Comprehensive Stock Comparison
Compare Coca-Cola FEMSA, S.A.B. de C.V. (KOF) vs Walmart Inc. (WMT) Stock
Analyze side-by-side fundamentals, valuation, growth, and profitability to decide which stock is the better buy.
Selected Stocks
Add up to 10 tickers. Use presets or search to get started.
Quick Verdict
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | WMT | 4.7% revenue growth vs KOF's 4.3% |
| Value | KOF | Lower P/E (0.9x vs 43.8x), PEG 0.05 vs 3.98 |
| Quality / Margins | KOF | 8.1% net margin vs WMT's 3.3% |
| Stability / Safety | KOF | Beta 0.29 vs WMT's 0.53, lower leverage |
| Dividends | WMT | 0.7% yield; 37-year raise streak; KOF pays no meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | WMT | +30.7% vs KOF's +28.8% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | WMT | 7.9% ROA vs KOF's 7.6%, ROIC 14.7% vs 15.9% |
Who Each Stock Is For
Income & stability
Growth exposure
Long-term compounding (10Y)
Sleep-well-at-night portfolio
Valuation efficiency (growth/$)
Defensive / Recession hedge
Business Model
What each company does and how it makes money
Coca-Cola FEMSA is the world's largest Coca-Cola franchise bottler, producing and distributing Coca-Cola trademark beverages across Latin America. It generates revenue primarily from beverage sales—sparkling drinks, waters, juices, and other non-alcoholic beverages—with additional income from distributing Heineken beer in Brazil. Its key advantage is exclusive territorial rights to produce and sell Coca-Cola products in its operating regions, backed by the world's most valuable beverage brand.
Walmart is the world's largest retailer operating a vast network of physical stores and e-commerce platforms. It generates revenue primarily through retail sales — with Walmart U.S. contributing about 65% of total revenue, Walmart International around 20%, and Sam's Club membership warehouse clubs roughly 15%. Its key competitive advantage is massive scale and supply chain efficiency, enabling everyday low prices that competitors struggle to match.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Financial Metrics Comparison
Side-by-side fundamentals across 2 stocks. BestLagging
Financial Scorecard
WMT leads in 3 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). KOF leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Risk & Volatility). 1 tied.
Financial Metrics (TTM)
WMT is the larger business by revenue, generating $703.1B annually — 2.4x KOF's $292.7B. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 8.1% (KOF) to 3.3% (WMT). On growth, WMT holds the edge at +5.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | KOFCoca-Cola FEMSA, … | WMTWalmart Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $292.7B | $703.1B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $48.4B | $42.8B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $23.9B | $22.9B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $6.1B | $15.3B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +45.6% | +24.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +14.7% | +4.1% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +8.1% | +3.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +2.1% | +2.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +2.4% | +5.8% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +2.9% | +35.1% |
Valuation Metrics
At 16.9x trailing earnings, KOF trades at a 64% valuation discount to WMT's 46.9x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), KOF offers better value at 0.92x vs WMT's 4.26x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | KOFCoca-Cola FEMSA, … | WMTWalmart Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $23.4B | $1.02T |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $26.5B | $1.08T |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 16.87x | 46.87x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 0.87x | 43.76x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.92x | 4.26x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 8.22x | 24.44x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.38x | 1.43x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.61x | 10.27x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 24.53x |
Profitability & Efficiency
WMT delivers a 22.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $22 in annual profit, vs $15 for KOF. KOF carries lower financial leverage with a 0.54x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to WMT's 0.67x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), WMT scores 6/9 vs KOF's 2/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | KOFCoca-Cola FEMSA, … | WMTWalmart Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +15.5% | +22.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +7.6% | +7.9% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +15.9% | +14.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +17.6% | +17.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 2 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.54x | 0.67x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $54.6B | $56.4B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $28.1B | $10.7B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $82.7B | $67.1B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 7.61x | 11.85x |
Total Returns (with DRIP)
A $10,000 investment in WMT five years ago would be worth $30,135 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $29,202 for KOF. Over the past 12 months, WMT leads with a +30.7% total return vs KOF's +28.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors WMT at 40.2% vs KOF's 19.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | KOFCoca-Cola FEMSA, … | WMTWalmart Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +17.2% | +13.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +28.8% | +30.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +68.4% | +175.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +192.0% | +201.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +84.7% | +512.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +19.0% | +40.2% |
Risk & Volatility
KOF is the less volatile stock with a 0.29 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than WMT's 0.53 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500.
| Metric | KOFCoca-Cola FEMSA, … | WMTWalmart Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.29x | 0.53x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $116.36 | $134.69 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $80.22 | $79.81 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +95.5% | +95.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 55.3 | 49.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 156K | 29.5M |
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates KOF as "Buy" and WMT as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 6.5% upside for WMT (target: $136) vs -0.1% for KOF (target: $111). WMT is the only dividend payer here at 0.73% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | KOFCoca-Cola FEMSA, … | WMTWalmart Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $111.00 | $136.31 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 11 | 64 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +0.7% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 7 | 37 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.94 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.8% |
Historical Charts
Charts are rendered on first load. Hover for details.
