Aerospace & Defense
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
KTOS vs AVAV vs RCAT vs JOBY
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Aerospace & Defense
Computer Hardware
Airlines, Airports & Air Services
KTOS vs AVAV vs RCAT vs JOBY — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Aerospace & Defense | Aerospace & Defense | Computer Hardware | Airlines, Airports & Air Services |
| Market Cap | $10.68B | $8.40B | $1.02B | $9.83B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.42B | $1.61B | $26M | $78M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $29M | $-224M | $-59M | $-957M |
| Gross Margin | 18.3% | 21.8% | 7.9% | 11.2% |
| Operating Margin | 1.8% | -8.3% | -234.6% | -10.2% |
| Forward P/E | 73.5x | 58.4x | — | — |
| Total Debt | $180M | $64M | $18M | $61M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $561M | $41M | $168M | $241M |
KTOS vs AVAV vs RCAT vs JOBY — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Nov 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Kratos Defense & Se… (KTOS) | 100 | 269.2 | +169.2% |
| AeroVironment, Inc. (AVAV) | 100 | 197.0 | +97.0% |
| Red Cat Holdings, I… (RCAT) | 100 | 1046.5 | +946.5% |
| Joby Aviation, Inc. (JOBY) | 100 | 88.8 | -11.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: KTOS vs AVAV vs RCAT vs JOBY
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
KTOS has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in long-term compounding.
- 12.3% 10Y total return vs AVAV's 498.3%
- 2.1% margin vs JOBY's -12.3%
- 1.0% ROA vs JOBY's -52.1%, ROIC 1.4% vs -54.7%
AVAV is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- beta 1.57
- Lower volatility, beta 1.57, Low D/E 7.3%, current ratio 3.52x
- Better valuation composite
- Beta 1.57 vs RCAT's 3.31, lower leverage
RCAT is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 459.8%, EPS growth 29.4%, 3Y rev CAGR 106.6%
- +92.6% vs AVAV's +5.1%
JOBY is the clearest fit if your priority is defensive.
- Beta 2.70, current ratio 24.09x
- 391.8% revenue growth vs AVAV's 14.5%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 391.8% revenue growth vs AVAV's 14.5% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 2.1% margin vs JOBY's -12.3% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.57 vs RCAT's 3.31, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 4 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +92.6% vs AVAV's +5.1% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 1.0% ROA vs JOBY's -52.1%, ROIC 1.4% vs -54.7% |
KTOS vs AVAV vs RCAT vs JOBY — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
KTOS vs AVAV vs RCAT vs JOBY — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
KTOS leads in 2 of 6 categories
RCAT leads 1 • AVAV leads 0 • JOBY leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
KTOS leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
AVAV is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.6B annually — 62.6x RCAT's $26M. KTOS is the more profitable business, keeping 2.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to JOBY's -12.3%. On growth, AVAV holds the edge at +143.4% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.4B | $1.6B | $26M | $78M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $72M | $82M | -$58M | -$759M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $29M | -$224M | -$59M | -$957M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$133M | -$183M | -$75M | -$661M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +18.3% | +21.8% | +7.9% | +11.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +1.8% | -8.3% | -2.3% | -10.2% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +2.1% | -13.9% | -2.3% | -12.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -9.4% | -11.3% | -2.9% | -8.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +22.6% | +143.4% | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +133.3% | -51.5% | — | -9.1% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — KTOS and AVAV each lead in 2 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 108.5x trailing earnings, AVAV trades at a 75% valuation discount to KTOS's 438.5x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, AVAV's 103.0x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than KTOS's 118.4x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $10.7B | $8.4B | $1.0B | $9.8B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $10.3B | $8.4B | $875M | $9.6B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 438.46x | 108.50x | -17.27x | -8.85x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 73.49x | 58.41x | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 118.42x | 102.96x | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 7.93x | 10.23x | 25.15x | 183.94x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 4.94x | 5.34x | 5.03x | 5.86x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
KTOS leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
KTOS delivers a 1.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $1 in annual profit, vs $-74 for JOBY. JOBY carries lower financial leverage with a 0.04x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to KTOS's 0.09x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), KTOS scores 4/9 vs JOBY's 3/9, reflecting mixed financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +1.3% | -6.4% | -33.6% | -74.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.0% | -5.0% | -28.8% | -52.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +1.4% | +3.6% | -71.0% | -54.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +1.5% | +4.5% | -42.9% | -49.8% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 3 | 4 | 3 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.09x | 0.07x | 0.07x | 0.04x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$381M | $23M | -$149M | -$180M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $561M | $41M | $168M | $241M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $180M | $64M | $18M | $61M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 6.16x | -5.99x | — | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
RCAT leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in RCAT five years ago would be worth $26,979 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $10,096 for JOBY. Over the past 12 months, RCAT leads with a +92.6% total return vs AVAV's +5.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors RCAT at 125.5% vs AVAV's 17.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -28.1% | -34.4% | +13.1% | -30.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +58.1% | +5.1% | +92.6% | +55.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +331.5% | +63.1% | +1047.3% | +128.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +110.3% | +53.7% | +169.8% | +1.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +1231.8% | +498.3% | -97.8% | -4.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +62.8% | +17.7% | +125.5% | +31.8% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — AVAV and RCAT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
AVAV is the less volatile stock with a 1.57 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than RCAT's 3.31 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. RCAT currently trades 55.2% from its 52-week high vs AVAV's 40.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.84x | 1.57x | 3.31x | 2.70x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $134.00 | $417.86 | $18.78 | $20.95 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $32.85 | $155.69 | $5.23 | $6.32 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +42.5% | +40.2% | +55.2% | +47.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 38.8 | 39.8 | 39.4 | 65.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 4.3M | 1.7M | 15.8M | 24.7M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: KTOS as "Buy", AVAV as "Buy", RCAT as "Buy", JOBY as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 104.3% upside for AVAV (target: $344) vs 59.1% for JOBY (target: $16).
