Grocery Stores
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
KR vs ACI vs WMT vs TGT
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Grocery Stores
Specialty Retail
Discount Stores
KR vs ACI vs WMT vs TGT — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Grocery Stores | Grocery Stores | Specialty Retail | Discount Stores |
| Market Cap | $41.77B | $8.24B | $1.04T | $59.32B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $147.64B | $81.72B | $703.06B | $106.25B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $1.02B | $870M | $22.91B | $4.04B |
| Gross Margin | 22.3% | 27.2% | 24.9% | 27.3% |
| Operating Margin | 1.3% | 1.8% | 4.1% | 5.3% |
| Forward P/E | 12.6x | 7.1x | 44.7x | 16.3x |
| Total Debt | $24.68B | $14.18B | $67.09B | $5.59B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $3.33B | $298M | $10.73B | $5.49B |
KR vs ACI vs WMT vs TGT — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| The Kroger Co. (KR) | 100 | 195.0 | +95.0% |
| Albertsons Companie… (ACI) | 100 | 101.6 | +1.6% |
| Walmart Inc. (WMT) | 100 | 325.8 | +225.8% |
| Target Corporation (TGT) | 100 | 108.6 | +8.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: KR vs ACI vs WMT vs TGT
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
KR lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
ACI is the clearest fit if your priority is valuation efficiency.
- PEG 0.46 vs WMT's 4.06
- Lower P/E (7.1x vs 16.3x)
WMT carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 4.7%, EPS growth 13.3%, 3Y rev CAGR 5.3%
- 5.0% 10Y total return vs KR's 115.3%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.12, Low D/E 67.2%, current ratio 0.79x
- 4.7% revenue growth vs TGT's -1.7%
TGT is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and defensive is your priority.
- Dividend streak 22 yrs, beta 0.95, yield 3.5%
- Beta 0.95, yield 3.5%, current ratio 0.94x
- 3.8% margin vs KR's 0.7%
- 3.5% yield, 22-year raise streak, vs WMT's 0.7%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 4.7% revenue growth vs TGT's -1.7% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (7.1x vs 16.3x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 3.8% margin vs KR's 0.7% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.12 vs TGT's 0.95 | |
| Dividends | 3.5% yield, 22-year raise streak, vs WMT's 0.7% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +43.9% vs ACI's -24.1% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 7.9% ROA vs KR's 2.0%, ROIC 14.7% vs 5.0% |
KR vs ACI vs WMT vs TGT — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
KR vs ACI vs WMT vs TGT — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
TGT leads in 2 of 6 categories
ACI leads 1 • WMT leads 1 • KR leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
TGT leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
WMT is the larger business by revenue, generating $703.1B annually — 8.6x ACI's $81.7B. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 3.8% (TGT) to 0.7% (KR). On growth, WMT holds the edge at +5.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $147.6B | $81.7B | $703.1B | $106.2B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $5.5B | $4.1B | $42.8B | $8.7B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $1.0B | $870M | $22.9B | $4.0B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $3.5B | $2.1B | $15.3B | $2.9B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +22.3% | +27.2% | +24.9% | +27.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +1.3% | +1.8% | +4.1% | +5.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +0.7% | +1.1% | +3.3% | +3.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +2.4% | +2.5% | +2.2% | +2.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +1.2% | +1.9% | +5.8% | +3.2% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +50.0% | -20.3% | +35.1% | +23.7% |
Valuation Metrics
ACI leads this category, winning 7 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 9.8x trailing earnings, ACI trades at a 79% valuation discount to WMT's 47.6x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), ACI offers better value at 0.63x vs WMT's 4.33x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $41.8B | $8.2B | $1.04T | $59.3B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $63.1B | $22.1B | $1.09T | $59.4B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 42.86x | 9.77x | 47.65x | 16.02x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 12.60x | 7.05x | 44.67x | 16.28x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 0.63x | 4.33x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 10.86x | 5.47x | 24.83x | 7.51x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.28x | 0.10x | 1.45x | 0.57x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 7.28x | 2.76x | 10.44x | 3.67x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 12.47x | 10.99x | 24.94x | 20.93x |
Profitability & Efficiency
TGT leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ACI delivers a 34.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $35 in annual profit, vs $13 for KR. TGT carries lower financial leverage with a 0.35x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to ACI's 4.19x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), WMT scores 6/9 vs ACI's 5/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +13.0% | +34.8% | +22.3% | +26.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +2.0% | +3.2% | +7.9% | +6.9% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +5.0% | +6.8% | +14.7% | +16.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +5.5% | +7.1% | +17.5% | +13.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 4.16x | 4.19x | 0.67x | 0.35x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $21.3B | $13.9B | $56.4B | $104M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $3.3B | $298M | $10.7B | $5.5B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $24.7B | $14.2B | $67.1B | $5.6B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 2.59x | 3.41x | 11.85x | 12.40x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
