Compare Stocks

2 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

KMT vs TDY

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
KMT
Kennametal Inc.

Manufacturing - Tools & Accessories

IndustrialsNYSE • US
Market Cap$3.30B
5Y Perf.+56.0%
TDY
Teledyne Technologies Incorporated

Hardware, Equipment & Parts

TechnologyNYSE • US
Market Cap$29.83B
5Y Perf.+72.2%

KMT vs TDY — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
KMT logoKMT
TDY logoTDY
IndustryManufacturing - Tools & AccessoriesHardware, Equipment & Parts
Market Cap$3.30B$29.83B
Revenue (TTM)$2.14B$6.27B
Net Income (TTM)$137M$950M
Gross Margin31.9%37.7%
Operating Margin9.5%19.1%
Forward P/E17.7x26.8x
Total Debt$643M$2.64B
Cash & Equiv.$141M$352M

KMT vs TDYLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

KMT
TDY
StockMay 20May 26Return
Kennametal Inc. (KMT)100156.0+56.0%
Teledyne Technologi… (TDY)100172.2+72.2%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: KMT vs TDY

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: TDY leads in 4 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and profitability and margin quality. Kennametal Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for valuation and capital efficiency and dividend income and shareholder returns. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
KMT
Kennametal Inc.
The Value Play

KMT is the clearest fit if your priority is value and dividends.

  • Lower P/E (17.7x vs 26.8x)
  • 1.8% yield; 2-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend
  • +122.4% vs TDY's +35.3%
Best for: value and dividends
TDY
Teledyne Technologies Incorporated
The Income Pick

TDY carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.

  • beta 0.95
  • Rev growth 7.9%, EPS growth 9.7%, 3Y rev CAGR 3.9%
  • 5.9% 10Y total return vs KMT's 115.9%
Best for: income & stability and growth exposure
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthTDY logoTDY7.9% revenue growth vs KMT's -3.9%
ValueKMT logoKMTLower P/E (17.7x vs 26.8x)
Quality / MarginsTDY logoTDY15.1% margin vs KMT's 6.4%
Stability / SafetyTDY logoTDYBeta 0.95 vs KMT's 1.31, lower leverage
DividendsKMT logoKMT1.8% yield; 2-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)KMT logoKMT+122.4% vs TDY's +35.3%
Efficiency (ROA)TDY logoTDY6.2% ROA vs KMT's 5.3%, ROIC 7.0% vs 5.9%

KMT vs TDY — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

KMTKennametal Inc.
FY 2025
Metal Cutting
62.0%$1.2B
Infrastructure
38.0%$747M
TDYTeledyne Technologies Incorporated
FY 2025
Digital Imaging
51.7%$3.2B
Instrumentation
23.8%$1.5B
Aerospace and Defense Electronics
17.3%$1.1B
Engineered Systems
7.1%$436M

KMT vs TDY — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLKMTLAGGINGTDY

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

TDY leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

TDY is the larger business by revenue, generating $6.3B annually — 2.9x KMT's $2.1B. TDY is the more profitable business, keeping 15.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to KMT's 6.4%. On growth, KMT holds the edge at +21.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricKMT logoKMTKennametal Inc.TDY logoTDYTeledyne Technolo…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$2.1B$6.3B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$238M$1.5B
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$137M$950M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$73M$1.1B
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+31.9%+37.7%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+9.5%+19.1%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+6.4%+15.1%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+3.4%+16.9%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+21.8%+7.6%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+82.9%+21.6%
TDY leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

KMT leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

At 34.1x trailing earnings, TDY trades at a 5% valuation discount to KMT's 36.1x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, KMT's 13.6x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than TDY's 21.6x.

MetricKMT logoKMTKennametal Inc.TDY logoTDYTeledyne Technolo…
Market CapShares × price$3.3B$29.8B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$3.8B$32.1B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS36.06x34.12x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.17.74x26.75x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate2.79x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple13.59x21.62x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue1.68x4.88x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share2.54x2.90x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF27.63x27.78x
KMT leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

TDY leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

KMT delivers a 10.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $10 in annual profit, vs $9 for TDY. TDY carries lower financial leverage with a 0.25x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to KMT's 0.49x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), TDY scores 7/9 vs KMT's 6/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricKMT logoKMTKennametal Inc.TDY logoTDYTeledyne Technolo…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+10.1%+8.9%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+5.3%+6.2%
ROICReturn on invested capital+5.9%+7.0%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+6.8%+8.7%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–967
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.49x0.25x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$503M$2.3B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$141M$352M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$643M$2.6B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense5.29x24.51x
TDY leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

