) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 94), 1. 9% yield, +475. 6% 10Y return). KIDZ AI Inc. Warrant 2025 - 04. 03. 30 on KIDZ AI (KIDZW) carries a higher beta of 2. 66 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (JPM: +475. 6%, KIDZW: -99. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between KIDZW and GOTU and JPM and DUOL and CHGG?
These companies operate in different sectors (KIDZW (Consumer Defensive) and GOTU (Consumer Defensive) and JPM (Financial Services) and DUOL (Technology) and CHGG (Consumer Defensive)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: KIDZW is a small-cap quality compounder stock; GOTU is a small-cap high-growth stock; JPM is a large-cap deep-value stock; DUOL is a small-cap high-growth stock; CHGG is a small-cap quality compounder stock. JPM pays a dividend while KIDZW, GOTU, DUOL, CHGG do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.