Compare Stocks

5 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

KULR vs AMSC vs VICR vs ENVX vs BLNK

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
KULR
KULR Technology Group, Inc.

Hardware, Equipment & Parts

TechnologyAMEX • US
Market Cap$539M
5Y Perf.-72.8%
AMSC
American Superconductor Corporation

Industrial - Machinery

IndustrialsNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$2.65B
5Y Perf.+123.3%
VICR
Vicor Corporation

Hardware, Equipment & Parts

TechnologyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$11.57B
5Y Perf.+196.4%
ENVX
Enovix Corporation

Electrical Equipment & Parts

IndustrialsNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$1.37B
5Y Perf.-51.3%
BLNK
Blink Charging Co.

Engineering & Construction

IndustrialsNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$97M
5Y Perf.-98.3%

KULR vs AMSC vs VICR vs ENVX vs BLNK — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
KULR logoKULR
AMSC logoAMSC
VICR logoVICR
ENVX logoENVX
BLNK logoBLNK
IndustryHardware, Equipment & PartsIndustrial - MachineryHardware, Equipment & PartsElectrical Equipment & PartsEngineering & Construction
Market Cap$539M$2.65B$11.57B$1.37B$97M
Revenue (TTM)$17M$279M$453M$32M$106M
Net Income (TTM)$-22M$130M$119M$-157M$-126M
Gross Margin22.1%30.6%57.3%15.4%26.0%
Operating Margin-186.9%4.9%18.1%-5.6%-119.5%
Forward P/E15.9x92.5x
Total Debt$2M$3M$13M$21M$11M
Cash & Equiv.$30M$79M$403M$106M$42M

KULR vs AMSC vs VICR vs ENVX vs BLNKLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

KULR
AMSC
VICR
ENVX
BLNK
StockJan 21May 26Return
KULR Technology Gro… (KULR)10027.2-72.8%
American Supercondu… (AMSC)100223.3+123.3%
Vicor Corporation (VICR)100296.4+196.4%
Enovix Corporation (ENVX)10048.7-51.3%
Blink Charging Co. (BLNK)1001.7-98.3%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: KULR vs AMSC vs VICR vs ENVX vs BLNK

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: AMSC leads in 4 of 7 categories (5-stock set), making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and valuation and capital efficiency. Vicor Corporation is the stronger pick specifically for capital preservation and lower volatility and recent price momentum and sentiment. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
KULR
KULR Technology Group, Inc.
The Technology Pick

KULR plays a supporting role in this comparison — it may shine differently against other peers.

Best for: technology exposure
AMSC
American Superconductor Corporation
The Growth Play

AMSC carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure.

  • Rev growth 53.0%, EPS growth 143.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 27.1%
  • 53.0% revenue growth vs BLNK's -11.2%
  • Better valuation composite
  • 46.7% margin vs ENVX's -492.6%
Best for: growth exposure
VICR
Vicor Corporation
The Income Pick

VICR is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and long-term compounding is your priority.

  • Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 2.87
  • 26.5% 10Y total return vs AMSC's 396.8%
  • Lower volatility, beta 2.87, Low D/E 1.8%, current ratio 8.99x
  • Beta 2.87, current ratio 8.99x
Best for: income & stability and long-term compounding
ENVX
Enovix Corporation
The Growth Angle

ENVX lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.

Best for: industrials exposure
BLNK
Blink Charging Co.
The Industrials Pick

Among these 5 stocks, BLNK doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.

Best for: industrials exposure
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthAMSC logoAMSC53.0% revenue growth vs BLNK's -11.2%
ValueAMSC logoAMSCBetter valuation composite
Quality / MarginsAMSC logoAMSC46.7% margin vs ENVX's -492.6%
Stability / SafetyVICR logoVICRBeta 2.87 vs ENVX's 3.35, lower leverage
DividendsTieNone of these 5 stocks pay a meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)VICR logoVICR+5.2% vs KULR's -73.0%
Efficiency (ROA)AMSC logoAMSC18.1% ROA vs BLNK's -66.7%, ROIC -0.9% vs -109.7%

KULR vs AMSC vs VICR vs ENVX vs BLNK — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

KULRKULR Technology Group, Inc.
FY 2022
Product
66.2%$3M
Service
33.8%$1M
AMSCAmerican Superconductor Corporation
FY 2024
Grid
82.7%$170M
Wind
17.3%$36M
VICRVicor Corporation
FY 2025
AdvancedProducts
61.0%$249M
BrickProducts
39.0%$159M
ENVXEnovix Corporation
FY 2025
Product
100.0%$32M
BLNKBlink Charging Co.
FY 2024
Product
57.7%$82M
Service
15.1%$21M
Host Provider Fees
9.1%$13M
Network
6.2%$9M
Warranty
4.5%$6M
Depreciation and Amortization
4.4%$6M
Warranty And Repairs And Maintenance
1.8%$3M
Other (1)
1.1%$2M