KMT leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in TDY five years ago would be worth $14,846 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $11,287 for KMT. Over the past 12 months, KMT leads with a +122.4% total return vs TDY's +35.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors KMT at 19.3% vs TDY's 15.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricKMT logoKMTKennametal Inc.TDY logoTDYTeledyne Technolo…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+49.9%+24.2%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+122.4%+35.3%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+69.6%+55.8%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+12.9%+48.5%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+115.9%+585.8%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+19.3%+15.9%
KMT leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — KMT and TDY each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

TDY is the less volatile stock with a 0.95 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than KMT's 1.31 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. KMT currently trades 98.8% from its 52-week high vs TDY's 92.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricKMT logoKMTKennametal Inc.TDY logoTDYTeledyne Technolo…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5001.31x0.95x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$43.81$693.38
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$17.62$471.96
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+98.8%+92.9%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10045.946.1
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded1.3M305K
Evenly matched — KMT and TDY each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.

Wall Street rates KMT as "Hold" and TDY as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 10.4% upside for TDY (target: $711) vs -16.8% for KMT (target: $36). KMT is the only dividend payer here at 1.84% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.

MetricKMT logoKMTKennametal Inc.TDY logoTDYTeledyne Technolo…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellHoldBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$36.00$711.33
# AnalystsCovering analysts2318
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+1.8%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises2
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$0.79
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap+1.8%+1.4%
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Key Takeaway

TDY leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). KMT leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Total Returns). 1 tied.

Best OverallKennametal Inc. (KMT)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

KMT vs TDY: Frequently Asked Questions

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is KMT or TDY a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Teledyne Technologies Incorporated (TDY) is the stronger pick with 7.

9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -3. 9% for Kennametal Inc. (KMT). Teledyne Technologies Incorporated (TDY) offers the better valuation at 34. 1x trailing P/E (26. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Teledyne Technologies Incorporated (TDY) a "Buy" — based on 18 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — KMT or TDY?

On trailing P/E, Teledyne Technologies Incorporated (TDY) is the cheapest at 34.

1x versus Kennametal Inc. at 36. 1x. On forward P/E, Kennametal Inc. is actually cheaper at 17. 7x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — KMT or TDY?

Over the past 5 years, Teledyne Technologies Incorporated (TDY) delivered a total return of +48.

5%, compared to +12. 9% for Kennametal Inc. (KMT). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: TDY returned +585. 8% versus KMT's +115. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — KMT or TDY?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Teledyne Technologies Incorporated (TDY) is the lower-risk stock at 0.

95β versus Kennametal Inc. 's 1. 31β — meaning KMT is approximately 39% more volatile than TDY relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Teledyne Technologies Incorporated (TDY) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 25% versus 49% for Kennametal Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — KMT or TDY?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Teledyne Technologies Incorporated (TDY) is pulling ahead at 7.

9% versus -3. 9% for Kennametal Inc. (KMT). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Teledyne Technologies Incorporated grew EPS 9. 7% year-over-year, compared to -12. 4% for Kennametal Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, TDY leads at 3. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — KMT or TDY?

Teledyne Technologies Incorporated (TDY) is the more profitable company, earning 14.

6% net margin versus 4. 7% for Kennametal Inc. — meaning it keeps 14. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: TDY leads at 18. 8% versus 7. 3% for KMT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — TDY leads at 39. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is KMT or TDY more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, Kennametal Inc.

(KMT) trades at 17. 7x forward P/E versus 26. 8x for Teledyne Technologies Incorporated — 9. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for TDY: 10. 4% to $711. 33.

08

Which pays a better dividend — KMT or TDY?

In this comparison, KMT (1.

8% yield) pays a dividend. TDY does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

09

Is KMT or TDY better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Teledyne Technologies Incorporated (TDY) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.

95), +585. 8% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (TDY: +585. 8%, KMT: +115. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between KMT and TDY?

These companies operate in different sectors (KMT (Industrials) and TDY (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

KMT pays a dividend while TDY does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.

Stocks Like

KMT

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Industrials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 10%
  • Net Margin > 5%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

TDY

Steady Growth Compounder

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Net Margin > 9%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform KMT and TDY on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(KMT: 21.8% · TDY: 7.6%)
Net Margin>
%
(KMT: 6.4% · TDY: 15.1%)
P/E Ratio<
x
(KMT: 36.1x · TDY: 34.1x)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.