Industrial - Machinery
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
KRNT vs SPIR vs ASTS vs SSYS
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Specialty Business Services
Communication Equipment
Computer Hardware
KRNT vs SPIR vs ASTS vs SSYS — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Industrial - Machinery | Specialty Business Services | Communication Equipment | Computer Hardware |
| Market Cap | $749M | $529.86B | $19.12B | $707M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $208M | $72M | $71M | $551M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-14M | $-25.02B | $-342M | $-104M |
| Gross Margin | 44.3% | 40.8% | 53.4% | 43.6% |
| Operating Margin | -16.3% | -121.4% | -405.7% | -11.7% |
| Forward P/E | 64.1x | 10.0x | — | 69.8x |
| Total Debt | $19M | $8.76B | $32M | $27M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $35M | $24.81B | $2.34B | $95M |
KRNT vs SPIR vs ASTS vs SSYS — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Nov 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Kornit Digital Ltd. (KRNT) | 100 | 19.3 | -80.7% |
| Spire Global, Inc. (SPIR) | 100 | 20.5 | -79.5% |
| AST SpaceMobile, In… (ASTS) | 100 | 645.4 | +545.4% |
| Stratasys Ltd. (SSYS) | 100 | 48.0 | -52.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: KRNT vs SPIR vs ASTS vs SSYS
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
KRNT carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- beta 1.49
- Lower volatility, beta 1.49, Low D/E 2.6%, current ratio 14.18x
- Beta 1.49, current ratio 14.18x
- -6.5% margin vs SPIR's -349.6%
SPIR is the clearest fit if your priority is value.
- Lower P/E (10.0x vs 69.8x)
ASTS is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and long-term compounding is your priority.
- Rev growth 15.1%, EPS growth 30.9%, 3Y rev CAGR 72.5%
- 5.7% 10Y total return vs SSYS's -60.6%
- 15.1% revenue growth vs SPIR's -35.2%
- +158.1% vs SSYS's -15.6%
SSYS lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 15.1% revenue growth vs SPIR's -35.2% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (10.0x vs 69.8x) | |
| Quality / Margins | -6.5% margin vs SPIR's -349.6% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.49 vs SPIR's 2.93, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 4 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +158.1% vs SSYS's -15.6% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | -1.8% ROA vs SPIR's -47.3%, ROIC -3.7% vs -0.1% |
KRNT vs SPIR vs ASTS vs SSYS — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
KRNT vs SPIR vs ASTS vs SSYS — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
ASTS leads in 1 of 6 categories
KRNT leads 1 • SPIR leads 0 • SSYS leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — KRNT and ASTS and SSYS each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SSYS is the larger business by revenue, generating $551M annually — 7.8x ASTS's $71M. KRNT is the more profitable business, keeping -6.5% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SPIR's -349.6%. On growth, ASTS holds the edge at +27.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $208M | $72M | $71M | $551M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$22M | -$74M | -$237M | -$32M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$14M | -$25.0B | -$342M | -$104M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $3M | -$16.2B | -$1.1B | -$8M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +44.3% | +40.8% | +53.4% | +43.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -16.3% | -121.4% | -4.1% | -11.7% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -6.5% | -349.6% | -4.8% | -18.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +1.5% | -227.0% | -16.0% | -1.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -3.0% | -26.9% | +27.3% | -6.9% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -34.8% | +59.5% | -55.6% | +62.7% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — KRNT and SSYS each lead in 2 of 4 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $749M | $529.9B | $19.1B | $707M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $732M | $513.8B | $16.8B | $639M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -54.30x | 10.01x | -48.76x | -6.41x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 64.13x | — | — | 69.79x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 3.60x | 7405.21x | 269.64x | 1.28x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.03x | 4.56x | 5.68x | 0.79x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 235.87x | — | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — KRNT and SPIR each lead in 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
KRNT delivers a -1.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-2 in annual profit, vs $-88 for SPIR. ASTS carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to SPIR's 0.08x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), KRNT scores 6/9 vs ASTS's 5/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -1.9% | -88.4% | -21.1% | -12.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -1.8% | -47.3% | -12.6% | -9.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -3.7% | -0.1% | -47.1% | -5.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -4.7% | -0.1% | -10.0% | -6.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.03x | 0.08x | 0.01x | 0.03x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$17M | -$16.1B | -$2.3B | -$68M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $35M | $24.8B | $2.3B | $95M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $19M | $8.8B | $32M | $27M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | 9.20x | -21.20x | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
