Medical - Instruments & Supplies
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
KRMD vs DBVT vs ALKS vs ATRC vs PRGO
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
Medical - Instruments & Supplies
Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic
KRMD vs DBVT vs ALKS vs ATRC vs PRGO — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Medical - Instruments & Supplies | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Medical - Instruments & Supplies | Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic |
| Market Cap | $207M | $1712.35T | $5.90B | $1.41B | $1.61B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $43M | $0.00 | $1.56B | $552M | $4.18B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-2M | $-168M | $153M | $-5M | $-1.82B |
| Gross Margin | 60.1% | — | 65.4% | 75.5% | 34.2% |
| Operating Margin | -5.1% | — | 12.3% | -0.4% | -4.1% |
| Forward P/E | — | — | 24.8x | 428.7x | 5.5x |
| Total Debt | $3M | $22M | $70M | $88M | $3.97B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $9M | $194M | $1.12B | $167M | $532M |
KRMD vs DBVT vs ALKS vs ATRC vs PRGO — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| KORU Medical System… (KRMD) | 100 | 41.5 | -58.5% |
| DBV Technologies S.… (DBVT) | 100 | 40.7 | -59.3% |
| Alkermes plc (ALKS) | 100 | 213.9 | +113.9% |
| AtriCure, Inc. (ATRC) | 100 | 55.0 | -45.0% |
| Perrigo Company plc (PRGO) | 100 | 21.4 | -78.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: KRMD vs DBVT vs ALKS vs ATRC vs PRGO
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
KRMD ranks third and is worth considering specifically for long-term compounding.
- 11.2% 10Y total return vs ALKS's -11.0%
- 22.2% revenue growth vs DBVT's -100.0%
DBVT is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +110.4% vs PRGO's -51.2%
ALKS has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in quality and efficiency.
- 9.8% margin vs PRGO's -43.5%
- 5.4% ROA vs DBVT's -89.0%
ATRC is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night.
- Rev growth 14.9%, EPS growth 74.7%, 3Y rev CAGR 17.4%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.03, Low D/E 17.9%, current ratio 3.96x
- Beta 1.03, current ratio 3.96x
- Beta 1.03 vs DBVT's 1.26
PRGO is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability is your priority.
- Dividend streak 10 yrs, beta 1.18, yield 9.8%
- Lower P/E (5.5x vs 428.7x)
- 9.8% yield; 10-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 22.2% revenue growth vs DBVT's -100.0% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (5.5x vs 428.7x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 9.8% margin vs PRGO's -43.5% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.03 vs DBVT's 1.26 | |
| Dividends | 9.8% yield; 10-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +110.4% vs PRGO's -51.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 5.4% ROA vs DBVT's -89.0% |
KRMD vs DBVT vs ALKS vs ATRC vs PRGO — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
KRMD vs DBVT vs ALKS vs ATRC vs PRGO — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
ALKS leads in 2 of 6 categories
PRGO leads 2 • DBVT leads 1 • KRMD leads 0 • ATRC leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ALKS leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
PRGO and DBVT operate at a comparable scale, with $4.2B and $0 in trailing revenue. ALKS is the more profitable business, keeping 9.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to PRGO's -43.5%. On growth, ALKS holds the edge at +28.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $43M | $0 | $1.6B | $552M | $4.2B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$1M | -$112M | $212M | $13M | $58M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$2M | -$168M | $153M | -$5M | -$1.8B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $179,290 | -$151M | $392M | $54M | $108M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +60.1% | — | +65.4% | +75.5% | +34.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -5.1% | — | +12.3% | -0.4% | -4.1% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -5.3% | — | +9.8% | -0.8% | -43.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +0.4% | — | +25.1% | +9.7% | +2.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +22.1% | — | +28.2% | +14.3% | -7.2% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +33.3% | +91.5% | -4.1% | +101.6% | -56.4% |
Valuation Metrics
PRGO leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, PRGO's 7.4x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than ATRC's 77.7x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $207M | $1712.35T | $5.9B | $1.4B | $1.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $201M | $1712.35T | $4.9B | $1.3B | $5.1B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -77.76x | -0.76x | 24.76x | -115.83x | -1.14x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | — | 428.71x | 5.53x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | 17.25x | 77.75x | 7.42x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 5.02x | — | 4.00x | 2.63x | 0.38x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 12.03x | 0.66x | 3.28x | 2.70x | 0.55x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | 12.28x | 29.15x | 11.12x |
Profitability & Efficiency
ALKS leads this category, winning 8 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ALKS delivers a 8.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $9 in annual profit, vs $-130 for DBVT. ALKS carries lower financial leverage with a 0.04x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to PRGO's 1.35x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ALKS scores 7/9 vs PRGO's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -13.6% | -130.2% | +8.8% | -1.0% | -50.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -8.3% | -89.0% | +5.4% | -0.7% | -19.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -19.5% | — | +18.9% | -0.6% | +3.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -14.9% | -145.7% | +14.2% | -0.6% | +4.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 4 | 7 | 5 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.21x | 0.13x | 0.04x | 0.18x | 1.35x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$5M | -$172M | -$1.0B | -$79M | $3.4B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $9M | $194M | $1.1B | $167M | $532M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $3M | $22M | $70M | $88M | $4.0B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | -189.82x | 32.30x | 0.47x | -7.20x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
