KNOP vs TK

For growth investors, KNOT Offshore Partners LP (KNOP) is the stronger pick with 7.

5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -16. 7% for Teekay Corporation (TK). Teekay Corporation (TK) offers the better valuation at 9. 6x trailing P/E (64. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate KNOT Offshore Partners LP (KNOP) a "Buy" — based on 12 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

On trailing P/E, Teekay Corporation (TK) is the cheapest at 9.

6x versus KNOT Offshore Partners LP at 53. 1x. On forward P/E, KNOT Offshore Partners LP is actually cheaper at 7. 6x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.

Over the past 5 years, Teekay Corporation (TK) delivered a total return of +422.

5%, compared to -23. 8% for KNOT Offshore Partners LP (KNOP). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: TK returned +97. 1% versus KNOP's +45. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), KNOT Offshore Partners LP (KNOP) is the lower-risk stock at 0.

36β versus Teekay Corporation's 0. 38β — meaning TK is approximately 6% more volatile than KNOP relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Teekay Corporation (TK) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 3% versus 148% for KNOT Offshore Partners LP — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), KNOT Offshore Partners LP (KNOP) is pulling ahead at 7.

5% versus -16. 7% for Teekay Corporation (TK). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: KNOT Offshore Partners LP grew EPS 120. 4% year-over-year, compared to -7. 8% for Teekay Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, TK leads at 21. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

Teekay Corporation (TK) is the more profitable company, earning 11.

0% net margin versus 4. 5% for KNOT Offshore Partners LP — meaning it keeps 11. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: TK leads at 29. 9% versus 23. 3% for KNOP. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — KNOP leads at 64. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

On forward earnings alone, KNOT Offshore Partners LP (KNOP) trades at 7.

6x forward P/E versus 64. 0x for Teekay Corporation — 56. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis.

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

Teekay Corporation (TK) offers the highest yield at 6. 7%, versus 2. 7% for KNOT Offshore Partners LP (KNOP).

For long-horizon retirement investors, Teekay Corporation (TK) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.

38), 6. 7% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (TK: +97. 1%, KNOP: +45. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

These companies operate in different sectors (KNOP (Industrials) and TK (Energy)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: KNOP is a small-cap quality compounder stock; TK is a small-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.