Biotechnology
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisStock Comparison
KLTO vs LLY
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Drug Manufacturers - General
KLTO vs LLY — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Drug Manufacturers - General |
| Market Cap | $7M | $1.07T |
| Revenue (TTM) | $0.00 | $72.25B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-11M | $25.27B |
| Gross Margin | — | 83.5% |
| Operating Margin | — | 45.9% |
| Forward P/E | — | 30.9x |
| Total Debt | $272K | $42.50B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $64K | $7.16B |
KLTO vs LLY — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Aug 24 | Mar 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Klotho Neuroscience… (KLTO) | 100 | 40.9 | -59.1% |
| Eli Lilly and Compa… (LLY) | 100 | 109.6 | +9.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: KLTO vs LLY
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
In this particular matchup, KLTO is outpaced on most metrics by others in the set.
LLY carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 11 yrs, beta 0.53, yield 0.5%
- Rev growth 44.7%, EPS growth 96.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 31.7%
- 14.8% 10Y total return vs KLTO's -63.0%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 44.7% revenue growth vs KLTO's -49.0% | |
| Quality / Margins | 35.0% margin vs KLTO's -14.5% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.53 vs KLTO's 1.91 | |
| Dividends | 0.5% yield; 11-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +40.3% vs KLTO's -81.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 22.7% ROA vs KLTO's -112.1%, ROIC 41.8% vs -242.3% |
KLTO vs LLY — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
KLTO vs LLY — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
LLY leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
LLY and KLTO operate at a comparable scale, with $72.2B and $0 in trailing revenue.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $0 | $72.2B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$8M | $34.7B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$11M | $25.3B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$6M | $13.6B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | — | +83.5% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | — | +45.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | — | +35.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | — | +18.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +55.5% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +72.9% | +169.9% |
Valuation Metrics
KLTO leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $7M | $1.07T |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $8M | $1.11T |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -1.19x | 49.37x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 30.95x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 1.71x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 35.38x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | 16.42x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 6.19x | 38.34x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 119.31x |
Profitability & Efficiency
LLY leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
LLY delivers a 101.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $101 in annual profit, vs $-114 for KLTO. KLTO carries lower financial leverage with a 0.23x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to LLY's 1.60x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), LLY scores 8/9 vs KLTO's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -113.7% | +101.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -112.1% | +22.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -2.4% | +41.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -6.2% | +46.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 8 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.23x | 1.60x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $208,012 | $35.3B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $63,741 | $7.2B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $271,753 | $42.5B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -1.98x | 35.68x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
LLY leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in LLY five years ago would be worth $51,207 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,699 for KLTO. Over the past 12 months, LLY leads with a +40.3% total return vs KLTO's -81.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors LLY at 37.2% vs KLTO's -28.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +19.1% | +5.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -81.0% | +40.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -63.0% | +158.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -63.0% | +412.1% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -63.0% | +1484.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -28.2% | +37.2% |
Risk & Volatility
LLY leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
LLY is the less volatile stock with a 0.53 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than KLTO's 1.91 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. LLY currently trades 95.8% from its 52-week high vs KLTO's 15.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.91x | 0.53x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $2.45 | $1182.73 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.21 | $623.78 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +15.6% | +95.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 61.9 | 70.0 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 95K | 2.6M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
LLY is the only dividend payer here at 0.53% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $1268.94 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 45 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +0.5% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 11 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $6.00 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +1.6% | +0.4% |
LLY leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). KLTO leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics).
KLTO vs LLY: Frequently Asked Questions
7 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is KLTO or LLY a better buy right now?
Eli Lilly and Company (LLY) offers the better valuation at 49.
4x trailing P/E (30. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Eli Lilly and Company (LLY) a "Buy" — based on 45 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — KLTO or LLY?
Over the past 5 years, Eli Lilly and Company (LLY) delivered a total return of +412.
1%, compared to -63. 0% for Klotho Neurosciences, Inc. (KLTO). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: LLY returned +1485% versus KLTO's -63. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — KLTO or LLY?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Eli Lilly and Company (LLY) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
53β versus Klotho Neurosciences, Inc. 's 1. 91β — meaning KLTO is approximately 262% more volatile than LLY relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Klotho Neurosciences, Inc. (KLTO) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 23% versus 160% for Eli Lilly and Company — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which has better profit margins — KLTO or LLY?
Eli Lilly and Company (LLY) is the more profitable company, earning 31.
7% net margin versus 0. 0% for Klotho Neurosciences, Inc. — meaning it keeps 31. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: LLY leads at 45. 6% versus 0. 0% for KLTO. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — LLY leads at 83. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
05Which pays a better dividend — KLTO or LLY?
In this comparison, LLY (0.
5% yield) pays a dividend. KLTO does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
06Is KLTO or LLY better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Eli Lilly and Company (LLY) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
53), 0. 5% yield, +1485% 10Y return). Klotho Neurosciences, Inc. (KLTO) carries a higher beta of 1. 91 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (LLY: +1485%, KLTO: -63. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
07What are the main differences between KLTO and LLY?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: KLTO is a small-cap quality compounder stock; LLY is a mega-cap high-growth stock. LLY pays a dividend while KLTO does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.