Apparel - Manufacturers
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
KTB vs GES vs PVH vs HBI
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Apparel - Retail
Apparel - Manufacturers
Apparel - Manufacturers
KTB vs GES vs PVH vs HBI — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Apparel - Manufacturers | Apparel - Retail | Apparel - Manufacturers | Apparel - Manufacturers |
| Market Cap | $4.34B | $877M | $4.06B | $2.29B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $3.15B | $3.14B | $8.78B | $3.44B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $227M | $80M | $469M | $330M |
| Gross Margin | 46.6% | 42.4% | 58.2% | 42.0% |
| Operating Margin | 11.4% | 3.7% | 7.4% | 13.1% |
| Forward P/E | 14.2x | 10.4x | 8.1x | 9.8x |
| Total Debt | $1.29B | $1.42B | $3.39B | $2.55B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $108M | $188M | $748M | $215M |
KTB vs GES vs PVH vs HBI — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Kontoor Brands, Inc. (KTB) | 100 | 534.0 | +434.0% |
| Guess', Inc. (GES) | 100 | 175.0 | +75.0% |
| PVH Corp. (PVH) | 100 | 194.9 | +94.9% |
| Hanesbrands Inc. (HBI) | 100 | 65.6 | -34.4% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: KTB vs GES vs PVH vs HBI
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
KTB carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 21.0%, EPS growth -7.1%, 3Y rev CAGR 6.2%
- 122.8% 10Y total return vs GES's 56.6%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.24, current ratio 1.82x
- PEG 0.50 vs PVH's 0.60
GES is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and defensive is your priority.
- Dividend streak 4 yrs, beta 0.82, yield 5.6%
- Beta 0.82, yield 5.6%, current ratio 1.50x
- Beta 0.82 vs HBI's 1.72, lower leverage
- +57.5% vs KTB's +18.9%
PVH is the clearest fit if your priority is value.
- Lower P/E (8.1x vs 9.8x)
HBI is the clearest fit if your priority is quality.
- 9.6% margin vs GES's 2.6%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 21.0% revenue growth vs PVH's -6.1% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (8.1x vs 9.8x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 9.6% margin vs GES's 2.6% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.82 vs HBI's 1.72, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 2.7% yield, 5-year raise streak, vs GES's 5.6%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +57.5% vs KTB's +18.9% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 9.2% ROA vs GES's 2.7%, ROIC 25.7% vs 7.8% |
KTB vs GES vs PVH vs HBI — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
KTB vs GES vs PVH vs HBI — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
KTB leads in 2 of 6 categories
HBI leads 1 • PVH leads 1 • GES leads 1 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
HBI leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
PVH is the larger business by revenue, generating $8.8B annually — 2.8x GES's $3.1B. HBI is the more profitable business, keeping 9.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to GES's 2.6%. On growth, KTB holds the edge at +45.7% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $3.2B | $3.1B | $8.8B | $3.4B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $408M | $150M | $924M | $496M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $227M | $80M | $469M | $330M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $433M | $123M | $516M | -$8M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +46.6% | +42.4% | +58.2% | +42.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +11.4% | +3.7% | +7.4% | +13.1% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +7.2% | +2.6% | +5.3% | +9.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +13.7% | +3.9% | +5.9% | -0.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +45.7% | +7.2% | +4.5% | -4.8% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +14.9% | +2.0% | +65.0% | +8.0% |
Valuation Metrics
PVH leads this category, winning 5 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 8.4x trailing earnings, PVH trades at a 62% valuation discount to GES's 21.8x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), PVH offers better value at 0.62x vs KTB's 0.68x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $4.3B | $877M | $4.1B | $2.3B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $5.5B | $2.1B | $6.7B | $4.6B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 19.28x | 21.83x | 8.39x | -7.11x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 14.20x | 10.38x | 8.12x | 9.82x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.68x | — | 0.62x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 11.19x | 8.72x | 6.61x | 16.64x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.38x | 0.29x | 0.47x | 0.65x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 7.75x | 2.09x | 0.98x | 66.99x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 7.66x | 24.63x | 6.97x | 10.11x |
Profitability & Efficiency
KTB leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
HBI delivers a 73.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $74 in annual profit, vs $10 for PVH. PVH carries lower financial leverage with a 0.66x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to HBI's 75.02x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), PVH scores 7/9 vs HBI's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +45.1% | +14.2% | +9.6% | +73.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +9.2% | +2.7% | +4.0% | +7.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +25.7% | +7.8% | +7.0% | +4.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +27.5% | +9.3% | +8.8% | +5.4% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 5 | 7 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 2.29x | 2.58x | 0.66x | 75.02x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $1.2B | $1.2B | $2.6B | $2.3B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $108M | $188M | $748M | $215M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1.3B | $1.4B | $3.4B | $2.6B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 6.19x | 3.90x | 2.42x | 2.15x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