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $110.58 | $343.60 | $17.00 | $15.90 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 22 | 28 | 2 | 8 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
KTOS leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). RCAT leads in 1 (Total Returns). 2 tied.
KTOS vs AVAV vs RCAT vs JOBY: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is KTOS or AVAV or RCAT or JOBY a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Joby Aviation, Inc.
(JOBY) is the stronger pick with 391. 8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 14. 5% for AeroVironment, Inc. (AVAV). AeroVironment, Inc. (AVAV) offers the better valuation at 108. 5x trailing P/E (58. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Kratos Defense & Security Solutions, Inc. (KTOS) a "Buy" — based on 22 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — KTOS or AVAV or RCAT or JOBY?
On trailing P/E, AeroVironment, Inc.
(AVAV) is the cheapest at 108. 5x versus Kratos Defense & Security Solutions, Inc. at 438. 5x. On forward P/E, AeroVironment, Inc. is actually cheaper at 58. 4x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — KTOS or AVAV or RCAT or JOBY?
Over the past 5 years, Red Cat Holdings, Inc.
(RCAT) delivered a total return of +169. 8%, compared to +1. 0% for Joby Aviation, Inc. (JOBY). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: KTOS returned +1232% versus RCAT's -97. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — KTOS or AVAV or RCAT or JOBY?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), AeroVironment, Inc.
(AVAV) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 57β versus Red Cat Holdings, Inc. 's 3. 31β — meaning RCAT is approximately 111% more volatile than AVAV relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Joby Aviation, Inc. (JOBY) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 4% versus 9% for Kratos Defense & Security Solutions, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — KTOS or AVAV or RCAT or JOBY?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Joby Aviation, Inc.
(JOBY) is pulling ahead at 391. 8% versus 14. 5% for AeroVironment, Inc. (AVAV). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Red Cat Holdings, Inc. grew EPS 29. 4% year-over-year, compared to -29. 9% for Joby Aviation, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, RCAT leads at 106. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — KTOS or AVAV or RCAT or JOBY?
AeroVironment, Inc.
(AVAV) is the more profitable company, earning 5. 3% net margin versus -1740. 5% for Joby Aviation, Inc. — meaning it keeps 5. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: AVAV leads at 5. 0% versus -1346. 9% for JOBY. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — AVAV leads at 39. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is KTOS or AVAV or RCAT or JOBY more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, AeroVironment, Inc.
(AVAV) trades at 58. 4x forward P/E versus 73. 5x for Kratos Defense & Security Solutions, Inc. — 15. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for AVAV: 104. 3% to $343. 60.
08Which pays a better dividend — KTOS or AVAV or RCAT or JOBY?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is KTOS or AVAV or RCAT or JOBY better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Kratos Defense & Security Solutions, Inc.
(KTOS) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (+1232% 10Y return). Red Cat Holdings, Inc. (RCAT) carries a higher beta of 3. 31 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (KTOS: +1232%, RCAT: -97. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between KTOS and AVAV and RCAT and JOBY?
These companies operate in different sectors (KTOS (Industrials) and AVAV (Industrials) and RCAT (Technology) and JOBY (Industrials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: KTOS is a mid-cap high-growth stock; AVAV is a small-cap quality compounder stock; RCAT is a small-cap high-growth stock; JOBY is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.