Telecommunications Services
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
KT vs SKM vs VIV vs CHA vs T
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Telecommunications Services
Telecommunications Services
Beverages - Non-Alcoholic
Telecommunications Services
KT vs SKM vs VIV vs CHA vs T — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Telecommunications Services | Telecommunications Services | Telecommunications Services | Beverages - Non-Alcoholic | Telecommunications Services |
| Market Cap | $10.11B | $13.93B | $24.57B | $1.32B | $176.40B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $28.21T | $17.10T | $59.83B | $13.27B | $126.52B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $1.73T | $407.83B | $6.20B | $1.80B | $21.41B |
| Gross Margin | 67.1% | 88.0% | 43.6% | 47.2% | 79.7% |
| Operating Margin | 8.7% | 11.9% | 15.8% | 15.3% | 19.4% |
| Forward P/E | 0.0x | 0.0x | 2.8x | 1.2x | 10.9x |
| Total Debt | $12.21T | $10.77T | $20.75B | $548M | $173.99B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $3.51T | $1.49T | $6.69B | $4.75B | $18.23B |
KT vs SKM vs VIV vs CHA vs T — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Apr 25 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| KT Corporation (KT) | 100 | 107.7 | +7.7% |
| SK Telecom Co.,Ltd (SKM) | 100 | 168.1 | +68.1% |
| Telefônica Brasil S… (VIV) | 100 | 158.4 | +58.4% |
| Chagee Holdings Lim… (CHA) | 100 | 32.8 | -67.2% |
| AT&T Inc. (T) | 100 | 91.2 | -8.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: KT vs SKM vs VIV vs CHA vs T
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
KT is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.42, yield 3.8%
- Rev growth 8.3%, EPS growth 277.9%, 3Y rev CAGR 3.7%
- PEG 0.00 vs VIV's 1.03
- Beta 0.42, yield 3.8%, current ratio 1.20x
SKM has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.
- 239.9% 10Y total return vs VIV's 81.5%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.34, Low D/E 85.8%, current ratio 1.03x
- Beta 0.34 vs CHA's 0.79
- +77.0% vs CHA's -63.0%
Among these 5 stocks, VIV doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
CHA is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth and efficiency is your priority.
- 167.4% revenue growth vs SKM's -3.4%
- 15.1% ROA vs SKM's 1.4%
T ranks third and is worth considering specifically for quality and dividends.
- 16.9% margin vs SKM's 2.4%
- 4.5% yield, 2-year raise streak, vs KT's 3.8%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 167.4% revenue growth vs SKM's -3.4% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (0.0x vs 10.9x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 16.9% margin vs SKM's 2.4% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.34 vs CHA's 0.79 | |
| Dividends | 4.5% yield, 2-year raise streak, vs KT's 3.8%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +77.0% vs CHA's -63.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 15.1% ROA vs SKM's 1.4% |
KT vs SKM vs VIV vs CHA vs T — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
KT vs SKM vs VIV vs CHA vs T — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
CHA leads in 1 of 6 categories
T leads 1 • KT leads 0 • SKM leads 0 • VIV leads 0 • 4 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — VIV and T each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
KT is the larger business by revenue, generating $28.21T annually — 2126.2x CHA's $13.3B. T is the more profitable business, keeping 16.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SKM's 2.4%. On growth, VIV holds the edge at +8.7% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $28.21T | $17.10T | $59.8B | $13.3B | $126.5B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $6.39T | $5.58T | $24.5B | $2.0B | $45.1B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $1.73T | $407.8B | $6.2B | $1.8B | $21.4B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $984.0B | $1.33T | $11.3B | $2.0B | $10.6B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +67.1% | +88.0% | +43.6% | +47.2% | +79.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +8.7% | +11.9% | +15.8% | +15.3% | +19.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +6.1% | +2.4% | +10.4% | +13.6% | +16.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +3.5% | +7.8% | +18.9% | +14.7% | +8.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +3.6% | -4.1% | +8.7% | -9.4% | +2.9% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +127.8% | -60.7% | +11.1% | -41.8% | -11.5% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — KT and CHA each lead in 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 5.5x trailing earnings, CHA trades at a 89% valuation discount to SKM's 51.5x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), SKM offers better value at 0.00x vs VIV's 8.38x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $10.1B | $13.9B | $24.6B | $1.3B | $176.4B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $16.1B | $20.3B | $27.4B | $706M | $332.2B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 8.45x | 51.50x | 22.53x | 5.46x | 8.31x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 0.01x | 0.01x | 2.78x | 1.20x | 10.93x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.39x | 0.00x | 8.38x | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 3.64x | 6.41x | 5.93x | 1.63x | 7.37x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.51x | 1.17x | 2.18x | 0.73x | 1.40x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.79x | 1.61x | 1.79x | 4.98x | 1.41x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 10.76x | 11.75x | 11.53x | 3.47x | 9.07x |
Profitability & Efficiency
CHA leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
CHA delivers a 20.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $21 in annual profit, vs $3 for SKM. CHA carries lower financial leverage with a 0.20x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to T's 1.35x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CHA scores 8/9 vs SKM's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +9.1% | +3.4% | +9.0% | +20.8% | +16.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +4.1% | +1.4% | +4.8% | +15.1% | +5.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +6.9% | +3.8% | +7.8% | — | +6.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +8.4% | +4.8% | +8.6% | +99.8% | +6.8% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 5 | 7 | 8 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.63x | 0.86x | 0.30x | 0.20x | 1.35x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $8.70T | $9.28T | $14.1B | -$4.2B | $155.8B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $3.51T | $1.49T | $6.7B | $4.8B | $18.2B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $12.21T | $10.77T | $20.7B | $548M | $174.0B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 6.61x | 2.80x | 15.03x | — | 4.97x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — SKM and VIV each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in VIV five years ago would be worth $20,880 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,656 for CHA. Over the past 12 months, SKM leads with a +77.0% total return vs CHA's -63.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors VIV at 26.6% vs CHA's -28.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +11.0% | +76.6% | +27.9% | -10.7% | +5.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +10.6% | +77.0% | +60.1% | -63.0% | -6.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +99.5% | +92.2% | +103.0% | -63.4% | +67.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +88.7% | +96.5% | +108.8% | -63.4% | +29.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +97.1% | +239.9% | +81.5% | -63.4% | +41.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +25.9% | +24.3% | +26.6% | -28.5% | +18.6% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — SKM and T each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
