KOF vs WMT

For growth investors, Walmart Inc.

(WMT) is the stronger pick with 4. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 4. 3% for Coca-Cola FEMSA, S. A. B. de C. V. (KOF). Coca-Cola FEMSA, S. A. B. de C. V. (KOF) offers the better valuation at 30. 9x trailing P/E (0. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Coca-Cola FEMSA, S. A. B. de C. V. (KOF) a "Buy" — based on 11 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

On trailing P/E, Coca-Cola FEMSA, S.

A. B. de C. V. (KOF) is the cheapest at 30. 9x versus Walmart Inc. at 47. 7x. On forward P/E, Coca-Cola FEMSA, S. A. B. de C. V. is actually cheaper at 0. 8x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Coca-Cola FEMSA, S. A. B. de C. V. wins at 0. 22x versus Walmart Inc. 's 4. 06x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.

Over the past 5 years, Walmart Inc.

(WMT) delivered a total return of +186. 9%, compared to +157. 6% for Coca-Cola FEMSA, S. A. B. de C. V. (KOF). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: WMT returned +499. 5% versus KOF's +59. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Walmart Inc.

(WMT) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 12β versus Coca-Cola FEMSA, S. A. B. de C. V. 's 0. 42β — meaning KOF is approximately 259% more volatile than WMT relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Coca-Cola FEMSA, S. A. B. de C. V. (KOF) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 54% versus 67% for Walmart Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Walmart Inc.

(WMT) is pulling ahead at 4. 7% versus 4. 3% for Coca-Cola FEMSA, S. A. B. de C. V. (KOF). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Walmart Inc. grew EPS 13. 3% year-over-year, compared to -47. 7% for Coca-Cola FEMSA, S. A. B. de C. V.. Over a 3-year CAGR, KOF leads at 8. 8% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

Coca-Cola FEMSA, S.

A. B. de C. V. (KOF) is the more profitable company, earning 8. 2% net margin versus 3. 1% for Walmart Inc. — meaning it keeps 8. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: KOF leads at 13. 9% versus 4. 2% for WMT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — KOF leads at 45. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, Coca-Cola FEMSA, S. A. B. de C. V. (KOF) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 22x versus Walmart Inc. 's 4. 06x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Coca-Cola FEMSA, S. A. B. de C. V. (KOF) trades at 0. 8x forward P/E versus 44. 7x for Walmart Inc. — 43. 9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for WMT: 5. 3% to $137. 04.

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

Coca-Cola FEMSA, S. A. B. de C. V. (KOF) offers the highest yield at 38. 4%, versus 0. 7% for Walmart Inc. (WMT).

For long-horizon retirement investors, Walmart Inc.

(WMT) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 12), 0. 7% yield, +499. 5% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (WMT: +499. 5%, KOF: +59. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

Both stocks operate in the Consumer Defensive sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: KOF is a small-cap income-oriented stock; WMT is a mega-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.