Compare Stocks

2 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

KMT vs SPIR

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
KMT
Kennametal Inc.

Manufacturing - Tools & Accessories

IndustrialsNYSE • US
Market Cap$3.30B
5Y Perf.+23.7%
SPIR
Spire Global, Inc.

Specialty Business Services

IndustrialsNYSE • US
Market Cap$601.52B
5Y Perf.-76.8%

KMT vs SPIR — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
KMT logoKMT
SPIR logoSPIR
IndustryManufacturing - Tools & AccessoriesSpecialty Business Services
Market Cap$3.30B$601.52B
Revenue (TTM)$2.14B$72M
Net Income (TTM)$137M$-25.02B
Gross Margin31.9%40.8%
Operating Margin9.5%-121.4%
Forward P/E17.7x11.4x
Total Debt$643M$8.76B
Cash & Equiv.$141M$24.81B

KMT vs SPIRLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

KMT
SPIR
StockNov 20May 26Return
Kennametal Inc. (KMT)100123.7+23.7%
Spire Global, Inc. (SPIR)10023.2-76.8%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: KMT vs SPIR

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: KMT leads in 6 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and profitability and margin quality. Spire Global, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for valuation and capital efficiency. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
KMT
Kennametal Inc.
The Income Pick

KMT carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.

  • Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 1.31, yield 1.8%
  • Rev growth -3.9%, EPS growth -12.4%, 3Y rev CAGR -0.8%
  • 115.9% 10Y total return vs SPIR's -75.9%
Best for: income & stability and growth exposure
SPIR
Spire Global, Inc.
The Value Play

SPIR is the clearest fit if your priority is value.

  • Lower P/E (11.4x vs 17.7x)
Best for: value
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthKMT logoKMT-3.9% revenue growth vs SPIR's -35.2%
ValueSPIR logoSPIRLower P/E (11.4x vs 17.7x)
Quality / MarginsKMT logoKMT6.4% margin vs SPIR's -349.6%
Stability / SafetyKMT logoKMTBeta 1.31 vs SPIR's 2.93
DividendsKMT logoKMT1.8% yield; 2-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)KMT logoKMT+122.4% vs SPIR's +93.2%
Efficiency (ROA)KMT logoKMT5.3% ROA vs SPIR's -47.3%, ROIC 5.9% vs -0.1%

KMT vs SPIR — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

KMTKennametal Inc.
FY 2025
Metal Cutting
62.0%$1.2B
Infrastructure
38.0%$747M
SPIRSpire Global, Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

KMT vs SPIR — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLKMTLAGGINGSPIR

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

KMT leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

KMT is the larger business by revenue, generating $2.1B annually — 29.9x SPIR's $72M. KMT is the more profitable business, keeping 6.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SPIR's -349.6%. On growth, KMT holds the edge at +21.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricKMT logoKMTKennametal Inc.SPIR logoSPIRSpire Global, Inc.
RevenueTrailing 12 months$2.1B$72M
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$238M-$74M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$137M-$25.0B
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$73M-$16.2B
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+31.9%+40.8%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+9.5%-121.4%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+6.4%-349.6%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+3.4%-227.0%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+21.8%-26.9%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+82.9%+59.5%
KMT leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

KMT leads this category, winning 2 of 3 comparable metrics.

At 11.4x trailing earnings, SPIR trades at a 68% valuation discount to KMT's 36.1x P/E.

MetricKMT logoKMTKennametal Inc.SPIR logoSPIRSpire Global, Inc.
Market CapShares × price$3.3B$601.5B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$3.8B$585.5B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS36.06x11.37x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.17.74x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple13.59x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue1.68x8406.65x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share2.54x5.18x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF27.63x
KMT leads this category, winning 2 of 3 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

KMT leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

KMT delivers a 10.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $10 in annual profit, vs $-88 for SPIR. SPIR carries lower financial leverage with a 0.08x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to KMT's 0.49x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), KMT scores 6/9 vs SPIR's 5/9, reflecting solid financial health.

