Communication Equipment
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
KVHI vs GSAT vs GILT vs VSAT vs SHEN
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Telecommunications Services
Communication Equipment
Communication Equipment
Telecommunications Services
KVHI vs GSAT vs GILT vs VSAT vs SHEN — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Communication Equipment | Telecommunications Services | Communication Equipment | Communication Equipment | Telecommunications Services |
| Market Cap | $199M | $10.33B | $1.38B | $8.64B | $898M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $118M | $262M | $452M | $4.62B | $266M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-5M | $-50M | $21M | $-185M | $-36M |
| Gross Margin | 17.0% | 57.2% | 29.5% | 48.8% | 37.9% |
| Operating Margin | -7.7% | 1.4% | 3.6% | -1.0% | -10.3% |
| Forward P/E | 92.7x | — | 37.7x | — | — |
| Total Debt | $4M | $542M | $11M | $7.52B | $642M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $70M | $391M | $169M | $1.61B | $27M |
KVHI vs GSAT vs GILT vs VSAT vs SHEN — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| KVH Industries, Inc. (KVHI) | 100 | 111.0 | +11.0% |
| Globalstar, Inc. (GSAT) | 100 | 1826.9 | +1726.9% |
| Gilat Satellite Net… (GILT) | 100 | 225.4 | +125.4% |
| Viasat, Inc. (VSAT) | 100 | 157.9 | +57.9% |
| Shenandoah Telecomm… (SHEN) | 100 | 30.8 | -69.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: KVHI vs GSAT vs GILT vs VSAT vs SHEN
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
KVHI is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if sleep-well-at-night and defensive is your priority.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.43, Low D/E 3.4%, current ratio 7.07x
- Beta 0.43, current ratio 7.07x
- Beta 0.43 vs VSAT's 2.92, lower leverage
Among these 5 stocks, GSAT doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
GILT carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 47.9%, EPS growth -22.7%, 3Y rev CAGR 23.5%
- 358.8% 10Y total return vs GSAT's 201.8%
- 47.9% revenue growth vs KVHI's -2.5%
- Better valuation composite
VSAT ranks third and is worth considering specifically for momentum.
- +6.1% vs SHEN's +41.3%
SHEN is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability.
- Dividend streak 3 yrs, beta 0.89, yield 0.7%
- 0.7% yield, 3-year raise streak, vs GSAT's 0.1%, (3 stocks pay no dividend)
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 47.9% revenue growth vs KVHI's -2.5% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 4.6% margin vs GSAT's -19.0% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.43 vs VSAT's 2.92, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 0.7% yield, 3-year raise streak, vs GSAT's 0.1%, (3 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +6.1% vs SHEN's +41.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 2.8% ROA vs VSAT's -3.6%, ROIC 5.7% vs -0.7% |
KVHI vs GSAT vs GILT vs VSAT vs SHEN — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
KVHI vs GSAT vs GILT vs VSAT vs SHEN — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
GILT leads in 2 of 6 categories
KVHI leads 1 • GSAT leads 1 • SHEN leads 1 • VSAT leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
GILT leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
VSAT is the larger business by revenue, generating $4.6B annually — 39.1x KVHI's $118M. GILT is the more profitable business, keeping 4.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to GSAT's -19.0%. On growth, GILT holds the edge at +75.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $118M | $262M | $452M | $4.6B | $266M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$1M | $93M | $40M | $1.3B | $104M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$5M | -$50M | $21M | -$185M | -$36M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $1M | $151M | $10M | $907M | -$276M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +17.0% | +57.2% | +29.5% | +48.8% | +37.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -7.7% | +1.4% | +3.6% | -1.0% | -10.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -4.3% | -19.0% | +4.6% | -4.0% | -13.7% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +1.1% | +57.6% | +2.2% | +19.6% | -103.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +27.2% | +2.1% | +75.3% | +3.0% | -100.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +133.3% | -121.9% | -38.1% | +173.2% | -18.2% |
Valuation Metrics
KVHI leads this category, winning 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, VSAT's 11.5x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than GSAT's 119.1x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $199M | $10.3B | $1.4B | $8.6B | $898M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $133M | $10.5B | $1.2B | $14.5B | $1.5B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -26.84x | -138.10x | 55.41x | -14.81x | -22.86x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 92.73x | — | 37.68x | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 119.09x | 27.81x | 11.51x | 13.80x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.79x | 41.28x | 3.05x | 1.91x | 2.51x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.51x | 28.58x | 2.27x | 1.86x | 0.92x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 20.37x | 57.85x | 150.06x | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
