Build Your Comparison

Side-by-side financial analysis
KLRS logo
KLRS
REPL logo
REPL
ADMA logo
ADMA
TGTX logo
TGTX
KYMR logo
KYMR
Try popular comparisons:

Stock Comparison

KLRS vs REPL vs ADMA vs TGTX vs KYMR

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
KLRS
Kalaris Therapeutics Inc

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$81M
5Y Perf.-46.1%
REPL
Replimune Group, Inc.

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$733M
5Y Perf.-8.9%
ADMA
ADMA Biologics, Inc.

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$1.90B
5Y Perf.-58.6%
TGTX
TG Therapeutics, Inc.

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$7.58B
5Y Perf.+25.6%
KYMR
Kymera Therapeutics, Inc.

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$7.04B
5Y Perf.+215.0%

KLRS vs REPL vs ADMA vs TGTX vs KYMR — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
KLRS logoKLRS
REPL logoREPL
ADMA logoADMA
TGTX logoTGTX
KYMR logoKYMR
IndustryBiotechnologyBiotechnologyBiotechnologyBiotechnologyBiotechnology
Market Cap$81M$733M$1.90B$7.58B$7.04B
Revenue (TTM)$0.00$510M$700M$51M
Net Income (TTM)$-44M$-315M$165M$462M$-315M
Gross Margin61.3%83.0%33.2%
Operating Margin42.1%21.3%-7.0%
Forward P/E9.9x35.9x
Total Debt$1M$76M$80M$261M$82M
Cash & Equiv.$98M$111M$88M$79M$357M

KLRS vs REPL vs ADMA vs TGTX vs KYMRLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

KLRS
REPL
ADMA
TGTX
KYMR
StockMar 25Jun 26Return
Kalaris Therapeutic… (KLRS)10053.9-46.1%
Replimune Group, In… (REPL)10091.1-8.9%
ADMA Biologics, Inc. (ADMA)10041.4-58.6%
TG Therapeutics, In… (TGTX)100125.6+25.6%
Kymera Therapeutics… (KYMR)100315.0+215.0%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: KLRS vs REPL vs ADMA vs TGTX vs KYMR

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: TGTX leads in 3 of 7 categories (5-stock set), making it the strongest pick for profitability and margin quality and capital preservation and lower volatility. Kalaris Therapeutics Inc is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion. ADMA and KYMR also each lead in at least one category. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
🥇TGTX emerged as the overall leader. Track its performance:
KLRS
Kalaris Therapeutics Inc
The Defensive Pick

KLRS is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if sleep-well-at-night and defensive is your priority.

  • Lower volatility, beta 0.81, Low D/E 1.8%, current ratio 12.23x
  • Beta 0.81, current ratio 12.23x
  • 100.0% revenue growth vs REPL's -39.7%
Best for: sleep-well-at-night and defensive
REPL
Replimune Group, Inc.
The Healthcare Pick

Among these 5 stocks, REPL doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.

Best for: healthcare exposure
ADMA
ADMA Biologics, Inc.
The Value Play

ADMA ranks third and is worth considering specifically for value.

  • Better valuation composite
Best for: value
TGTX
TG Therapeutics, Inc.
The Income Pick

TGTX carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.

  • Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.65
  • Rev growth 87.3%, EPS growth 17.5%, 3Y rev CAGR 5.0%
  • 6.1% 10Y total return vs KYMR's 159.2%
  • 66.0% margin vs KYMR's -6.1%
Best for: income & stability and growth exposure
KYMR
Kymera Therapeutics, Inc.
The Momentum Pick

KYMR is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.

  • +82.3% vs ADMA's -62.0%
Best for: momentum
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthKLRS logoKLRS100.0% revenue growth vs REPL's -39.7%
ValueADMA logoADMABetter valuation composite
Quality / MarginsTGTX logoTGTX66.0% margin vs KYMR's -6.1%
Stability / SafetyTGTX logoTGTXBeta 0.65 vs ADMA's 1.11
DividendsTieNone of these 5 stocks pay a meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)KYMR logoKYMR+82.3% vs ADMA's -62.0%
Efficiency (ROA)TGTX logoTGTX42.8% ROA vs REPL's -72.2%, ROIC 16.4% vs -51.9%

KLRS vs REPL vs ADMA vs TGTX vs KYMR — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

KLRSKalaris Therapeutics Inc

Segment breakdown not available.