DBVT leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in ALKS five years ago would be worth $16,091 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,090 for DBVT. Over the past 12 months, DBVT leads with a +110.4% total return vs PRGO's -51.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors DBVT at 6.2% vs PRGO's -25.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -20.9% | +4.9% | +25.3% | -29.2% | -13.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +63.2% | +110.4% | +16.5% | -8.3% | -51.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +13.3% | +19.7% | +14.5% | -41.8% | -58.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +24.0% | -69.1% | +60.9% | -64.2% | -60.1% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +1116.4% | -87.0% | -11.0% | +95.1% | -77.7% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +4.2% | +6.2% | +4.6% | -16.5% | -25.2% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — ALKS and ATRC each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
ATRC is the less volatile stock with a 1.03 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than DBVT's 1.26 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. ALKS currently trades 96.7% from its 52-week high vs PRGO's 41.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.98x | 1.26x | 1.00x | 0.95x | 1.21x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $6.61 | $26.18 | $36.60 | $43.18 | $28.44 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $2.63 | $7.53 | $25.17 | $26.62 | $9.23 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +67.2% | +76.3% | +96.7% | +64.4% | +41.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 42.9 | 48.1 | 60.2 | 45.0 | 60.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 138K | 252K | 2.3M | 669K | 3.4M |
Analyst Outlook
PRGO leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: KRMD as "Buy", DBVT as "Buy", ALKS as "Buy", ATRC as "Buy", PRGO as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 208.9% upside for PRGO (target: $36) vs 29.9% for ALKS (target: $46). PRGO is the only dividend payer here at 9.81% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $7.00 | $46.33 | $46.00 | $51.33 | $36.20 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 5 | 15 | 28 | 19 | 36 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — | +9.8% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | 10 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — | $1.15 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | +0.5% | +0.8% | 0.0% |
ALKS leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). PRGO leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Analyst Outlook). 1 tied.
KRMD vs DBVT vs ALKS vs ATRC vs PRGO: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is KRMD or DBVT or ALKS or ATRC or PRGO a better buy right now?
For growth investors, KORU Medical Systems, Inc.
(KRMD) is the stronger pick with 22. 2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -5. 2% for Alkermes plc (ALKS). Alkermes plc (ALKS) offers the better valuation at 24. 8x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate KORU Medical Systems, Inc. (KRMD) a "Buy" — based on 5 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — KRMD or DBVT or ALKS or ATRC or PRGO?
On forward P/E, Perrigo Company plc is actually cheaper at 5.
5x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — KRMD or DBVT or ALKS or ATRC or PRGO?
Over the past 5 years, Alkermes plc (ALKS) delivered a total return of +60.
9%, compared to -69. 1% for DBV Technologies S. A. (DBVT). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: KRMD returned +1051% versus DBVT's -87. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — KRMD or DBVT or ALKS or ATRC or PRGO?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), AtriCure, Inc.
(ATRC) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 95β versus DBV Technologies S. A. 's 1. 26β — meaning DBVT is approximately 33% more volatile than ATRC relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Alkermes plc (ALKS) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 4% versus 135% for Perrigo Company plc — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — KRMD or DBVT or ALKS or ATRC or PRGO?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), KORU Medical Systems, Inc.
(KRMD) is pulling ahead at 22. 2% versus -5. 2% for Alkermes plc (ALKS). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: AtriCure, Inc. grew EPS 74. 7% year-over-year, compared to -723. 2% for Perrigo Company plc. Over a 3-year CAGR, ATRC leads at 17. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — KRMD or DBVT or ALKS or ATRC or PRGO?
Alkermes plc (ALKS) is the more profitable company, earning 16.
4% net margin versus -33. 5% for Perrigo Company plc — meaning it keeps 16. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ALKS leads at 17. 2% versus -7. 2% for KRMD. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ALKS leads at 86. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is KRMD or DBVT or ALKS or ATRC or PRGO more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Perrigo Company plc (PRGO) trades at 5.
5x forward P/E versus 428. 7x for AtriCure, Inc. — 423. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for PRGO: 208. 9% to $36. 20.
08Which pays a better dividend — KRMD or DBVT or ALKS or ATRC or PRGO?
In this comparison, PRGO (9.
8% yield) pays a dividend. KRMD, DBVT, ALKS, ATRC do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is KRMD or DBVT or ALKS or ATRC or PRGO better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, KORU Medical Systems, Inc.
(KRMD) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 98), +1051% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (KRMD: +1051%, DBVT: -87. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between KRMD and DBVT and ALKS and ATRC and PRGO?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: KRMD is a small-cap high-growth stock; DBVT is a mega-cap quality compounder stock; ALKS is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ATRC is a small-cap quality compounder stock; PRGO is a small-cap income-oriented stock. PRGO pays a dividend while KRMD, DBVT, ALKS, ATRC do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.