T is the less volatile stock with a -0.26 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CHA's 0.79 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. SKM currently trades 89.7% from its 52-week high vs CHA's 31.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.42x | 0.34x | 0.53x | 0.79x | -0.26x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $24.58 | $40.46 | $17.25 | $35.42 | $29.79 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $17.54 | $19.66 | $9.41 | $8.98 | $22.95 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +85.3% | +89.7% | +89.1% | +31.0% | +84.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 41.2 | 57.1 | 49.3 | 55.8 | 38.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.4M | 1.7M | 989K | 488K | 33.7M |
Analyst Outlook
T leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: KT as "Buy", SKM as "Hold", VIV as "Hold", CHA as "Buy", T as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 27.4% upside for CHA (target: $14) vs 7.3% for VIV (target: $17). For income investors, T offers the higher dividend yield at 4.51% vs VIV's 2.03%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold | Hold | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | — | $16.50 | $14.00 | $29.42 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 5 | 7 | 12 | 15 | 62 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +3.8% | +3.2% | +2.0% | — | +4.5% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | 2 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1161.87 | $1661.27 | $1.54 | — | $1.14 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +1.7% | 0.0% | +2.3% | +2.3% | +2.6% |
CHA leads in 1 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency). T leads in 1 (Analyst Outlook). 4 tied.
KT vs SKM vs VIV vs CHA vs T: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is KT or SKM or VIV or CHA or T a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Chagee Holdings Limited American Depositary Shares (CHA) is the stronger pick with 167.
4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -3. 4% for SK Telecom Co. ,Ltd (SKM). Chagee Holdings Limited American Depositary Shares (CHA) offers the better valuation at 5. 5x trailing P/E (1. 2x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate KT Corporation (KT) a "Buy" — based on 5 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — KT or SKM or VIV or CHA or T?
On trailing P/E, Chagee Holdings Limited American Depositary Shares (CHA) is the cheapest at 5.
5x versus SK Telecom Co. ,Ltd at 51. 5x. On forward P/E, KT Corporation is actually cheaper at 0. 0x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: KT Corporation wins at 0. 00x versus Telefônica Brasil S. A. 's 1. 03x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — KT or SKM or VIV or CHA or T?
Over the past 5 years, Telefônica Brasil S.
A. (VIV) delivered a total return of +108. 8%, compared to -63. 4% for Chagee Holdings Limited American Depositary Shares (CHA). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: SKM returned +239. 9% versus CHA's -63. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — KT or SKM or VIV or CHA or T?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), AT&T Inc.
(T) is the lower-risk stock at -0. 26β versus Chagee Holdings Limited American Depositary Shares's 0. 79β — meaning CHA is approximately -403% more volatile than T relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Chagee Holdings Limited American Depositary Shares (CHA) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 20% versus 135% for AT&T Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — KT or SKM or VIV or CHA or T?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Chagee Holdings Limited American Depositary Shares (CHA) is pulling ahead at 167.
4% versus -3. 4% for SK Telecom Co. ,Ltd (SKM). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: KT Corporation grew EPS 277. 9% year-over-year, compared to -68. 0% for SK Telecom Co. ,Ltd. Over a 3-year CAGR, VIV leads at 8. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — KT or SKM or VIV or CHA or T?
Chagee Holdings Limited American Depositary Shares (CHA) is the more profitable company, earning 20.
3% net margin versus 2. 4% for SK Telecom Co. ,Ltd — meaning it keeps 20. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CHA leads at 23. 3% versus 6. 3% for SKM. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — T leads at 79. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is KT or SKM or VIV or CHA or T more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, KT Corporation (KT) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 00x versus Telefônica Brasil S. A. 's 1. 03x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, KT Corporation (KT) trades at 0. 0x forward P/E versus 10. 9x for AT&T Inc. — 10. 9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for CHA: 27. 4% to $14. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — KT or SKM or VIV or CHA or T?
In this comparison, T (4.
5% yield), KT (3. 8% yield), SKM (3. 2% yield), VIV (2. 0% yield) pay a dividend. CHA does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is KT or SKM or VIV or CHA or T better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, AT&T Inc.
(T) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0. 26), 4. 5% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (T: +41. 9%, CHA: -63. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between KT and SKM and VIV and CHA and T?
These companies operate in different sectors (KT (Communication Services) and SKM (Communication Services) and VIV (Communication Services) and CHA (Consumer Defensive) and T (Communication Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: KT is a mid-cap deep-value stock; SKM is a mid-cap income-oriented stock; VIV is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; CHA is a small-cap high-growth stock; T is a mid-cap deep-value stock. KT, SKM, VIV, T pay a dividend while CHA does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
- Sector: Communication Services
- Market Cap > $100B
- Gross Margin > 52%
- Dividend Yield > 1.2%
- Sector: Communication Services
- Market Cap > $100B
- Net Margin > 10%
- Dividend Yield > 1.8%
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.