Biotechnology
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisStock Comparison
KLRS vs REPL vs ADMA vs TGTX vs KYMR vs JPM
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
Banks - Diversified
KLRS vs REPL vs ADMA vs TGTX vs KYMR vs JPM — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Banks - Diversified |
| Market Cap | $81M | $733M | $1.90B | $7.58B | $7.04B | $896.00B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $0.00 | — | $510M | $700M | $51M | $280.33B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-44M | $-315M | $165M | $462M | $-315M | $57.05B |
| Gross Margin | — | — | 61.3% | 83.0% | 33.2% | 60.0% |
| Operating Margin | — | — | 42.1% | 21.3% | -7.0% | 25.9% |
| Forward P/E | — | — | 9.9x | 35.9x | — | 14.4x |
| Total Debt | $1M | $76M | $80M | $261M | $82M | $942.38B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $98M | $111M | $88M | $79M | $357M | $343.34B |
KLRS vs REPL vs ADMA vs TGTX vs KYMR vs JPM — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Mar 25 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Kalaris Therapeutic… (KLRS) | 100 | 53.9 | -46.1% |
| Replimune Group, In… (REPL) | 100 | 91.1 | -8.9% |
| ADMA Biologics, Inc. (ADMA) | 100 | 41.4 | -58.6% |
| TG Therapeutics, In… (TGTX) | 100 | 125.6 | +25.6% |
| Kymera Therapeutics… (KYMR) | 100 | 315.0 | +215.0% |
| JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) | 100 | 130.7 | +30.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: KLRS vs REPL vs ADMA vs TGTX vs KYMR vs JPM
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
KLRS is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if sleep-well-at-night and defensive is your priority.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.81, Low D/E 1.8%, current ratio 12.23x
- Beta 0.81, current ratio 12.23x
- 100.0% revenue growth vs REPL's -39.7%
REPL doesn't hold a clear category lead here; it's more of a secondary option in this specific comparison.
ADMA ranks third and is worth considering specifically for value.
- Better valuation composite
TGTX carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure.
- Rev growth 87.3%, EPS growth 17.5%, 3Y rev CAGR 5.0%
- 66.0% margin vs KYMR's -6.1%
- Beta 0.65 vs ADMA's 1.11
- 42.8% ROA vs REPL's -72.2%, ROIC 16.4% vs -51.9%
KYMR is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +82.3% vs ADMA's -62.0%
JPM is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 15 yrs, beta 0.94, yield 1.9%
- 465.8% 10Y total return vs TGTX's 6.1%
- 1.9% yield; 15-year raise streak; the other 5 pay no meaningful dividend
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 100.0% revenue growth vs REPL's -39.7% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 66.0% margin vs KYMR's -6.1% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.65 vs ADMA's 1.11 | |
| Dividends | 1.9% yield; 15-year raise streak; the other 5 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +82.3% vs ADMA's -62.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 42.8% ROA vs REPL's -72.2%, ROIC 16.4% vs -51.9% |
KLRS vs REPL vs ADMA vs TGTX vs KYMR vs JPM — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
KLRS vs REPL vs ADMA vs TGTX vs KYMR vs JPM — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 6 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
TGTX leads in 2 of 6 categories
ADMA leads 1 • KYMR leads 1 • JPM leads 1 • KLRS leads 0 • REPL leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
TGTX leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
JPM and KLRS operate at a comparable scale, with $280.3B and $0 in trailing revenue. TGTX is the more profitable business, keeping 66.0% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to KYMR's -6.1%. On growth, TGTX holds the edge at +69.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $0 | — | $510M | $700M | $51M | $280.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$46M | -$323M | $221M | $150M | -$352M | $81.4B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$44M | -$315M | $165M | $462M | -$315M | $57.0B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$49M | -$283M | $108M | -$14M | -$244M | $100.9B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | — | — | +61.3% | +83.0% | +33.2% | +60.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | — | — | +42.1% | +21.3% | -7.0% | +25.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | — | — | +32.4% | +66.0% | -6.1% | +20.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | — | — | +21.2% | -2.0% | -4.7% | +36.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | -0.3% | +69.6% | +55.5% | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +81.7% | +2.5% | +72.7% | +2.9% | +13.4% | +16.0% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — ADMA and JPM each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 13.7x trailing earnings, ADMA trades at a 23% valuation discount to TGTX's 17.9x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, ADMA's 9.5x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than TGTX's 62.8x.
