Asset Management
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
KKR vs APO
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Asset Management - Global
KKR vs APO — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Asset Management | Asset Management - Global |
| Market Cap | $90.94B | $73.98B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $19.26B | $26.11B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $2.37B | $4.23B |
| Gross Margin | 41.8% | 95.6% |
| Operating Margin | 2.4% | 31.8% |
| Forward P/E | 16.7x | 14.7x |
| Total Debt | $54.77B | $10.59B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $6M | $16.17B |
KKR vs APO — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| KKR & Co. Inc. (KKR) | 100 | 367.6 | +267.6% |
| Apollo Global Manag… (APO) | 100 | 273.7 | +173.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: KKR vs APO
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
KKR carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure.
- Rev growth -11.0%, EPS growth -28.7%
- -11.0% NII/revenue growth vs APO's -20.0%
- Better valuation composite
APO is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 1.43, yield 1.4%
- 8.0% 10Y total return vs KKR's 7.2%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.43, Low D/E 34.2%, current ratio 0.80x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | -11.0% NII/revenue growth vs APO's -20.0% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.4% vs APO's 0.6% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.43 vs KKR's 1.70, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 0.8% yield, 6-year raise streak, vs APO's 1.4% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | -1.2% vs KKR's -10.5% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.4% vs APO's 0.6% |
KKR vs APO — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
KKR vs APO — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
APO leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
APO and KKR operate at a comparable scale, with $26.1B and $19.3B in trailing revenue. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 16.9% (APO) to 12.3% (KKR).
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $19.3B | $26.1B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $9.0B | $9.4B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $2.4B | $4.2B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $7.5B | $2.6B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +41.8% | +95.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +2.4% | +31.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +12.3% | +16.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +49.4% | +12.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -1.7% | +115.5% |
Valuation Metrics
APO leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 17.8x trailing earnings, APO trades at a 59% valuation discount to KKR's 43.6x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, APO's 7.3x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than KKR's 20.4x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $90.9B | $74.0B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $145.7B | $68.4B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 43.59x | 17.78x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 16.70x | 14.71x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 1.22x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 20.45x | 7.30x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 4.72x | 2.83x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.19x | 2.54x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 9.55x | 22.74x |
Profitability & Efficiency
APO leads this category, winning 8 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
APO delivers a 10.6% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $11 in annual profit, vs $3 for KKR. APO carries lower financial leverage with a 0.34x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to KKR's 0.67x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), KKR scores 6/9 vs APO's 2/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +3.2% | +10.6% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +0.6% | +0.9% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +0.3% | +16.6% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +0.1% | +8.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 2 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.67x | 0.34x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $54.8B | -$5.6B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $6M | $16.2B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $54.8B | $10.6B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 3.29x | 20.22x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
APO leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in APO five years ago would be worth $24,613 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $18,121 for KKR. Over the past 12 months, APO leads with a -1.2% total return vs KKR's -10.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors APO at 30.9% vs KKR's 26.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -20.7% | -10.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -10.5% | -1.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +102.1% | +124.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +81.2% | +146.1% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +720.7% | +796.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +26.4% | +30.9% |
Risk & Volatility
APO leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
APO is the less volatile stock with a 1.43 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than KKR's 1.70 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. APO currently trades 82.8% from its 52-week high vs KKR's 66.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.70x | 1.43x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $153.87 | $157.28 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $82.67 | $99.56 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +66.3% | +82.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 58.5 | 65.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 6.7M | 5.3M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — KKR and APO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates KKR as "Buy" and APO as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 40.2% upside for KKR (target: $143) vs 20.7% for APO (target: $157). For income investors, APO offers the higher dividend yield at 1.39% vs KKR's 0.79%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $143.00 | $157.25 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 26 | 28 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +0.8% | +1.4% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 6 | 2 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.80 | $1.81 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.1% | +1.2% |
APO leads in 5 of 6 categories — strongest in Income & Cash Flow and Valuation Metrics. 1 category is tied.
KKR vs APO: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is KKR or APO a better buy right now?
For growth investors, KKR & Co.
Inc. (KKR) is the stronger pick with -11. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -20. 0% for Apollo Global Management, Inc. (APO). Apollo Global Management, Inc. (APO) offers the better valuation at 17. 8x trailing P/E (14. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate KKR & Co. Inc. (KKR) a "Buy" — based on 26 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — KKR or APO?
On trailing P/E, Apollo Global Management, Inc.
(APO) is the cheapest at 17. 8x versus KKR & Co. Inc. at 43. 6x. On forward P/E, Apollo Global Management, Inc. is actually cheaper at 14. 7x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — KKR or APO?
Over the past 5 years, Apollo Global Management, Inc.
(APO) delivered a total return of +146. 1%, compared to +81. 2% for KKR & Co. Inc. (KKR). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: APO returned +796. 0% versus KKR's +720. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — KKR or APO?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Apollo Global Management, Inc.
(APO) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 43β versus KKR & Co. Inc. 's 1. 70β — meaning KKR is approximately 19% more volatile than APO relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Apollo Global Management, Inc. (APO) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 34% versus 67% for KKR & Co. Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — KKR or APO?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), KKR & Co.
Inc. (KKR) is pulling ahead at -11. 0% versus -20. 0% for Apollo Global Management, Inc. (APO). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Apollo Global Management, Inc. grew EPS -11. 5% year-over-year, compared to -28. 7% for KKR & Co. Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — KKR or APO?
Apollo Global Management, Inc.
(APO) is the more profitable company, earning 16. 9% net margin versus 12. 3% for KKR & Co. Inc. — meaning it keeps 16. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: APO leads at 31. 8% versus 2. 4% for KKR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — APO leads at 95. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is KKR or APO more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Apollo Global Management, Inc.
(APO) trades at 14. 7x forward P/E versus 16. 7x for KKR & Co. Inc. — 2. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for KKR: 40. 2% to $143. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — KKR or APO?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Apollo Global Management, Inc. (APO) offers the highest yield at 1. 4%, versus 0. 8% for KKR & Co. Inc. (KKR).
09Is KKR or APO better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Apollo Global Management, Inc.
(APO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (1. 4% yield, +796. 0% 10Y return). KKR & Co. Inc. (KKR) carries a higher beta of 1. 70 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (APO: +796. 0%, KKR: +720. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between KKR and APO?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: KKR is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; APO is a mid-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.