Hardware, Equipment & Parts
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
KULR vs AMSC vs VICR vs ENVX vs BLNK
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Industrial - Machinery
Hardware, Equipment & Parts
Electrical Equipment & Parts
Engineering & Construction
KULR vs AMSC vs VICR vs ENVX vs BLNK — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Hardware, Equipment & Parts | Industrial - Machinery | Hardware, Equipment & Parts | Electrical Equipment & Parts | Engineering & Construction |
| Market Cap | $539M | $2.65B | $11.57B | $1.37B | $97M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $17M | $279M | $453M | $32M | $106M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-22M | $130M | $119M | $-157M | $-126M |
| Gross Margin | 22.1% | 30.6% | 57.3% | 15.4% | 26.0% |
| Operating Margin | -186.9% | 4.9% | 18.1% | -5.6% | -119.5% |
| Forward P/E | — | 15.9x | 92.5x | — | — |
| Total Debt | $2M | $3M | $13M | $21M | $11M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $30M | $79M | $403M | $106M | $42M |
KULR vs AMSC vs VICR vs ENVX vs BLNK — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jan 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| KULR Technology Gro… (KULR) | 100 | 27.2 | -72.8% |
| American Supercondu… (AMSC) | 100 | 223.3 | +123.3% |
| Vicor Corporation (VICR) | 100 | 296.4 | +196.4% |
| Enovix Corporation (ENVX) | 100 | 48.7 | -51.3% |
| Blink Charging Co. (BLNK) | 100 | 1.7 | -98.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: KULR vs AMSC vs VICR vs ENVX vs BLNK
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
KULR plays a supporting role in this comparison — it may shine differently against other peers.
AMSC carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure.
- Rev growth 53.0%, EPS growth 143.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 27.1%
- 53.0% revenue growth vs BLNK's -11.2%
- Better valuation composite
- 46.7% margin vs ENVX's -492.6%
VICR is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and long-term compounding is your priority.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 2.87
- 26.5% 10Y total return vs AMSC's 396.8%
- Lower volatility, beta 2.87, Low D/E 1.8%, current ratio 8.99x
- Beta 2.87, current ratio 8.99x
ENVX lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
Among these 5 stocks, BLNK doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 53.0% revenue growth vs BLNK's -11.2% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 46.7% margin vs ENVX's -492.6% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 2.87 vs ENVX's 3.35, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 5 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +5.2% vs KULR's -73.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 18.1% ROA vs BLNK's -66.7%, ROIC -0.9% vs -109.7% |
KULR vs AMSC vs VICR vs ENVX vs BLNK — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
KULR vs AMSC vs VICR vs ENVX vs BLNK — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
VICR leads in 2 of 6 categories
KULR leads 0 • AMSC leads 0 • ENVX leads 0 • BLNK leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
VICR leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
VICR is the larger business by revenue, generating $453M annually — 27.1x KULR's $17M. AMSC is the more profitable business, keeping 46.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to ENVX's -4.9%. On growth, KULR holds the edge at +116.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $17M | $279M | $453M | $32M | $106M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$28M | $18M | $103M | -$142M | -$115M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$22M | $130M | $119M | -$157M | -$126M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$37M | $16M | $119M | -$114M | -$47M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +22.1% | +30.6% | +57.3% | +15.4% | +26.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -186.9% | +4.9% | +18.1% | -5.6% | -119.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -133.5% | +46.7% | +26.2% | -4.9% | -118.7% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -2.2% | +5.7% | +26.3% | -3.6% | -44.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +116.1% | +21.4% | +11.5% | +15.9% | +11.7% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -15.5% | +39.9% | +3.4% | +20.0% | +99.9% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — VICR and BLNK each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 98.3x trailing earnings, VICR trades at a 72% valuation discount to AMSC's 344.9x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, VICR's 194.0x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than AMSC's 471.5x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $539M | $2.6B | $11.6B | $1.4B | $97M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $511M | $2.6B | $11.2B | $1.3B | $66M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -30.78x | 344.94x | 98.26x | -8.81x | -0.43x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 15.94x | 92.55x | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 2.19x | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 471.48x | 194.00x | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 50.22x | 11.89x | 28.37x | 43.13x | 0.78x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 9.39x | 10.56x | 16.19x | 5.01x | 0.72x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 102.43x | 97.02x | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — AMSC and VICR each lead in 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
AMSC delivers a 24.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $24 in annual profit, vs $-132 for BLNK. AMSC carries lower financial leverage with a 0.02x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to BLNK's 0.09x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), AMSC scores 7/9 vs BLNK's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -15.0% | +24.3% | +18.7% | -0.1% | -131.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -14.3% | +18.1% | +16.6% | -0.0% | -66.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -86.5% | -0.9% | +8.9% | -74.2% | -109.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -49.0% | -0.6% | +5.7% | -27.5% | -77.