KODK vs XRX

For growth investors, Xerox Holdings Corporation (XRX) is the stronger pick with 12.

9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 2. 5% for Eastman Kodak Company (KODK). Analysts rate Xerox Holdings Corporation (XRX) a "Sell" — based on 5 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

Over the past 5 years, Eastman Kodak Company (KODK) delivered a total return of +111.

2%, compared to -72. 9% for Xerox Holdings Corporation (XRX). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: KODK returned +21. 0% versus XRX's -42. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Eastman Kodak Company (KODK) is the lower-risk stock at 1.

68β versus Xerox Holdings Corporation's 2. 68β — meaning XRX is approximately 60% more volatile than KODK relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Eastman Kodak Company (KODK) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 35% versus 6% for Xerox Holdings Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Xerox Holdings Corporation (XRX) is pulling ahead at 12.

9% versus 2. 5% for Eastman Kodak Company (KODK). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Xerox Holdings Corporation grew EPS 23. 3% year-over-year, compared to -297. 8% for Eastman Kodak Company. Over a 3-year CAGR, XRX leads at -0. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

Eastman Kodak Company (KODK) is the more profitable company, earning -12.

0% net margin versus -14. 7% for Xerox Holdings Corporation — meaning it keeps -12. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: KODK leads at 2. 3% versus -0. 8% for XRX. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — XRX leads at 27. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

Xerox Holdings Corporation (XRX) offers the highest yield at 21. 4%, versus 0. 2% for Eastman Kodak Company (KODK).

For long-horizon retirement investors, Xerox Holdings Corporation (XRX) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (21.

4% yield). Eastman Kodak Company (KODK) carries a higher beta of 1. 68 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (XRX: -42. 2%, KODK: +21. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

These companies operate in different sectors (KODK (Industrials) and XRX (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: KODK is a small-cap quality compounder stock; XRX is a small-cap income-oriented stock. XRX pays a dividend while KODK does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.