Communication Equipment
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
KN vs MTSI
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Semiconductors
KN vs MTSI — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Communication Equipment | Semiconductors |
| Market Cap | $2.89B | $25.84B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $461M | $1.07B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $46M | $177M |
| Gross Margin | 56.7% | 55.3% |
| Operating Margin | 17.7% | 16.0% |
| Forward P/E | 26.2x | 76.9x |
| Total Debt | $150M | $538M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $54M | $112M |
KN vs MTSI — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Knowles Corporation (KN) | 100 | 224.7 | +124.7% |
| MACOM Technology So… (MTSI) | 100 | 1084.9 | +984.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: KN vs MTSI
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
KN is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 1.62, yield 0.2%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.62, Low D/E 19.4%, current ratio 2.75x
- Beta 1.62, yield 0.2%, current ratio 2.75x
MTSI carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 32.6%, EPS growth -170.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 12.7%
- 8.0% 10Y total return vs KN's 160.4%
- 32.6% revenue growth vs KN's 7.2%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 32.6% revenue growth vs KN's 7.2% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (26.2x vs 76.9x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 16.5% margin vs KN's 10.0% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.62 vs MTSI's 1.75, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 0.2% yield; 1-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +203.8% vs KN's +111.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 8.6% ROA vs KN's 4.3%, ROIC 6.0% vs 6.8% |
KN vs MTSI — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
KN vs MTSI — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
KN leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MTSI is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.1B annually — 2.3x KN's $461M. MTSI is the more profitable business, keeping 16.5% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to KN's 10.0%. On growth, MTSI holds the edge at +22.5% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $461M | $1.1B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $144M | $210M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $46M | $177M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $73M | $168M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +56.7% | +55.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +17.7% | +16.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +10.0% | +16.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +15.9% | +15.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -100.0% | +22.5% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +42.9% |
Valuation Metrics
KN leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, KN's 26.2x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than MTSI's 136.1x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $2.9B | $25.8B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $3.0B | $26.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 67.60x | -471.88x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 26.15x | 76.91x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.91x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 26.20x | 136.13x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 4.87x | 26.71x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 3.80x | 19.20x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 35.30x | 134.01x |
Profitability & Efficiency
KN leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
MTSI delivers a 13.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $13 in annual profit, vs $6 for KN. KN carries lower financial leverage with a 0.19x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to MTSI's 0.41x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), KN scores 9/9 vs MTSI's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +6.1% | +13.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +4.3% | +8.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +6.8% | +6.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +8.3% | +7.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 9 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.19x | 0.41x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $96M | $426M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $54M | $112M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $150M | $538M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 8.62x | 391.47x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
MTSI leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in MTSI five years ago would be worth $61,359 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $16,504 for KN. Over the past 12 months, MTSI leads with a +203.8% total return vs KN's +111.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors MTSI at 84.4% vs KN's 29.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +54.0% | +96.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +111.0% | +203.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +115.0% | +526.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +65.0% | +513.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +160.4% | +795.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +29.1% | +84.4% |
Risk & Volatility
KN leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
KN is the less volatile stock with a 1.62 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than MTSI's 1.75 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.62x | 1.75x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $34.67 | $355.00 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $15.85 | $110.09 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +97.5% | +97.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 75.7 | 71.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 649K | 1.1M |
Analyst Outlook
KN leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates KN as "Buy" and MTSI as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 13.9% upside for KN (target: $39) vs -26.3% for MTSI (target: $254). KN is the only dividend payer here at 0.21% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $38.50 | $254.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 15 | 23 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +0.2% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.07 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +2.2% | +0.2% |
KN leads in 5 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). MTSI leads in 1 (Total Returns).
KN vs MTSI: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is KN or MTSI a better buy right now?
For growth investors, MACOM Technology Solutions Holdings, Inc.
(MTSI) is the stronger pick with 32. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 7. 2% for Knowles Corporation (KN). Knowles Corporation (KN) offers the better valuation at 67. 6x trailing P/E (26. 2x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Knowles Corporation (KN) a "Buy" — based on 15 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — KN or MTSI?
On forward P/E, Knowles Corporation is actually cheaper at 26.
2x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — KN or MTSI?
Over the past 5 years, MACOM Technology Solutions Holdings, Inc.
(MTSI) delivered a total return of +513. 6%, compared to +65. 0% for Knowles Corporation (KN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: MTSI returned +795. 9% versus KN's +160. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — KN or MTSI?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Knowles Corporation (KN) is the lower-risk stock at 1.
62β versus MACOM Technology Solutions Holdings, Inc. 's 1. 75β — meaning MTSI is approximately 8% more volatile than KN relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Knowles Corporation (KN) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 19% versus 41% for MACOM Technology Solutions Holdings, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — KN or MTSI?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), MACOM Technology Solutions Holdings, Inc.
(MTSI) is pulling ahead at 32. 6% versus 7. 2% for Knowles Corporation (KN). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Knowles Corporation grew EPS 118. 7% year-over-year, compared to -170. 2% for MACOM Technology Solutions Holdings, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, MTSI leads at 12. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — KN or MTSI?
Knowles Corporation (KN) is the more profitable company, earning 7.
5% net margin versus -5. 6% for MACOM Technology Solutions Holdings, Inc. — meaning it keeps 7. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MTSI leads at 13. 4% versus 13. 1% for KN. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — MTSI leads at 54. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is KN or MTSI more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Knowles Corporation (KN) trades at 26.
2x forward P/E versus 76. 9x for MACOM Technology Solutions Holdings, Inc. — 50. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for KN: 13. 9% to $38. 50.
08Which pays a better dividend — KN or MTSI?
In this comparison, KN (0.
2% yield) pays a dividend. MTSI does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is KN or MTSI better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, MACOM Technology Solutions Holdings, Inc.
(MTSI) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (+795. 9% 10Y return). Knowles Corporation (KN) carries a higher beta of 1. 62 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (MTSI: +795. 9%, KN: +160. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between KN and MTSI?
Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: KN is a small-cap quality compounder stock; MTSI is a mid-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.