Medical - Instruments & Supplies
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
KRMD vs INFU
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Medical - Instruments & Supplies
KRMD vs INFU — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Medical - Instruments & Supplies | Medical - Instruments & Supplies |
| Market Cap | $207M | $181M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $43M | $142M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-2M | $8M |
| Gross Margin | 60.1% | 56.7% |
| Operating Margin | -5.1% | 9.1% |
| Forward P/E | — | 21.5x |
| Total Debt | $3M | $3M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $9M | $3M |
KRMD vs INFU — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| KORU Medical System… (KRMD) | 100 | 43.9 | -56.1% |
| InfuSystem Holdings… (INFU) | 100 | 77.2 | -22.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: KRMD vs INFU
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
KRMD is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 1.15
- Rev growth 22.2%, EPS growth 56.1%, 3Y rev CAGR 13.8%
- 11.2% 10Y total return vs INFU's 159.0%
INFU carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for quality and momentum.
- 5.6% margin vs KRMD's -5.3%
- +88.6% vs KRMD's +63.2%
- 7.9% ROA vs KRMD's -8.3%, ROIC 12.5% vs -19.5%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 22.2% revenue growth vs INFU's 6.4% | |
| Quality / Margins | 5.6% margin vs KRMD's -5.3% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.15 vs INFU's 1.50 | |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +88.6% vs KRMD's +63.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 7.9% ROA vs KRMD's -8.3%, ROIC 12.5% vs -19.5% |
KRMD vs INFU — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
KRMD vs INFU — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
INFU leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
INFU is the larger business by revenue, generating $142M annually — 3.3x KRMD's $43M. INFU is the more profitable business, keeping 5.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to KRMD's -5.3%. On growth, KRMD holds the edge at +22.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $43M | $142M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$1M | $23M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$2M | $8M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $179,290 | $22M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +60.1% | +56.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -5.1% | +9.1% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -5.3% | +5.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +0.4% | +15.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +22.1% | -3.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +33.3% | +6.0% |
Valuation Metrics
INFU leads this category, winning 2 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $207M | $181M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $201M | $181M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -77.76x | 28.90x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 21.54x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 7.19x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 5.02x | 1.26x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 12.03x | 3.30x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 7.59x |
Profitability & Efficiency
INFU leads this category, winning 7 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
INFU delivers a 14.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $14 in annual profit, vs $-14 for KRMD. INFU carries lower financial leverage with a 0.06x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to KRMD's 0.21x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), INFU scores 8/9 vs KRMD's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -13.6% | +14.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -8.3% | +7.9% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -19.5% | +12.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -14.9% | +14.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 8 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.21x | 0.06x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$5M | $241,000 |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $9M | $3M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $3M | $3M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | 13.65x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
KRMD leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in KRMD five years ago would be worth $12,402 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $4,297 for INFU. Over the past 12 months, INFU leads with a +88.6% total return vs KRMD's +63.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors KRMD at 4.2% vs INFU's 0.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -20.9% | +6.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +63.2% | +88.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +13.3% | +2.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +24.0% | -57.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +1116.4% | +159.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +4.2% | +0.9% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — KRMD and INFU each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
KRMD is the less volatile stock with a 1.15 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than INFU's 1.50 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. INFU currently trades 81.2% from its 52-week high vs KRMD's 67.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.15x | 1.50x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $6.61 | $11.04 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $2.63 | $4.70 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +67.2% | +81.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 42.9 | 51.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 138K | 121K |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates KRMD as "Buy" and INFU as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 67.4% upside for INFU (target: $15) vs 57.7% for KRMD (target: $7).
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $7.00 | $15.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 5 | 3 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +6.1% |
INFU leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). KRMD leads in 1 (Total Returns). 1 tied.
KRMD vs INFU: Frequently Asked Questions
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is KRMD or INFU a better buy right now?
For growth investors, KORU Medical Systems, Inc.
(KRMD) is the stronger pick with 22. 2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 6. 4% for InfuSystem Holdings, Inc. (INFU). InfuSystem Holdings, Inc. (INFU) offers the better valuation at 28. 9x trailing P/E (21. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate KORU Medical Systems, Inc. (KRMD) a "Buy" — based on 5 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — KRMD or INFU?
Over the past 5 years, KORU Medical Systems, Inc.
(KRMD) delivered a total return of +24. 0%, compared to -57. 0% for InfuSystem Holdings, Inc. (INFU). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: KRMD returned +1116% versus INFU's +159. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — KRMD or INFU?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), KORU Medical Systems, Inc.
(KRMD) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 15β versus InfuSystem Holdings, Inc. 's 1. 50β — meaning INFU is approximately 30% more volatile than KRMD relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, InfuSystem Holdings, Inc. (INFU) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 6% versus 21% for KORU Medical Systems, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — KRMD or INFU?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), KORU Medical Systems, Inc.
(KRMD) is pulling ahead at 22. 2% versus 6. 4% for InfuSystem Holdings, Inc. (INFU). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: InfuSystem Holdings, Inc. grew EPS 181. 8% year-over-year, compared to 56. 1% for KORU Medical Systems, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, KRMD leads at 13. 8% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — KRMD or INFU?
InfuSystem Holdings, Inc.
(INFU) is the more profitable company, earning 4. 6% net margin versus -6. 4% for KORU Medical Systems, Inc. — meaning it keeps 4. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: INFU leads at 8. 3% versus -7. 2% for KRMD. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — KRMD leads at 60. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is KRMD or INFU more undervalued right now?
Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for INFU: 67.
4% to $15. 00.
07Which pays a better dividend — KRMD or INFU?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
08Is KRMD or INFU better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, KORU Medical Systems, Inc.
(KRMD) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 15), +1116% 10Y return). InfuSystem Holdings, Inc. (INFU) carries a higher beta of 1. 50 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (KRMD: +1116%, INFU: +159. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between KRMD and INFU?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: KRMD is a small-cap high-growth stock; INFU is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.