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 7 | 7 | 5 | 3 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.03x | 0.02x | 0.02x | 0.08x | 0.09x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$28M | -$76M | -$390M | -$85M | -$31M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $30M | $79M | $403M | $106M | $42M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $2M | $3M | $13M | $21M | $11M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -52.40x | — | — | -7.03x | -9064.60x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — AMSC and VICR each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in AMSC five years ago would be worth $39,648 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $281 for BLNK. Over the past 12 months, VICR leads with a +524.2% total return vs KULR's -73.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors AMSC at 141.9% vs BLNK's -50.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -9.7% | +74.8% | +119.5% | -16.2% | +14.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -73.0% | +158.0% | +524.2% | +2.0% | +1.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -46.4% | +1315.1% | +496.6% | -50.4% | -88.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -81.9% | +296.5% | +218.0% | -47.1% | -97.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -75.9% | +396.8% | +2651.8% | -47.3% | -97.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -18.8% | +141.9% | +81.4% | -20.8% | -50.9% |
Risk & Volatility
VICR leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
VICR is the less volatile stock with a 2.87 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than ENVX's 3.35 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. VICR currently trades 87.2% from its 52-week high vs KULR's 20.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 3.24x | 2.98x | 2.87x | 3.35x | 3.11x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $14.24 | $70.49 | $293.95 | $16.49 | $2.65 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.94 | $20.70 | $40.54 | $4.62 | $0.45 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +20.3% | +78.3% | +87.2% | +40.1% | +31.9% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 56.2 | 64.7 | 59.9 | 52.1 | 58.0 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.2M | 1.1M | 860K | 5.6M | 2.2M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: KULR as "Buy", AMSC as "Buy", VICR as "Buy", ENVX as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 66.4% upside for ENVX (target: $11) vs -5.8% for AMSC (target: $52).
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy | — |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $52.00 | $245.00 | $11.00 | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 2 | 15 | 7 | 16 | — |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | 0 | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.1% | +0.0% | +0.3% | +4.3% | 0.0% |
VICR leads in 2 of 6 categories — strongest in Income & Cash Flow and Risk & Volatility. 3 categories are tied.
KULR vs AMSC vs VICR vs ENVX vs BLNK: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is KULR or AMSC or VICR or ENVX or BLNK a better buy right now?
For growth investors, American Superconductor Corporation (AMSC) is the stronger pick with 53.
0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -11. 2% for Blink Charging Co. (BLNK). Vicor Corporation (VICR) offers the better valuation at 98. 3x trailing P/E (92. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate KULR Technology Group, Inc. (KULR) a "Buy" — based on 2 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — KULR or AMSC or VICR or ENVX or BLNK?
On trailing P/E, Vicor Corporation (VICR) is the cheapest at 98.
3x versus American Superconductor Corporation at 344. 9x. On forward P/E, American Superconductor Corporation is actually cheaper at 15. 9x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — KULR or AMSC or VICR or ENVX or BLNK?
Over the past 5 years, American Superconductor Corporation (AMSC) delivered a total return of +296.
5%, compared to -97. 2% for Blink Charging Co. (BLNK). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: VICR returned +26. 5% versus BLNK's -97. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — KULR or AMSC or VICR or ENVX or BLNK?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Vicor Corporation (VICR) is the lower-risk stock at 2.
87β versus Enovix Corporation's 3. 35β — meaning ENVX is approximately 17% more volatile than VICR relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, American Superconductor Corporation (AMSC) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 2% versus 9% for Blink Charging Co. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — KULR or AMSC or VICR or ENVX or BLNK?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), American Superconductor Corporation (AMSC) is pulling ahead at 53.
0% versus -11. 2% for Blink Charging Co. (BLNK). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Vicor Corporation grew EPS 1764% year-over-year, compared to 38. 9% for Blink Charging Co.. Over a 3-year CAGR, BLNK leads at 82. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — KULR or AMSC or VICR or ENVX or BLNK?
Vicor Corporation (VICR) is the more profitable company, earning 29.
1% net margin versus -492. 6% for Enovix Corporation — meaning it keeps 29. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: VICR leads at 9. 0% versus -557. 0% for ENVX. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — VICR leads at 52. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is KULR or AMSC or VICR or ENVX or BLNK more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, American Superconductor Corporation (AMSC) trades at 15.
9x forward P/E versus 92. 5x for Vicor Corporation — 76. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for ENVX: 66. 4% to $11. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — KULR or AMSC or VICR or ENVX or BLNK?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is KULR or AMSC or VICR or ENVX or BLNK better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, American Superconductor Corporation (AMSC) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (+396.
8% 10Y return). Blink Charging Co. (BLNK) carries a higher beta of 3. 11 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (AMSC: +396. 8%, BLNK: -97. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between KULR and AMSC and VICR and ENVX and BLNK?
These companies operate in different sectors (KULR (Technology) and AMSC (Industrials) and VICR (Technology) and ENVX (Industrials) and BLNK (Industrials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: KULR is a small-cap quality compounder stock; AMSC is a small-cap high-growth stock; VICR is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; ENVX is a small-cap high-growth stock; BLNK is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.