Chart 1Total Return — 5 Years (Rebased to 100)
| Stock | Mar 20 | Feb 26 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coca-Cola FEMSA, S.… (KOF) | 100 | 186.59 | +86.6% |
| Walmart Inc. (WMT) | 100 | 321.15 | +221.1% |
Walmart Inc. (WMT) returned +201% over 5 years vs Coca-Cola FEMSA, S.… (KOF)'s +192%. A $10,000 investment in WMT 5 years ago would be worth $30,135 today (including dividends reinvested).
Chart 2Revenue Growth — 10 Years
| Stock | 2017 | 2026 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coca-Cola FEMSA, S.… (KOF) | $183.3B | $291.7B | +59.2% |
| Walmart Inc. (WMT) | $485.9B | $713.2B | +46.8% |
Walmart Inc.'s revenue grew from $485.9B (2017) to $713.2B (2026) — a 4.4% CAGR.
Chart 3Net Margin Trend — 10 Years
| Stock | 2017 | 2026 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coca-Cola FEMSA, S.… (KOF) | -7.0% | 8.2% | +217.0% |
| Walmart Inc. (WMT) | 2.8% | 3.1% | +9.3% |
Walmart Inc.'s net margin went from 3% (2017) to 3% (2026).
Chart 4P/E Ratio History — 10 Years
| Stock | 2017 | 2026 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coca-Cola FEMSA, S.… (KOF) | 0.9 | 0.8 | -11.1% |
| Walmart Inc. (WMT) | 22.5 | 46.9 | +108.4% |
Coca-Cola FEMSA, S.A.B. de C.V. has traded in a 1x–1x P/E range over 8 years; current trailing P/E is ~17x. Walmart Inc. has traded in a 23x–53x P/E range over 10 years; current trailing P/E is ~47x.
Chart 5EPS Growth — 10 Years
| Stock | 2017 | 2026 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coca-Cola FEMSA, S.… (KOF) | -61.2 | 113.5 | +285.5% |
| Walmart Inc. (WMT) | 1.46 | 2.73 | +87.0% |
Walmart Inc.'s EPS grew from $1.46 (2017) to $2.73 (2026) — a 7% CAGR.
Chart 6Free Cash Flow — 5 Years
Coca-Cola FEMSA, S.A.B. de C.V. generated $0M FCF in 2025 (-100% vs 2021). Walmart Inc. generated $42B FCF in 2026 (+61% vs 2021).
KOF vs WMT: Frequently Asked Questions
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is KOF or WMT a better buy right now?
Coca-Cola FEMSA, S.A.B. de C.V. (KOF) offers the better valuation at 16.9x trailing P/E (0.9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Coca-Cola FEMSA, S.A.B. de C.V. (KOF) a "Buy" — based on 11 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — KOF or WMT?
On trailing P/E, Coca-Cola FEMSA, S.A.B. de C.V. (KOF) is the cheapest at 16.9x versus Walmart Inc. at 46.9x. On forward P/E, Coca-Cola FEMSA, S.A.B. de C.V. is actually cheaper at 0.9x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Coca-Cola FEMSA, S.A.B. de C.V. wins at 0.05x versus Walmart Inc.'s 3.98x — a PEG below 1.0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — KOF or WMT?
Over the past 5 years, Walmart Inc. (WMT) delivered a total return of +201.3%, compared to +192.0% for Coca-Cola FEMSA, S.A.B. de C.V. (KOF). A $10,000 investment in WMT five years ago would be worth approximately $30K today (assuming dividends reinvested). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: WMT returned +512.5% versus KOF's +84.7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — KOF or WMT?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Coca-Cola FEMSA, S.A.B. de C.V. (KOF) is the lower-risk stock at 0.29β versus Walmart Inc.'s 0.53β — meaning WMT is approximately 84% more volatile than KOF relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Coca-Cola FEMSA, S.A.B. de C.V. (KOF) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 54% versus 67% for Walmart Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which has better profit margins — KOF or WMT?
Coca-Cola FEMSA, S.A.B. de C.V. (KOF) is the more profitable company, earning 8.2% net margin versus 3.1% for Walmart Inc. — meaning it keeps 8.2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: KOF leads at 14.7% versus 4.2% for WMT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — KOF leads at 45.6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is KOF or WMT more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential. By this metric, Coca-Cola FEMSA, S.A.B. de C.V. (KOF) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0.05x versus Walmart Inc.'s 3.98x. A PEG below 1.0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Coca-Cola FEMSA, S.A.B. de C.V. (KOF) trades at 0.9x forward P/E versus 43.8x for Walmart Inc. — 42.9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for WMT: 6.5% to $136.31.
07Which pays a better dividend — KOF or WMT?
In this comparison, WMT (0.7% yield) pays a dividend. KOF does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
08Is KOF or WMT better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Walmart Inc. (WMT) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.53), 0.7% yield, +512.5% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (WMT: +512.5%, KOF: +84.7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between KOF and WMT?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Defensive sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both. In terms of investment character: KOF is a mid-cap deep-value stock; WMT is a mega-cap quality compounder stock. WMT pays a dividend while KOF does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that beat both.