KTB leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in KTB five years ago would be worth $13,601 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,362 for HBI. Over the past 12 months, GES leads with a +57.5% total return vs KTB's +18.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors KTB at 27.6% vs PVH's 2.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +27.8% | +0.1% | +30.7% | — |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +18.9% | +57.5% | +24.6% | +32.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +107.5% | +22.1% | +7.7% | +49.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +36.0% | -19.5% | -24.8% | -66.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +122.8% | +56.6% | -1.9% | -62.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +27.6% | +6.9% | +2.5% | +14.2% |
Risk & Volatility
GES leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
GES is the less volatile stock with a 0.82 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than HBI's 1.72 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. GES currently trades 98.0% from its 52-week high vs PVH's 88.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.24x | 0.82x | 1.48x | 1.72x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $87.00 | $17.15 | $100.15 | $7.05 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $53.55 | $10.29 | $59.60 | $3.96 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +89.7% | +98.0% | +88.5% | +91.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 55.6 | 54.4 | 60.3 | 44.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 775K | 9.1M | 1.1M | 104.2M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — KTB and GES each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: KTB as "Buy", GES as "Hold", PVH as "Buy", HBI as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 55.8% upside for GES (target: $26) vs 2.9% for KTB (target: $80). For income investors, GES offers the higher dividend yield at 5.57% vs PVH's 0.17%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $80.33 | $26.19 | $100.00 | $7.25 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 17 | 32 | 38 | 34 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +2.7% | +5.6% | +0.2% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 5 | 4 | 0 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $2.07 | $0.94 | $0.15 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.6% | +6.9% | +12.9% | 0.0% |
KTB leads in 2 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). HBI leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow). 1 tied.
KTB vs GES vs PVH vs HBI: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is KTB or GES or PVH or HBI a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Kontoor Brands, Inc.
(KTB) is the stronger pick with 21. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -6. 1% for PVH Corp. (PVH). PVH Corp. (PVH) offers the better valuation at 8. 4x trailing P/E (8. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Kontoor Brands, Inc. (KTB) a "Buy" — based on 17 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — KTB or GES or PVH or HBI?
On trailing P/E, PVH Corp.
(PVH) is the cheapest at 8. 4x versus Guess', Inc. at 21. 8x. On forward P/E, PVH Corp. is actually cheaper at 8. 1x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Kontoor Brands, Inc. wins at 0. 50x versus PVH Corp. 's 0. 60x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — KTB or GES or PVH or HBI?
Over the past 5 years, Kontoor Brands, Inc.
(KTB) delivered a total return of +36. 0%, compared to -66. 4% for Hanesbrands Inc. (HBI). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: KTB returned +122. 8% versus HBI's -62. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — KTB or GES or PVH or HBI?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Guess', Inc.
(GES) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 82β versus Hanesbrands Inc. 's 1. 72β — meaning HBI is approximately 108% more volatile than GES relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, PVH Corp. (PVH) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 66% versus 75% for Hanesbrands Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — KTB or GES or PVH or HBI?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Kontoor Brands, Inc.
(KTB) is pulling ahead at 21. 0% versus -6. 1% for PVH Corp. (PVH). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: PVH Corp. grew EPS -1. 9% year-over-year, compared to -1698. 4% for Hanesbrands Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, KTB leads at 6. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — KTB or GES or PVH or HBI?
Kontoor Brands, Inc.
(KTB) is the more profitable company, earning 7. 2% net margin versus -9. 1% for Hanesbrands Inc. — meaning it keeps 7. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: KTB leads at 14. 1% versus 5. 3% for HBI. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — PVH leads at 59. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is KTB or GES or PVH or HBI more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Kontoor Brands, Inc. (KTB) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 50x versus PVH Corp. 's 0. 60x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, PVH Corp. (PVH) trades at 8. 1x forward P/E versus 14. 2x for Kontoor Brands, Inc. — 6. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for GES: 55. 8% to $26. 19.
08Which pays a better dividend — KTB or GES or PVH or HBI?
In this comparison, GES (5.
6% yield), KTB (2. 7% yield), PVH (0. 2% yield) pay a dividend. HBI does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is KTB or GES or PVH or HBI better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Guess', Inc.
(GES) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 82), 5. 6% yield). Hanesbrands Inc. (HBI) carries a higher beta of 1. 72 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (GES: +56. 6%, HBI: -62. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between KTB and GES and PVH and HBI?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: KTB is a small-cap high-growth stock; GES is a small-cap income-oriented stock; PVH is a small-cap deep-value stock; HBI is a small-cap quality compounder stock. KTB, GES pay a dividend while PVH, HBI do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.