REPLReplimune Group, Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

ADMAADMA Biologics, Inc.
FY 2024
ADMA BioManufacturing Segment
97.4%$416M
Plasma Collection Centers Segment
2.6%$11M
TGTXTG Therapeutics, Inc.
FY 2025
Product
98.5%$607M
Royalty
0.9%$6M
Other Revenue
0.6%$4M
License Revenue
0.0%$152,000
KYMRKymera Therapeutics, Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

KLRS vs REPL vs ADMA vs TGTX vs KYMR — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLADMALAGGINGREPL

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

TGTX leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

TGTX and KLRS operate at a comparable scale, with $700M and $0 in trailing revenue. TGTX is the more profitable business, keeping 66.0% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to KYMR's -6.1%. On growth, TGTX holds the edge at +69.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricKLRS logoKLRSKalaris Therapeut…REPL logoREPLReplimune Group, …ADMA logoADMAADMA Biologics, I…TGTX logoTGTXTG Therapeutics, …KYMR logoKYMRKymera Therapeuti…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$0$510M$700M$51M
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax-$46M-$323M$221M$150M-$352M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$44M-$315M$165M$462M-$315M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$49M-$283M$108M-$14M-$244M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+61.3%+83.0%+33.2%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+42.1%+21.3%-7.0%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+32.4%+66.0%-6.1%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+21.2%-2.0%-4.7%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-0.3%+69.6%+55.5%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+81.7%+2.5%+72.7%+2.9%+13.4%
TGTX leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

ADMA leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.

At 13.7x trailing earnings, ADMA trades at a 23% valuation discount to TGTX's 17.9x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, ADMA's 9.5x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than TGTX's 62.8x.

MetricKLRS logoKLRSKalaris Therapeut…REPL logoREPLReplimune Group, …ADMA logoADMAADMA Biologics, I…TGTX logoTGTXTG Therapeutics, …KYMR logoKYMRKymera Therapeuti…
Market CapShares × price$81M$733M$1.9B$7.6B$7.0B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash-$16M$698M$1.9B$7.8B$6.8B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-1.52x-2.89x13.68x17.88x-23.36x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.9.92x35.88x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple9.50x62.82x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue3.73x12.30x179.54x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share0.84x1.72x4.21x12.33x4.61x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF68.40x
ADMA leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

ADMA leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.

TGTX delivers a 87.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $87 in annual profit, vs $-103 for REPL. KLRS carries lower financial leverage with a 0.02x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to TGTX's 0.40x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ADMA scores 5/9 vs REPL's 2/9, reflecting solid financial health.

MetricKLRS logoKLRSKalaris Therapeut…REPL logoREPLReplimune Group, …ADMA logoADMAADMA Biologics, I…TGTX logoTGTXTG Therapeutics, …KYMR logoKYMRKymera Therapeuti…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity-72.8%-102.7%+39.0%+87.4%-25.0%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-43.5%-72.2%+27.4%+42.8%-22.3%
ROICReturn on invested capital-51.9%+36.0%+16.4%-24.9%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-41.0%-55.9%+38.8%+17.7%-27.2%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–932544
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.02x0.18x0.17x0.40x0.05x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash-$97M-$35M-$8M$182M-$275M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$98M$111M$88M$79M$357M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$1M$76M$80M$261M$82M
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense-31.98x-48.62x50.85x5.67x-2119.53x
ADMA leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

KYMR leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in ADMA five years ago would be worth $44,620 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2,561 for REPL. Over the past 12 months, KYMR leads with a +82.3% total return vs ADMA's -62.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors KYMR at 50.8% vs REPL's -27.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricKLRS logoKLRSKalaris Therapeut…REPL logoREPLReplimune Group, …ADMA logoADMAADMA Biologics, I…TGTX logoTGTXTG Therapeutics, …KYMR logoKYMRKymera Therapeuti…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-47.8%-0.2%-54.1%+69.1%+18.5%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+56.9%-10.2%-62.0%+32.5%+82.3%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-52.5%-62.1%+112.1%+89.0%+242.9%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-52.5%-74.4%+346.2%+29.3%+70.4%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-52.5%-41.4%+15.3%+605.4%+159.2%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-22.0%-27.7%+28.5%+23.6%+50.8%
KYMR leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

TGTX leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

TGTX is the less volatile stock with a 0.65 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than ADMA's 1.11 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. TGTX currently trades 98.2% from its 52-week high vs KLRS's 36.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricKLRS logoKLRSKalaris Therapeut…REPL logoREPLReplimune Group, …ADMA logoADMAADMA Biologics, I…TGTX logoTGTXTG Therapeutics, …KYMR logoKYMRKymera Therapeuti…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5000.81x0.84x1.11x0.65x0.91x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$11.88$13.24$22.20$50.41$103.00
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$2.14$1.50$7.21$25.28$36.65
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+36.4%+67.1%+37.0%+98.2%+83.7%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10039.763.444.976.156.8
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded86K8.9M5.0M2.0M492K
TGTX leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

ADMA leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.