MetricKMT logoKMTKennametal Inc.SPIR logoSPIRSpire Global, Inc.
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+10.1%-88.4%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+5.3%-47.3%
ROICReturn on invested capital+5.9%-0.1%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+6.8%-0.1%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–965
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.49x0.08x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$503M-$16.1B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$141M$24.8B
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$643M$8.8B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense5.29x9.20x
KMT leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

Evenly matched — KMT and SPIR each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in KMT five years ago would be worth $11,287 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2,311 for SPIR. Over the past 12 months, KMT leads with a +122.4% total return vs SPIR's +93.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors SPIR at 50.1% vs KMT's 19.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricKMT logoKMTKennametal Inc.SPIR logoSPIRSpire Global, Inc.
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+49.9%+134.3%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+122.4%+93.2%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+69.6%+238.4%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+12.9%-76.9%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+115.9%-75.9%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+19.3%+50.1%
Evenly matched — KMT and SPIR each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

KMT leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

KMT is the less volatile stock with a 1.31 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SPIR's 2.93 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. KMT currently trades 98.8% from its 52-week high vs SPIR's 77.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricKMT logoKMTKennametal Inc.SPIR logoSPIRSpire Global, Inc.
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5001.31x2.93x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$43.81$23.59
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$17.62$6.60
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+98.8%+77.6%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10045.948.9
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded1.3M1.6M
KMT leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.

Wall Street rates KMT as "Hold" and SPIR as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply -5.7% upside for SPIR (target: $17) vs -16.8% for KMT (target: $36). KMT is the only dividend payer here at 1.84% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.

MetricKMT logoKMTKennametal Inc.SPIR logoSPIRSpire Global, Inc.
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellHoldBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$36.00$17.25
# AnalystsCovering analysts2312
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+1.8%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises2
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$0.79
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap+1.8%0.0%
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Key Takeaway

KMT leads in 4 of 6 categories — strongest in Income & Cash Flow and Valuation Metrics. 1 category is tied.

Best OverallKennametal Inc. (KMT)Leads 4 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

KMT vs SPIR: Frequently Asked Questions

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is KMT or SPIR a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Kennametal Inc.

(KMT) is the stronger pick with -3. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -35. 2% for Spire Global, Inc. (SPIR). Spire Global, Inc. (SPIR) offers the better valuation at 11. 4x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Spire Global, Inc. (SPIR) a "Buy" — based on 12 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — KMT or SPIR?

On trailing P/E, Spire Global, Inc.

(SPIR) is the cheapest at 11. 4x versus Kennametal Inc. at 36. 1x.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — KMT or SPIR?

Over the past 5 years, Kennametal Inc.

(KMT) delivered a total return of +12. 9%, compared to -76. 9% for Spire Global, Inc. (SPIR). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: KMT returned +115. 9% versus SPIR's -75. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — KMT or SPIR?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Kennametal Inc.

(KMT) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 31β versus Spire Global, Inc. 's 2. 93β — meaning SPIR is approximately 124% more volatile than KMT relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Spire Global, Inc. (SPIR) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 8% versus 49% for Kennametal Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — KMT or SPIR?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Kennametal Inc.

(KMT) is pulling ahead at -3. 9% versus -35. 2% for Spire Global, Inc. (SPIR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Spire Global, Inc. grew EPS 137. 8% year-over-year, compared to -12. 4% for Kennametal Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, SPIR leads at 0. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — KMT or SPIR?

Spire Global, Inc.

(SPIR) is the more profitable company, earning 71. 7% net margin versus 4. 7% for Kennametal Inc. — meaning it keeps 71. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: KMT leads at 7. 3% versus -121. 4% for SPIR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — SPIR leads at 40. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is KMT or SPIR more undervalued right now?

Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for SPIR: -5.

7% to $17. 25.

08

Which pays a better dividend — KMT or SPIR?

In this comparison, KMT (1.

8% yield) pays a dividend. SPIR does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

09

Is KMT or SPIR better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Kennametal Inc.

(KMT) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (1. 8% yield, +115. 9% 10Y return). Spire Global, Inc. (SPIR) carries a higher beta of 2. 93 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (KMT: +115. 9%, SPIR: -75. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between KMT and SPIR?

Both stocks operate in the Industrials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: KMT is a small-cap quality compounder stock; SPIR is a large-cap deep-value stock. KMT pays a dividend while SPIR does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.

Stocks Like

KMT

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Industrials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 10%
  • Net Margin > 5%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

SPIR

Quality Business

  • Sector: Industrials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 24%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform KMT and SPIR on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(KMT: 21.8% · SPIR: -26.9%)
P/E Ratio<
x
(KMT: 36.1x · SPIR: 11.4x)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.