Internet Content & Information
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
KRKR vs NTES
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Electronic Gaming & Multimedia
KRKR vs NTES — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Internet Content & Information | Electronic Gaming & Multimedia |
| Market Cap | $6M | $74.15B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $340M | $112.25B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-91M | $33.67B |
| Gross Margin | 53.5% | 64.3% |
| Operating Margin | -27.7% | 31.8% |
| Forward P/E | 0.1x | 1.9x |
| Total Debt | $30M | $6.39B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $37M | $51.52B |
KRKR vs NTES — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| 36Kr Holdings Inc. (KRKR) | 100 | 3.2 | -96.8% |
| NetEase, Inc. (NTES) | 100 | 152.9 | +52.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: KRKR vs NTES
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
KRKR is the clearest fit if your priority is value.
- Lower P/E (0.1x vs 1.9x)
NTES carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 4 yrs, beta 0.74, yield 2.6%
- Rev growth 4.0%, EPS growth 11.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 4.3%
- 375.8% 10Y total return vs KRKR's -98.6%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 4.0% revenue growth vs KRKR's -32.1% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (0.1x vs 1.9x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 30.0% margin vs KRKR's -26.6% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.74 vs KRKR's 1.23, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 2.6% yield; 4-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +12.8% vs KRKR's -29.6% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 15.2% ROA vs KRKR's -18.8%, ROIC 23.3% vs -30.9% |
KRKR vs NTES — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
KRKR vs NTES — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NTES leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NTES is the larger business by revenue, generating $112.2B annually — 330.0x KRKR's $340M. NTES is the more profitable business, keeping 30.0% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to KRKR's -26.6%. On growth, KRKR holds the edge at +7.0% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $340M | $112.2B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$92M | $38.0B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$91M | $33.7B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $253,372 | $48.5B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +53.5% | +64.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -27.7% | +31.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -26.6% | +30.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +0.1% | +43.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +7.0% | +1.6% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +11.8% | -30.4% |
Valuation Metrics
KRKR leads this category, winning 4 of 4 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $6M | $74.2B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $5M | $67.5B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.31x | 15.63x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 0.10x | 1.86x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 0.67x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 12.40x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.18x | 4.61x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.36x | 3.10x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 10.44x |
Profitability & Efficiency
NTES leads this category, winning 7 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
NTES delivers a 20.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $20 in annual profit, vs $-32 for KRKR. NTES carries lower financial leverage with a 0.04x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to KRKR's 0.25x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), NTES scores 8/9 vs KRKR's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -31.6% | +20.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -18.8% | +15.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -30.9% | +23.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -37.1% | +22.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 8 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.25x | 0.04x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$7M | -$45.1B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $37M | $51.5B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $30M | $6.4B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
NTES leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in NTES five years ago would be worth $11,631 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $652 for KRKR. Over the past 12 months, NTES leads with a +12.8% total return vs KRKR's -29.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors NTES at 11.2% vs KRKR's -43.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -20.3% | -19.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -29.6% | +12.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -81.7% | +37.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -93.5% | +16.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -98.6% | +375.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -43.2% | +11.2% |
Risk & Volatility
NTES leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
NTES is the less volatile stock with a 0.74 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than KRKR's 1.23 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. NTES currently trades 73.4% from its 52-week high vs KRKR's 17.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.23x | 0.74x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $21.36 | $159.55 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $2.87 | $103.23 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +17.5% | +73.4% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 56.2 | 58.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 18K | 750K |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates KRKR as "Buy" and NTES as "Buy". NTES is the only dividend payer here at 2.62% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $149.75 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 1 | 32 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +2.6% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 4 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $20.90 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.1% |
NTES leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). KRKR leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics).
KRKR vs NTES: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is KRKR or NTES a better buy right now?
For growth investors, NetEase, Inc.
(NTES) is the stronger pick with 4. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -32. 1% for 36Kr Holdings Inc. (KRKR). NetEase, Inc. (NTES) offers the better valuation at 15. 6x trailing P/E (1. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate 36Kr Holdings Inc. (KRKR) a "Buy" — based on 1 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — KRKR or NTES?
On forward P/E, 36Kr Holdings Inc.
is actually cheaper at 0. 1x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — KRKR or NTES?
Over the past 5 years, NetEase, Inc.
(NTES) delivered a total return of +16. 3%, compared to -93. 5% for 36Kr Holdings Inc. (KRKR). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: NTES returned +375. 8% versus KRKR's -98. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — KRKR or NTES?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), NetEase, Inc.
(NTES) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 74β versus 36Kr Holdings Inc. 's 1. 23β — meaning KRKR is approximately 65% more volatile than NTES relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, NetEase, Inc. (NTES) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 4% versus 25% for 36Kr Holdings Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — KRKR or NTES?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), NetEase, Inc.
(NTES) is pulling ahead at 4. 0% versus -32. 1% for 36Kr Holdings Inc. (KRKR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: NetEase, Inc. grew EPS 11. 0% year-over-year, compared to -51. 4% for 36Kr Holdings Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, NTES leads at 4. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — KRKR or NTES?
NetEase, Inc.
(NTES) is the more profitable company, earning 30. 0% net margin versus -59. 1% for 36Kr Holdings Inc. — meaning it keeps 30. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: NTES leads at 31. 8% versus -33. 7% for KRKR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NTES leads at 64. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is KRKR or NTES more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, 36Kr Holdings Inc.
(KRKR) trades at 0. 1x forward P/E versus 1. 9x for NetEase, Inc. — 1. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis.
08Which pays a better dividend — KRKR or NTES?
In this comparison, NTES (2.
6% yield) pays a dividend. KRKR does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is KRKR or NTES better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, NetEase, Inc.
(NTES) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 74), 2. 6% yield, +375. 8% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (NTES: +375. 8%, KRKR: -98. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between KRKR and NTES?
These companies operate in different sectors (KRKR (Communication Services) and NTES (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: KRKR is a small-cap quality compounder stock; NTES is a mid-cap deep-value stock. NTES pays a dividend while KRKR does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
- Sector: Communication Services
- Market Cap > $100B
- Revenue Growth > 5%
- Gross Margin > 32%
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.
Compare NTES vs BIDU
BIDU is one of the most direct listed alternatives to NTES.
Compare KRKR vs BIDU
BIDU overlaps with KRKR in an adjacent operating segment worth comparing.
Expand With BIDU + IQ
BIDU and IQ are the strongest missing peers across the current compare set.