| Metric | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $81M | $733M | $1.9B | $7.6B | $7.0B | $896.0B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | -$16M | $698M | $1.9B | $7.8B | $6.8B | $1.50T |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -1.52x | -2.89x | 13.68x | 17.88x | -23.36x | 16.00x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | 9.92x | 35.88x | — | 14.40x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | — | 0.90x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | 9.50x | 62.82x | — | 18.36x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | — | 3.73x | 12.30x | 179.54x | 3.20x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.84x | 1.72x | 4.21x | 12.33x | 4.61x | 2.47x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | 68.40x | — | — | 8.88x |
Profitability & Efficiency
ADMA leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
TGTX delivers a 87.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $87 in annual profit, vs $-103 for REPL. KLRS carries lower financial leverage with a 0.02x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to JPM's 2.60x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ADMA scores 5/9 vs REPL's 2/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -72.8% | -102.7% | +39.0% | +87.4% | -25.0% | +15.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -43.5% | -72.2% | +27.4% | +42.8% | -22.3% | +1.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | — | -51.9% | +36.0% | +16.4% | -24.9% | +4.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -41.0% | -55.9% | +38.8% | +17.7% | -27.2% | +8.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 2 | 5 | 4 | 4 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.02x | 0.18x | 0.17x | 0.40x | 0.05x | 2.60x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$97M | -$35M | -$8M | $182M | -$275M | $599.0B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $98M | $111M | $88M | $79M | $357M | $343.3B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1M | $76M | $80M | $261M | $82M | $942.4B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -31.98x | -48.62x | 50.85x | 5.67x | -2119.53x | 0.74x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
KYMR leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in ADMA five years ago would be worth $44,620 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2,561 for REPL. Over the past 12 months, KYMR leads with a +82.3% total return vs ADMA's -62.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors KYMR at 50.8% vs REPL's -27.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -47.8% | -0.2% | -54.1% | +69.1% | +18.5% | -0.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +56.9% | -10.2% | -62.0% | +32.5% | +82.3% | +21.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -52.5% | -62.1% | +112.1% | +89.0% | +242.9% | +138.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -52.5% | -74.4% | +346.2% | +29.3% | +70.4% | +118.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -52.5% | -41.4% | +15.3% | +605.4% | +159.2% | +465.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -22.0% | -27.7% | +28.5% | +23.6% | +50.8% | +33.6% |
Risk & Volatility
TGTX leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
TGTX is the less volatile stock with a 0.65 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than ADMA's 1.11 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. TGTX currently trades 98.2% from its 52-week high vs KLRS's 36.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.81x | 0.84x | 1.11x | 0.65x | 0.91x | 0.94x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $11.88 | $13.24 | $22.20 | $50.41 | $103.00 | $337.25 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $2.14 | $1.50 | $7.21 | $25.28 | $36.65 | $262.71 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +36.4% | +67.1% | +37.0% | +98.2% | +83.7% | +95.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 39.7 | 63.4 | 44.9 | 76.1 | 56.8 | 59.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 86K | 8.9M | 5.0M | 2.0M | 492K | 7.0M |
Analyst Outlook
JPM leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: REPL as "Buy", ADMA as "Buy", TGTX as "Buy", KYMR as "Buy", JPM as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 331.2% upside for KLRS (target: $19) vs 5.9% for JPM (target: $340). JPM is the only dividend payer here at 1.86% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $18.67 | $14.00 | $21.00 | $54.50 | $112.60 | $339.75 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 15 | 10 | 13 | 26 | 61 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — | — | +1.9% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 0 | 1 | 0 | — | 15 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — | — | $5.95 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | +1.7% | +1.2% | 0.0% | +3.9% |
TGTX leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Risk & Volatility). ADMA leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 1 tied.
