KNTK
Kinetik Holdings Inc.
Oil & Gas Midstream
Market Cap$3.33B
5Y Perf.+589.0%
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Try these comparisons:
Stock Comparison
KNTK vs DKL vs MPLX vs EPD vs ET
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
DKL
Delek Logistics Partners, LP
Oil & Gas Midstream
Market Cap$2.71B
5Y Perf.+114.4%
MPLX
MPLX Lp
Oil & Gas Midstream
Market Cap$57.12B
5Y Perf.+184.4%
EPD
Enterprise Products Partners L.P.
Oil & Gas Midstream
Market Cap$81.56B
5Y Perf.+94.7%
ET
Energy Transfer LP
Oil & Gas Midstream
Market Cap$68.53B
5Y Perf.+137.0%
KNTK vs DKL vs MPLX vs EPD vs ET — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | KNTK | DKL | MPLX | EPD | ET |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Oil & Gas Midstream | Oil & Gas Midstream | Oil & Gas Midstream | Oil & Gas Midstream | Oil & Gas Midstream |
| Market Cap | $3.33B | $2.71B | $57.12B | $81.56B | $68.53B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.73B | $1.06B | $12.54B | $52.60B | $89.38B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $228M | $170M | $4.71B | $5.80B | $5.55B |
| Gross Margin | 24.8% | 19.2% | 60.0% | 13.6% | 22.9% |
| Operating Margin | 8.2% | 16.5% | 44.9% | 13.5% | 11.1% |
| Forward P/E | 42.4x | 14.6x | 12.3x | 12.9x | 12.7x |
| Total Debt | $3.87B | $35M | $26.16B | $34.93B | $71.61B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $4M | $11M | $2.14B | $1.25B | $1.27B |
KNTK vs DKL vs MPLX vs EPD vs ET — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
KNTK
DKL
MPLX
EPD
ET
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Kinetik Holdings In… (KNTK) | 100 | 689.0 | +589.0% |
| Delek Logistics Par… (DKL) | 100 | 214.4 | +114.4% |
| MPLX Lp (MPLX) | 100 | 284.4 | +184.4% |
| Enterprise Products… (EPD) | 100 | 194.7 | +94.7% |
| Energy Transfer LP (ET) | 100 | 237.0 | +137.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: KNTK vs DKL vs MPLX vs EPD vs ET
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: MPLX leads in 3 of 7 categories (5-stock set), making it the strongest pick for valuation and capital efficiency and profitability and margin quality. Kinetik Holdings Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion and dividend income and shareholder returns. DKL and EPD also each lead in at least one category. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
KNTK
Kinetik Holdings Inc.
The Growth Play
KNTK is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.
- Rev growth 19.0%, EPS growth 157.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 13.3%
- 19.0% revenue growth vs EPD's -6.4%
- 16.5% yield, 3-year raise streak, vs EPD's 5.7%
Best for: growth exposure
DKL
Delek Logistics Partners, LP
The Income Pick
DKL ranks third and is worth considering specifically for income & stability.
- Dividend streak 5 yrs, beta 0.35, yield 8.7%
- +45.1% vs MPLX's +22.5%
Best for: income & stability
MPLX
MPLX Lp
The Long-Run Compounder
MPLX carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding and defensive.
- 184.4% 10Y total return vs ET's 142.6%
- Beta 0.18, yield 7.0%, current ratio 1.23x
- Lower P/E (12.3x vs 12.7x)
- 37.5% margin vs ET's 6.2%
Best for: long-term compounding and defensive
EPD
Enterprise Products Partners L.P.
The Defensive Pick
EPD is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.06, current ratio 1.04x
- Beta 0.06 vs KNTK's 0.60, lower leverage
Best for: sleep-well-at-night
ET
Energy Transfer LP
The Income Angle
Among these 5 stocks, ET doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
Best for: energy exposure
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | KNTK | 19.0% revenue growth vs EPD's -6.4% |
| Value | MPLX | Lower P/E (12.3x vs 12.7x) |
| Quality / Margins | MPLX | 37.5% margin vs ET's 6.2% |
| Stability / Safety | EPD | Beta 0.06 vs KNTK's 0.60, lower leverage |
| Dividends | KNTK | 16.5% yield, 3-year raise streak, vs EPD's 5.7% |
| Momentum (1Y) | DKL | +45.1% vs MPLX's +22.5% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | MPLX | 11.3% ROA vs ET's 4.1%, ROIC 9.9% vs 6.3% |
KNTK vs DKL vs MPLX vs EPD vs ET — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
FY 2025
FY 2023
FY 2025
FY 2025
FY 2024
KNTK vs DKL vs MPLX vs EPD vs ET — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLMPLXLAGGINGET
Who Leads Where
MPLX leads in 2 of 6 categories
DKL leads 1 • KNTK leads 0 • EPD leads 0 • ET leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓ETEnergy Transfer LP
0leads
EPDEnterprise Products P…
0leads
KNTKKinetik Holdings Inc.