WMT leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in WMT five years ago would be worth $28,531 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $7,095 for TGT. Over the past 12 months, TGT leads with a +43.9% total return vs ACI's -24.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors WMT at 37.5% vs ACI's -5.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +5.4% | -5.5% | +15.6% | +30.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -7.7% | -24.1% | +33.0% | +43.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +41.9% | -14.6% | +160.2% | -8.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +89.9% | +32.0% | +185.3% | -29.1% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +115.3% | +66.7% | +505.0% | +108.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +12.4% | -5.1% | +37.5% | -2.8% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — KR and TGT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
KR is the less volatile stock with a -0.64 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than TGT's 0.95 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. TGT currently trades 97.9% from its 52-week high vs ACI's 70.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | -0.64x | -0.33x | 0.12x | 0.95x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $76.58 | $22.78 | $134.69 | $133.07 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $58.60 | $15.80 | $91.89 | $83.44 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +86.2% | +70.4% | +96.6% | +97.9% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 42.4 | 38.8 | 58.1 | 58.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 5.6M | 6.2M | 17.2M | 4.5M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — WMT and TGT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: KR as "Buy", ACI as "Buy", WMT as "Buy", TGT as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 22.5% upside for ACI (target: $20) vs -11.4% for TGT (target: $115). For income investors, TGT offers the higher dividend yield at 3.46% vs WMT's 0.72%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $74.75 | $19.63 | $137.04 | $115.31 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 44 | 23 | 64 | 59 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +2.0% | +3.2% | +0.7% | +3.5% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 21 | 1 | 37 | 22 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.35 | $0.51 | $0.94 | $4.51 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +6.5% | +1.0% | +0.8% | +0.7% |
TGT leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). ACI leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
KR vs ACI vs WMT vs TGT: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is KR or ACI or WMT or TGT a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Walmart Inc.
(WMT) is the stronger pick with 4. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -1. 7% for Target Corporation (TGT). Albertsons Companies, Inc. (ACI) offers the better valuation at 9. 8x trailing P/E (7. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate The Kroger Co. (KR) a "Buy" — based on 44 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — KR or ACI or WMT or TGT?
On trailing P/E, Albertsons Companies, Inc.
(ACI) is the cheapest at 9. 8x versus Walmart Inc. at 47. 6x. On forward P/E, Albertsons Companies, Inc. is actually cheaper at 7. 1x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Albertsons Companies, Inc. wins at 0. 46x versus Walmart Inc. 's 4. 06x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — KR or ACI or WMT or TGT?
Over the past 5 years, Walmart Inc.
(WMT) delivered a total return of +185. 3%, compared to -29. 1% for Target Corporation (TGT). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: WMT returned +505. 0% versus ACI's +66. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — KR or ACI or WMT or TGT?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), The Kroger Co.
(KR) is the lower-risk stock at -0. 64β versus Target Corporation's 0. 95β — meaning TGT is approximately -249% more volatile than KR relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Target Corporation (TGT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 35% versus 4% for Albertsons Companies, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — KR or ACI or WMT or TGT?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Walmart Inc.
(WMT) is pulling ahead at 4. 7% versus -1. 7% for Target Corporation (TGT). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Walmart Inc. grew EPS 13. 3% year-over-year, compared to -58. 0% for The Kroger Co.. Over a 3-year CAGR, WMT leads at 5. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — KR or ACI or WMT or TGT?
Target Corporation (TGT) is the more profitable company, earning 3.
5% net margin versus 0. 7% for The Kroger Co. — meaning it keeps 3. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: TGT leads at 4. 9% versus 1. 3% for KR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — TGT leads at 27. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is KR or ACI or WMT or TGT more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Albertsons Companies, Inc. (ACI) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 46x versus Walmart Inc. 's 4. 06x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Albertsons Companies, Inc. (ACI) trades at 7. 1x forward P/E versus 44. 7x for Walmart Inc. — 37. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for ACI: 22. 5% to $19. 63.
08Which pays a better dividend — KR or ACI or WMT or TGT?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Target Corporation (TGT) offers the highest yield at 3. 5%, versus 0. 7% for Walmart Inc. (WMT).
09Is KR or ACI or WMT or TGT better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, The Kroger Co.
(KR) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0. 64), 2. 0% yield, +115. 3% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (KR: +115. 3%, TGT: +108. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between KR and ACI and WMT and TGT?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Defensive sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: KR is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; ACI is a small-cap deep-value stock; WMT is a mega-cap quality compounder stock; TGT is a mid-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.