Analyst consensus: REPL as "Buy", ADMA as "Buy", TGTX as "Buy", KYMR as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 331.2% upside for KLRS (target: $19) vs 10.1% for TGTX (target: $55).

MetricKLRS logoKLRSKalaris Therapeut…REPL logoREPLReplimune Group, …ADMA logoADMAADMA Biologics, I…TGTX logoTGTXTG Therapeutics, …KYMR logoKYMRKymera Therapeuti…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuyBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$18.67$14.00$21.00$54.50$112.60
# AnalystsCovering analysts15101326
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises010
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%0.0%+1.7%+1.2%0.0%
ADMA leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Key Takeaway

ADMA leads in 3 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). TGTX leads in 2 (Income & Cash Flow, Risk & Volatility).

Best OverallADMA Biologics, Inc. (ADMA)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

KLRS vs REPL vs ADMA vs TGTX vs KYMR: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is KLRS or REPL or ADMA or TGTX or KYMR a better buy right now?

For growth investors, TG Therapeutics, Inc.

(TGTX) is the stronger pick with 87. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -16. 7% for Kymera Therapeutics, Inc. (KYMR). ADMA Biologics, Inc. (ADMA) offers the better valuation at 13. 7x trailing P/E (9. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Replimune Group, Inc. (REPL) a "Buy" — based on 15 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — KLRS or REPL or ADMA or TGTX or KYMR?

On trailing P/E, ADMA Biologics, Inc.

(ADMA) is the cheapest at 13. 7x versus TG Therapeutics, Inc. at 17. 9x. On forward P/E, ADMA Biologics, Inc. is actually cheaper at 9. 9x.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — KLRS or REPL or ADMA or TGTX or KYMR?

Over the past 5 years, ADMA Biologics, Inc.

(ADMA) delivered a total return of +346. 2%, compared to -74. 4% for Replimune Group, Inc. (REPL). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: TGTX returned +605. 4% versus KLRS's -52. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — KLRS or REPL or ADMA or TGTX or KYMR?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), TG Therapeutics, Inc.

(TGTX) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 65β versus ADMA Biologics, Inc. 's 1. 11β — meaning ADMA is approximately 71% more volatile than TGTX relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Kalaris Therapeutics Inc (KLRS) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 2% versus 40% for TG Therapeutics, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — KLRS or REPL or ADMA or TGTX or KYMR?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), TG Therapeutics, Inc.

(TGTX) is pulling ahead at 87. 3% versus -16. 7% for Kymera Therapeutics, Inc. (KYMR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: TG Therapeutics, Inc. grew EPS 1747% year-over-year, compared to -25. 9% for ADMA Biologics, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, TGTX leads at 504. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — KLRS or REPL or ADMA or TGTX or KYMR?

TG Therapeutics, Inc.

(TGTX) is the more profitable company, earning 72. 6% net margin versus -794. 4% for Kymera Therapeutics, Inc. — meaning it keeps 72. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ADMA leads at 37. 5% versus -891. 3% for KYMR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — KYMR leads at 100. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is KLRS or REPL or ADMA or TGTX or KYMR more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, ADMA Biologics, Inc.

(ADMA) trades at 9. 9x forward P/E versus 35. 9x for TG Therapeutics, Inc. — 26. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for KLRS: 331. 2% to $18. 67.

08

Which pays a better dividend — KLRS or REPL or ADMA or TGTX or KYMR?

None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.

All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.

09

Is KLRS or REPL or ADMA or TGTX or KYMR better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, TG Therapeutics, Inc.

(TGTX) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 65), +605. 4% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (TGTX: +605. 4%, ADMA: +15. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between KLRS and REPL and ADMA and TGTX and KYMR?

Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: KLRS is a small-cap quality compounder stock; REPL is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ADMA is a small-cap high-growth stock; TGTX is a small-cap high-growth stock; KYMR is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.