KULR
KULR Technology Group, Inc.
Hardware, Equipment & Parts
Market Cap$509M
5Y Perf.-65.9%
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Try these comparisons:
Stock Comparison
KULR vs AEHR
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
AEHR
Aehr Test Systems
Semiconductors
Market Cap$2.79B
5Y Perf.+5430.9%
KULR vs AEHR — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | KULR | AEHR |
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Hardware, Equipment & Parts | Semiconductors |
| Market Cap | $509M | $2.79B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $17M | $49M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-22M | $-11M |
| Gross Margin | 22.1% | 30.2% |
| Operating Margin | -186.9% | -27.8% |
| Total Debt | $2M | $11M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $30M | $25M |
KULR vs AEHR — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
KULR
AEHR
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| KULR Technology Gro… (KULR) | 100 | 34.1 | -65.9% |
| Aehr Test Systems (AEHR) | 100 | 5530.9 | +5430.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: KULR vs AEHR
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: AEHR leads in 3 of 6 categories, making it the strongest pick for profitability and margin quality and recent price momentum and sentiment. KULR Technology Group, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion and capital preservation and lower volatility. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
KULR
KULR Technology Group, Inc.
The Income Pick
KULR is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and growth exposure.
- beta 3.28
- Rev growth 9.2%, EPS growth 53.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 64.5%
- Lower volatility, beta 3.28, Low D/E 3.2%, current ratio 7.32x
Best for: income & stability and growth exposure
AEHR
Aehr Test Systems
The Long-Run Compounder
AEHR carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding.
- 70.3% 10Y total return vs KULR's -77.3%
- -22.7% margin vs KULR's -133.5%
- +9.9% vs KULR's -73.1%
Best for: long-term compounding
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | KULR | 9.2% revenue growth vs AEHR's -20.2% |
| Quality / Margins | AEHR | -22.7% margin vs KULR's -133.5% |
| Stability / Safety | KULR | Beta 3.28 vs AEHR's 4.77, lower leverage |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | AEHR | +9.9% vs KULR's -73.1% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | AEHR | -7.5% ROA vs KULR's -14.3%, ROIC -3.0% vs -86.5% |
KULR vs AEHR — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
FY 2022
FY 2024
KULR vs AEHR — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLAEHRLAGGINGKULR
KULRKULR Technology Group…
0leads
AEHRAehr Test Systems
3leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs KULRMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
AEHR5/6
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
AEHR2/3
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
Tied
—
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
AEHR6/6
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
Tied
—
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
—
—
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
AEHR leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
AEHR is the larger business by revenue, generating $49M annually — 2.9x KULR's $17M. AEHR is the more profitable business, keeping -22.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to KULR's -133.5%. On growth, KULR holds the edge at +116.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | KULRKULR Technology G… | AEHRAehr Test Systems |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $17M | $49M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$28M | -$10M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$22M | -$11M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$37M | -$14M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +22.1% | +30.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -186.9% | -27.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -133.5% | -22.7% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -2.2% | -28.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +116.1% | -26.5% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -15.5% | -2.2% |
AEHR leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
AEHR leads this category, winning 2 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | KULRKULR Technology G… | AEHRAehr Test Systems |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $509M | $2.8B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $481M | $2.8B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -29.07x | -702.00x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 47.44x | 47.39x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 8.87x | 21.97x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — |
AEHR leads this category, winning 2 of 3 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — KULR and AEHR each lead in 4 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
AEHR delivers a -8.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-8 in annual profit, vs $-15 for KULR. KULR carries lower financial leverage with a 0.03x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to AEHR's 0.09x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), KULR scores 5/9 vs AEHR's 1/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | KULRKULR Technology G… | AEHRAehr Test Systems |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -15.0% | -8.5% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -14.3% | -7.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -86.5% | -3.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -49.0% | -3.2% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 1 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.03x | 0.09x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$28M | -$14M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $30M | $25M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $2M | $11M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -52.40x | — |
Evenly matched — KULR and AEHR each lead in 4 of 8 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
AEHR leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in AEHR five years ago would be worth $398,515 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,633 for KULR. Over the past 12 months, AEHR leads with a +991.6% total return vs KULR's -73.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors AEHR at 50.7% vs KULR's -20.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | KULRKULR Technology G… | AEHRAehr Test Systems |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -14.7% | +311.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -73.1% | +991.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -49.4% | +242.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -83.7% | +3885.1% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -77.3% | +7029.7% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -20.3% | +50.7% |
AEHR leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — KULR and AEHR each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
KULR is the less volatile stock with a 3.28 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than AEHR's 4.77 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. AEHR currently trades 89.1% from its 52-week high vs KULR's 19.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | KULRKULR Technology G… | AEHRAehr Test Systems |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 3.28x | 4.77x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $14.24 | $102.48 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.94 | $8.06 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +19.2% | +89.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 61.7 | 67.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.2M | 3.0M |
Evenly matched — KULR and AEHR each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates KULR as "Buy" and AEHR as "Hold".
| Metric | KULRKULR Technology G… | AEHRAehr Test Systems |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $62.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 2 | 3 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.1% | +0.0% |
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Key Takeaway
AEHR leads in 3 of 6 categories — strongest in Income & Cash Flow and Valuation Metrics. 2 categories are tied.
Best OverallAehr Test Systems (AEHR)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
KULR vs AEHR: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is KULR or AEHR a better buy right now?
Analysts rate KULR Technology Group, Inc.
(KULR) a "Buy" — based on 2 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — KULR or AEHR?
Over the past 5 years, Aehr Test Systems (AEHR) delivered a total return of +38.
9%, compared to -83. 7% for KULR Technology Group, Inc. (KULR). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: AEHR returned +70. 3% versus KULR's -77. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — KULR or AEHR?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), KULR Technology Group, Inc.
(KULR) is the lower-risk stock at 3. 28β versus Aehr Test Systems's 4. 77β — meaning AEHR is approximately 45% more volatile than KULR relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, KULR Technology Group, Inc. (KULR) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 3% versus 9% for Aehr Test Systems — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — KULR or AEHR?
On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: KULR Technology Group, Inc.
grew EPS 53. 0% year-over-year, compared to 0. 0% for Aehr Test Systems. Over a 3-year CAGR, KULR leads at 64. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — KULR or AEHR?
Aehr Test Systems (AEHR) is the more profitable company, earning -6.
6% net margin versus -163. 2% for KULR Technology Group, Inc. — meaning it keeps -6. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: AEHR leads at -7. 3% versus -141. 9% for KULR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — KULR leads at 51. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — KULR or AEHR?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
07Is KULR or AEHR better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Aehr Test Systems (AEHR) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding.
KULR Technology Group, Inc. (KULR) carries a higher beta of 3. 28 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (AEHR: +70. 3%, KULR: -77. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between KULR and AEHR?
Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
Revenue Growth>
%
(KULR: 116.1% · AEHR: -26.5%)You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.