0leads
DKLDelek Logistics Partn…
1leads
MPLXMPLX Lp
2leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs DKLvs KNTKMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
MPLX4/6
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
MPLX3/6
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
DKL4/9
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
Tied
—
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
Tied
—
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
Tied
—
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MPLX leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ET is the larger business by revenue, generating $89.4B annually — 84.2x DKL's $1.1B. MPLX is the more profitable business, keeping 37.5% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to ET's 6.2%. On growth, ET holds the edge at +32.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | KNTKKinetik Holdings … | DKLDelek Logistics P… | MPLXMPLX Lp | EPDEnterprise Produc… | ETEnergy Transfer LP |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.7B | $1.1B | $12.5B | $52.6B | $89.4B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $534M | $310M | $7.0B | $9.7B | $15.5B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $228M | $170M | $4.7B | $5.8B | $5.6B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $441M | $112M | $5.0B | $3.0B | $5.5B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +24.8% | +19.2% | +60.0% | +13.6% | +22.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +8.2% | +16.5% | +44.9% | +13.5% | +11.1% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +13.2% | +16.0% | +37.5% | +11.0% | +6.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +25.5% | +10.6% | +39.8% | +5.6% | +6.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -7.5% | +19.0% | +5.2% | -2.9% | +32.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -2.4% | -17.8% | -17.3% | +2.7% | -2.8% |
MPLX leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
MPLX leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 11.7x trailing earnings, MPLX trades at a 37% valuation discount to KNTK's 18.4x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, DKL's 8.8x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than MPLX's 13.3x.
| Metric | KNTKKinetik Holdings … | DKLDelek Logistics P… | MPLXMPLX Lp | EPDEnterprise Produc… | ETEnergy Transfer LP |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $3.3B | $2.7B | $57.1B | $81.6B | $68.5B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $7.2B | $2.7B | $81.1B | $115.2B | $138.9B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 18.43x | 15.46x | 11.67x | 14.18x | 14.76x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 42.44x | 14.60x | 12.33x | 12.94x | 12.68x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | 1.54x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 13.14x | 8.81x | 13.27x | 12.10x | 9.41x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.89x | 2.68x | 4.83x | 1.55x | 0.83x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.04x | 446.88x | 3.95x | 2.70x | 1.48x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 44.78x | — | 13.93x | 27.51x | 17.82x |
MPLX leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
DKL leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
DKL delivers a 19.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $19 in annual profit, vs $12 for ET. EPD carries lower financial leverage with a 1.14x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to DKL's 5.75x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), MPLX scores 6/9 vs DKL's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | KNTKKinetik Holdings … | DKLDelek Logistics P… | MPLXMPLX Lp | EPDEnterprise Produc… | ETEnergy Transfer LP |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +21.1% | +19.2% | +32.8% | +19.3% | +11.6% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +4.2% | +6.1% | +11.3% | +7.5% | +4.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +1.9% | +14.1% | +9.9% | +8.3% | +6.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +2.5% | +8.3% | +12.9% | +10.9% | +7.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 4 | 6 | 6 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.32x | 5.75x | 1.80x | 1.14x | 1.45x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $3.9B | $24M | $24.0B | $33.7B | $70.3B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $4M | $11M | $2.1B | $1.2B | $1.3B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $3.9B | $35M | $26.2B | $34.9B | $71.6B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 5.98x | 1.66x | 5.85x | 5.21x | 2.64x |
DKL leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — DKL and MPLX each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in ET five years ago would be worth $25,821 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $18,598 for DKL. Over the past 12 months, DKL leads with a +45.1% total return vs MPLX's +22.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors MPLX at 25.1% vs DKL's 13.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | KNTKKinetik Holdings … | DKLDelek Logistics P… | MPLXMPLX Lp | EPDEnterprise Produc… | ETEnergy Transfer LP |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +37.4% | +13.4% | +6.4% | +20.7% | +22.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +28.0% | +45.1% | +22.5% | +31.7% | +25.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +93.9% | +45.6% | +95.7% | +73.8% | +90.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +93.1% | +86.0% | +157.2% | +105.7% | +158.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -33.5% | +207.3% | +184.4% | +119.8% | +142.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +24.7% | +13.3% | +25.1% | +20.2% | +23.9% |
Evenly matched — DKL and MPLX each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — EPD and ET each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
EPD is the less volatile stock with a 0.06 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than KNTK's 0.60 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. ET currently trades 96.4% from its 52-week high vs DKL's 91.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | KNTKKinetik Holdings … | DKLDelek Logistics P… | MPLXMPLX Lp | EPDEnterprise Produc… | ETEnergy Transfer LP |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.50x | 0.34x | 0.11x | -0.00x | 0.10x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $51.11 | $55.89 | $59.98 | $39.73 | $20.66 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $31.33 | $37.50 | $47.80 | $29.90 | $16.18 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +94.8% | +91.3% | +93.8% | +95.0% | +96.4% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 51.3 | 50.0 | 46.5 | 47.0 | 59.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.2M | 64K | 1.8M | 4.1M | 14.8M |
Evenly matched — EPD and ET each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — KNTK and EPD each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: KNTK as "Buy", DKL as "Hold", MPLX as "Buy", EPD as "Buy", ET as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 9.8% upside for DKL (target: $56) vs -4.6% for ET (target: $19). For income investors, KNTK offers the higher dividend yield at 16.47% vs EPD's 5.67%.