KLRS vs REPL vs ADMA vs TGTX vs KYMR vs JPM: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is KLRS or REPL or ADMA or TGTX or KYMR or JPM a better buy right now?
For growth investors, TG Therapeutics, Inc.
(TGTX) is the stronger pick with 87. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -16. 7% for Kymera Therapeutics, Inc. (KYMR). ADMA Biologics, Inc. (ADMA) offers the better valuation at 13. 7x trailing P/E (9. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Replimune Group, Inc. (REPL) a "Buy" — based on 15 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — KLRS or REPL or ADMA or TGTX or KYMR or JPM?
On trailing P/E, ADMA Biologics, Inc.
(ADMA) is the cheapest at 13. 7x versus TG Therapeutics, Inc. at 17. 9x. On forward P/E, ADMA Biologics, Inc. is actually cheaper at 9. 9x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — KLRS or REPL or ADMA or TGTX or KYMR or JPM?
Over the past 5 years, ADMA Biologics, Inc.
(ADMA) delivered a total return of +346. 2%, compared to -74. 4% for Replimune Group, Inc. (REPL). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: TGTX returned +605. 4% versus KLRS's -52. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — KLRS or REPL or ADMA or TGTX or KYMR or JPM?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), TG Therapeutics, Inc.
(TGTX) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 65β versus ADMA Biologics, Inc. 's 1. 11β — meaning ADMA is approximately 71% more volatile than TGTX relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Kalaris Therapeutics Inc (KLRS) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 2% versus 3% for JPMorgan Chase & Co. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — KLRS or REPL or ADMA or TGTX or KYMR or JPM?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), TG Therapeutics, Inc.
(TGTX) is pulling ahead at 87. 3% versus -16. 7% for Kymera Therapeutics, Inc. (KYMR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: TG Therapeutics, Inc. grew EPS 1747% year-over-year, compared to -25. 9% for ADMA Biologics, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, TGTX leads at 504. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — KLRS or REPL or ADMA or TGTX or KYMR or JPM?
TG Therapeutics, Inc.
(TGTX) is the more profitable company, earning 72. 6% net margin versus -794. 4% for Kymera Therapeutics, Inc. — meaning it keeps 72. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ADMA leads at 37. 5% versus -891. 3% for KYMR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — KYMR leads at 100. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is KLRS or REPL or ADMA or TGTX or KYMR or JPM more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, ADMA Biologics, Inc.
(ADMA) trades at 9. 9x forward P/E versus 35. 9x for TG Therapeutics, Inc. — 26. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for KLRS: 331. 2% to $18. 67.
08Which pays a better dividend — KLRS or REPL or ADMA or TGTX or KYMR or JPM?
In this comparison, JPM (1.
9% yield) pays a dividend. KLRS, REPL, ADMA, TGTX, KYMR do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is KLRS or REPL or ADMA or TGTX or KYMR or JPM better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, JPMorgan Chase & Co.
(JPM) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 94), 1. 9% yield, +465. 8% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (JPM: +465. 8%, ADMA: +15. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between KLRS and REPL and ADMA and TGTX and KYMR and JPM?
These companies operate in different sectors (KLRS (Healthcare) and REPL (Healthcare) and ADMA (Healthcare) and TGTX (Healthcare) and KYMR (Healthcare) and JPM (Financial Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: KLRS is a small-cap quality compounder stock; REPL is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ADMA is a small-cap high-growth stock; TGTX is a small-cap high-growth stock; KYMR is a small-cap quality compounder stock; JPM is a large-cap deep-value stock. JPM pays a dividend while KLRS, REPL, ADMA, TGTX, KYMR do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.