KULR vs AMSC vs VICR vs ENVX vs BLNK — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLVICRLAGGINGBLNK

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

VICR leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

VICR is the larger business by revenue, generating $453M annually — 27.1x KULR's $17M. AMSC is the more profitable business, keeping 46.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to ENVX's -4.9%. On growth, KULR holds the edge at +116.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricKULR logoKULRKULR Technology G…AMSC logoAMSCAmerican Supercon…VICR logoVICRVicor CorporationENVX logoENVXEnovix CorporationBLNK logoBLNKBlink Charging Co.
RevenueTrailing 12 months$17M$279M$453M$32M$106M
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax-$28M$18M$103M-$142M-$115M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$22M$130M$119M-$157M-$126M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$37M$16M$119M-$114M-$47M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+22.1%+30.6%+57.3%+15.4%+26.0%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue-186.9%+4.9%+18.1%-5.6%-119.5%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue-133.5%+46.7%+26.2%-4.9%-118.7%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue-2.2%+5.7%+26.3%-3.6%-44.5%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+116.1%+21.4%+11.5%+15.9%+11.7%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-15.5%+39.9%+3.4%+20.0%+99.9%
VICR leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

Evenly matched — VICR and BLNK each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

At 98.3x trailing earnings, VICR trades at a 72% valuation discount to AMSC's 344.9x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, VICR's 194.0x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than AMSC's 471.5x.

MetricKULR logoKULRKULR Technology G…AMSC logoAMSCAmerican Supercon…VICR logoVICRVicor CorporationENVX logoENVXEnovix CorporationBLNK logoBLNKBlink Charging Co.
Market CapShares × price$539M$2.6B$11.6B$1.4B$97M
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$511M$2.6B$11.2B$1.3B$66M
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-30.78x344.94x98.26x-8.81x-0.43x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.15.94x92.55x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate2.19x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple471.48x194.00x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue50.22x11.89x28.37x43.13x0.78x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share9.39x10.56x16.19x5.01x0.72x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF102.43x97.02x
Evenly matched — VICR and BLNK each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

Evenly matched — AMSC and VICR each lead in 4 of 9 comparable metrics.

AMSC delivers a 24.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $24 in annual profit, vs $-132 for BLNK. AMSC carries lower financial leverage with a 0.02x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to BLNK's 0.09x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), AMSC scores 7/9 vs BLNK's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricKULR logoKULRKULR Technology G…AMSC logoAMSCAmerican Supercon…VICR logoVICRVicor CorporationENVX logoENVXEnovix CorporationBLNK logoBLNKBlink Charging Co.
ROE (TTM)Return on equity-15.0%+24.3%+18.7%-0.1%-131.9%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-14.3%+18.1%+16.6%-0.0%-66.7%
ROICReturn on invested capital-86.5%-0.9%+8.9%-74.2%-109.7%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-49.0%-0.6%+5.7%-27.5%-77.3%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–957753
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.03x0.02x0.02x0.08x0.09x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash-$28M-$76M-$390M-$85M-$31M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$30M$79M$403M$106M$42M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$2M$3M$13M$21M$11M
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense-52.40x-7.03x-9064.60x
Evenly matched — AMSC and VICR each lead in 4 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

Evenly matched — AMSC and VICR each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in AMSC five years ago would be worth $39,648 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $281 for BLNK. Over the past 12 months, VICR leads with a +524.2% total return vs KULR's -73.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors AMSC at 141.9% vs BLNK's -50.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricKULR logoKULRKULR Technology G…AMSC logoAMSCAmerican Supercon…VICR logoVICRVicor CorporationENVX logoENVXEnovix CorporationBLNK logoBLNKBlink Charging Co.
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-9.7%+74.8%+119.5%-16.2%+14.2%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months-73.0%+158.0%+524.2%+2.0%+1.0%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-46.4%+1315.1%+496.6%-50.4%-88.1%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-81.9%+296.5%+218.0%-47.1%-97.2%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-75.9%+396.8%+2651.8%-47.3%-97.3%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-18.8%+141.9%+81.4%-20.8%-50.9%
Evenly matched — AMSC and VICR each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

VICR leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

VICR is the less volatile stock with a 2.87 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than ENVX's 3.35 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. VICR currently trades 87.2% from its 52-week high vs KULR's 20.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricKULR logoKULRKULR Technology G…AMSC logoAMSCAmerican Supercon…VICR logoVICRVicor CorporationENVX logoENVXEnovix CorporationBLNK logoBLNKBlink Charging Co.
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5003.24x2.98x2.87x3.35x3.11x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$14.24$70.49$293.95$16.49$2.65
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$1.94$20.70$40.54$4.62$0.45
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+20.3%+78.3%+87.2%+40.1%+31.9%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10056.264.759.952.158.0
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded1.2M1.1M860K5.6M2.2M
VICR leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.