| Metric | KNTKKinetik Holdings … | DKLDelek Logistics P… | MPLXMPLX Lp | EPDEnterprise Produc… | ETEnergy Transfer LP |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $47.57 | $56.00 | $60.20 | $37.00 | $19.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 15 | 10 | 28 | 45 | 32 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +16.5% | +8.7% | +7.0% | +5.7% | +6.5% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 3 | 5 | 3 | 15 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $7.98 | $4.45 | $3.94 | $2.14 | $1.29 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +5.3% | +0.4% | +0.7% | +0.4% | 0.0% |
Evenly matched — KNTK and EPD each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway
MPLX leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). DKL leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 3 tied.
Best OverallMPLX Lp (MPLX)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
KNTK vs DKL vs MPLX vs EPD vs ET: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is KNTK or DKL or MPLX or EPD or ET a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Kinetik Holdings Inc.
(KNTK) is the stronger pick with 19. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -6. 4% for Enterprise Products Partners L. P. (EPD). MPLX Lp (MPLX) offers the better valuation at 11. 7x trailing P/E (12. 3x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Kinetik Holdings Inc. (KNTK) a "Buy" — based on 15 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — KNTK or DKL or MPLX or EPD or ET?
On trailing P/E, MPLX Lp (MPLX) is the cheapest at 11.
7x versus Kinetik Holdings Inc. at 18. 4x. On forward P/E, MPLX Lp is actually cheaper at 12. 3x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — KNTK or DKL or MPLX or EPD or ET?
Over the past 5 years, Energy Transfer LP (ET) delivered a total return of +158.
2%, compared to +86. 0% for Delek Logistics Partners, LP (DKL). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: DKL returned +207. 4% versus KNTK's -34. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — KNTK or DKL or MPLX or EPD or ET?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Enterprise Products Partners L.
P. (EPD) is the lower-risk stock at -0. 00β versus Kinetik Holdings Inc. 's 0. 50β — meaning KNTK is approximately -12660% more volatile than EPD relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Enterprise Products Partners L. P. (EPD) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 114% versus 6% for Delek Logistics Partners, LP — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — KNTK or DKL or MPLX or EPD or ET?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Kinetik Holdings Inc.
(KNTK) is pulling ahead at 19. 0% versus -6. 4% for Enterprise Products Partners L. P. (EPD). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Kinetik Holdings Inc. grew EPS 157. 8% year-over-year, compared to -1. 1% for Enterprise Products Partners L. P.. Over a 3-year CAGR, KNTK leads at 13. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — KNTK or DKL or MPLX or EPD or ET?
MPLX Lp (MPLX) is the more profitable company, earning 41.
6% net margin versus 5. 9% for Energy Transfer LP — meaning it keeps 41. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MPLX leads at 40. 3% versus 9. 3% for KNTK. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — MPLX leads at 45. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is KNTK or DKL or MPLX or EPD or ET more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, MPLX Lp (MPLX) trades at 12.
3x forward P/E versus 42. 4x for Kinetik Holdings Inc. — 30. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for DKL: 9. 8% to $56. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — KNTK or DKL or MPLX or EPD or ET?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Kinetik Holdings Inc. (KNTK) offers the highest yield at 16. 5%, versus 5. 7% for Enterprise Products Partners L. P. (EPD).
09Is KNTK or DKL or MPLX or EPD or ET better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Enterprise Products Partners L.
P. (EPD) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0. 00), 5. 7% yield, +117. 7% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (EPD: +117. 7%, KNTK: -34. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between KNTK and DKL and MPLX and EPD and ET?
Both stocks operate in the Energy sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: KNTK is a small-cap high-growth stock; DKL is a small-cap deep-value stock; MPLX is a mid-cap deep-value stock; EPD is a mid-cap deep-value stock; ET is a mid-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
Revenue Growth>
%
(KNTK: -7.5% · DKL: 19.0%)Net Margin>
%
(KNTK: 13.2% · DKL: 16.0%)P/E Ratio<
x
(KNTK: 18.4x · DKL: 15.5x)You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.