ASTS leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in ASTS five years ago would be worth $78,824 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,782 for KRNT. Over the past 12 months, ASTS leads with a +158.1% total return vs SSYS's -15.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors ASTS at 134.8% vs SSYS's -17.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +13.6% | +106.4% | -21.7% | -9.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -13.6% | +73.1% | +158.1% | -15.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -10.9% | +198.1% | +1194.0% | -42.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -82.2% | -79.6% | +688.2% | -59.1% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +79.2% | -78.8% | +568.8% | -60.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -3.8% | +43.9% | +134.8% | -17.0% |
Risk & Volatility
KRNT leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
KRNT is the less volatile stock with a 1.49 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SPIR's 2.93 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. KRNT currently trades 69.4% from its 52-week high vs ASTS's 50.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.49x | 2.93x | 2.82x | 1.79x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $23.48 | $23.59 | $129.89 | $12.81 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $11.93 | $6.60 | $22.47 | $7.34 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +69.4% | +68.3% | +50.3% | +64.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 62.1 | 55.5 | 41.8 | 64.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 271K | 1.6M | 14.9M | 818K |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: KRNT as "Buy", SPIR as "Buy", ASTS as "Buy", SSYS as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 64.6% upside for SSYS (target: $14) vs 7.0% for SPIR (target: $17).
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $21.00 | $17.25 | $103.65 | $13.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 13 | 12 | 7 | 36 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +3.7% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
ASTS leads in 1 of 6 categories (Total Returns). KRNT leads in 1 (Risk & Volatility). 3 tied.
KRNT vs SPIR vs ASTS vs SSYS: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is KRNT or SPIR or ASTS or SSYS a better buy right now?
For growth investors, AST SpaceMobile, Inc.
(ASTS) is the stronger pick with 1505% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -35. 2% for Spire Global, Inc. (SPIR). Spire Global, Inc. (SPIR) offers the better valuation at 10. 0x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Kornit Digital Ltd. (KRNT) a "Buy" — based on 13 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — KRNT or SPIR or ASTS or SSYS?
On forward P/E, Kornit Digital Ltd.
is actually cheaper at 64. 1x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — KRNT or SPIR or ASTS or SSYS?
Over the past 5 years, AST SpaceMobile, Inc.
(ASTS) delivered a total return of +688. 2%, compared to -82. 2% for Kornit Digital Ltd. (KRNT). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ASTS returned +568. 8% versus SPIR's -78. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — KRNT or SPIR or ASTS or SSYS?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Kornit Digital Ltd.
(KRNT) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 49β versus Spire Global, Inc. 's 2. 93β — meaning SPIR is approximately 96% more volatile than KRNT relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, AST SpaceMobile, Inc. (ASTS) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 8% for Spire Global, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — KRNT or SPIR or ASTS or SSYS?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), AST SpaceMobile, Inc.
(ASTS) is pulling ahead at 1505% versus -35. 2% for Spire Global, Inc. (SPIR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Spire Global, Inc. grew EPS 137. 8% year-over-year, compared to 14. 3% for Kornit Digital Ltd.. Over a 3-year CAGR, ASTS leads at 72. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — KRNT or SPIR or ASTS or SSYS?
Spire Global, Inc.
(SPIR) is the more profitable company, earning 71. 7% net margin versus -482. 2% for AST SpaceMobile, Inc. — meaning it keeps 71. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: SSYS leads at -10. 7% versus -405. 7% for ASTS. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ASTS leads at 53. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is KRNT or SPIR or ASTS or SSYS more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Kornit Digital Ltd.
(KRNT) trades at 64. 1x forward P/E versus 69. 8x for Stratasys Ltd. — 5. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for SSYS: 64. 6% to $13. 50.
08Which pays a better dividend — KRNT or SPIR or ASTS or SSYS?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is KRNT or SPIR or ASTS or SSYS better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Kornit Digital Ltd.
(KRNT) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding. Spire Global, Inc. (SPIR) carries a higher beta of 2. 93 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (KRNT: +79. 2%, SPIR: -78. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between KRNT and SPIR and ASTS and SSYS?
These companies operate in different sectors (KRNT (Industrials) and SPIR (Industrials) and ASTS (Technology) and SSYS (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: KRNT is a small-cap quality compounder stock; SPIR is a large-cap deep-value stock; ASTS is a mid-cap high-growth stock; SSYS is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.