Analyst consensus: KULR as "Buy", AMSC as "Buy", VICR as "Buy", ENVX as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 66.4% upside for ENVX (target: $11) vs -5.8% for AMSC (target: $52).

MetricKULR logoKULRKULR Technology G…AMSC logoAMSCAmerican Supercon…VICR logoVICRVicor CorporationENVX logoENVXEnovix CorporationBLNK logoBLNKBlink Charging Co.
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuyBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$52.00$245.00$11.00
# AnalystsCovering analysts215716
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises0
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap+0.1%+0.0%+0.3%+4.3%0.0%
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Key Takeaway

VICR leads in 2 of 6 categories — strongest in Income & Cash Flow and Risk & Volatility. 3 categories are tied.

Best OverallVicor Corporation (VICR)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

KULR vs AMSC vs VICR vs ENVX vs BLNK: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is KULR or AMSC or VICR or ENVX or BLNK a better buy right now?

For growth investors, American Superconductor Corporation (AMSC) is the stronger pick with 53.

0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -11. 2% for Blink Charging Co. (BLNK). Vicor Corporation (VICR) offers the better valuation at 98. 3x trailing P/E (92. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate KULR Technology Group, Inc. (KULR) a "Buy" — based on 2 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — KULR or AMSC or VICR or ENVX or BLNK?

On trailing P/E, Vicor Corporation (VICR) is the cheapest at 98.

3x versus American Superconductor Corporation at 344. 9x. On forward P/E, American Superconductor Corporation is actually cheaper at 15. 9x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — KULR or AMSC or VICR or ENVX or BLNK?

Over the past 5 years, American Superconductor Corporation (AMSC) delivered a total return of +296.

5%, compared to -97. 2% for Blink Charging Co. (BLNK). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: VICR returned +26. 5% versus BLNK's -97. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — KULR or AMSC or VICR or ENVX or BLNK?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Vicor Corporation (VICR) is the lower-risk stock at 2.

87β versus Enovix Corporation's 3. 35β — meaning ENVX is approximately 17% more volatile than VICR relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, American Superconductor Corporation (AMSC) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 2% versus 9% for Blink Charging Co. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — KULR or AMSC or VICR or ENVX or BLNK?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), American Superconductor Corporation (AMSC) is pulling ahead at 53.

0% versus -11. 2% for Blink Charging Co. (BLNK). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Vicor Corporation grew EPS 1764% year-over-year, compared to 38. 9% for Blink Charging Co.. Over a 3-year CAGR, BLNK leads at 82. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — KULR or AMSC or VICR or ENVX or BLNK?

Vicor Corporation (VICR) is the more profitable company, earning 29.

1% net margin versus -492. 6% for Enovix Corporation — meaning it keeps 29. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: VICR leads at 9. 0% versus -557. 0% for ENVX. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — VICR leads at 52. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is KULR or AMSC or VICR or ENVX or BLNK more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, American Superconductor Corporation (AMSC) trades at 15.

9x forward P/E versus 92. 5x for Vicor Corporation — 76. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for ENVX: 66. 4% to $11. 00.

08

Which pays a better dividend — KULR or AMSC or VICR or ENVX or BLNK?

None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.

All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.

09

Is KULR or AMSC or VICR or ENVX or BLNK better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, American Superconductor Corporation (AMSC) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (+396.

8% 10Y return). Blink Charging Co. (BLNK) carries a higher beta of 3. 11 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (AMSC: +396. 8%, BLNK: -97. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between KULR and AMSC and VICR and ENVX and BLNK?

These companies operate in different sectors (KULR (Technology) and AMSC (Industrials) and VICR (Technology) and ENVX (Industrials) and BLNK (Industrials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: KULR is a small-cap quality compounder stock; AMSC is a small-cap high-growth stock; VICR is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; ENVX is a small-cap high-growth stock; BLNK is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

KULR

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 58%
  • Gross Margin > 13%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

AMSC

High-Growth Quality Leader

  • Sector: Industrials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 10%
  • Net Margin > 28%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

VICR

Quality Mega-Cap Compounder

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Net Margin > 15%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

ENVX

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Industrials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 7%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

BLNK

Quality Business

  • Sector: Industrials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Gross Margin > 15%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform KULR and AMSC and VICR and ENVX and BLNK on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(KULR: 116.1% · AMSC: 21.4%)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.