GILT leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
GILT delivers a 4.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $4 in annual profit, vs $-14 for GSAT. GILT carries lower financial leverage with a 0.02x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to VSAT's 1.62x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), GSAT scores 5/9 vs SHEN's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -3.8% | -13.7% | +4.1% | -4.0% | -3.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -3.3% | -2.3% | +2.8% | -3.6% | -2.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -10.8% | -0.1% | +5.7% | -0.7% | -1.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -8.2% | -0.1% | +4.7% | -0.7% | -1.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 5 | 3 | 5 | 3 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.03x | 1.51x | 0.02x | 1.62x | 0.66x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$66M | $151M | -$158M | $5.9B | $614M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $70M | $391M | $169M | $1.6B | $27M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $4M | $542M | $11M | $7.5B | $642M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -1369.17x | -0.07x | 5.18x | 6.37x | -0.65x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
GSAT leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in GSAT five years ago would be worth $49,382 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $7,209 for SHEN. Over the past 12 months, VSAT leads with a +614.8% total return vs SHEN's +41.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors GSAT at 80.1% vs SHEN's -4.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +44.3% | +27.3% | +40.5% | +76.3% | +43.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +104.0% | +305.2% | +186.3% | +614.8% | +41.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -0.2% | +484.1% | +247.0% | +80.1% | -13.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -27.1% | +393.8% | +95.0% | +33.8% | -27.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +26.2% | +201.8% | +358.8% | -12.1% | +21.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -0.1% | +80.1% | +51.4% | +21.7% | -4.8% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — KVHI and GSAT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
KVHI is the less volatile stock with a 0.43 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than VSAT's 2.92 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. GSAT currently trades 98.3% from its 52-week high vs GILT's 91.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.43x | 2.08x | 2.09x | 2.92x | 0.89x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $11.10 | $82.85 | $20.56 | $68.92 | $17.34 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $4.93 | $17.24 | $5.43 | $8.61 | $9.66 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +91.9% | +98.3% | +91.6% | +96.2% | +93.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 68.0 | 66.4 | 63.1 | 67.3 | 55.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 127K | 1.5M | 650K | 1.5M | 300K |
Analyst Outlook
SHEN leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: KVHI as "Buy", GSAT as "Hold", GILT as "Buy", VSAT as "Buy", SHEN as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 78.7% upside for SHEN (target: $29) vs -62.8% for GILT (target: $7). For income investors, SHEN offers the higher dividend yield at 0.72% vs GSAT's 0.10%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $13.00 | $66.00 | $7.00 | $57.67 | $29.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 4 | 5 | 2 | 20 | 8 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +0.1% | — | — | +0.7% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 2 | 1 | — | 3 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.08 | — | — | $0.12 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.9% | 0.0% | 0.0% | +0.1% | 0.0% |
GILT leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). KVHI leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
KVHI vs GSAT vs GILT vs VSAT vs SHEN: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is KVHI or GSAT or GILT or VSAT or SHEN a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Gilat Satellite Networks Ltd.
(GILT) is the stronger pick with 47. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -2. 5% for KVH Industries, Inc. (KVHI). Gilat Satellite Networks Ltd. (GILT) offers the better valuation at 55. 4x trailing P/E (37. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate KVH Industries, Inc. (KVHI) a "Buy" — based on 4 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — KVHI or GSAT or GILT or VSAT or SHEN?
On forward P/E, Gilat Satellite Networks Ltd.
is actually cheaper at 37. 7x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — KVHI or GSAT or GILT or VSAT or SHEN?
Over the past 5 years, Globalstar, Inc.
(GSAT) delivered a total return of +393. 8%, compared to -27. 9% for Shenandoah Telecommunications Company (SHEN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: GILT returned +358. 8% versus VSAT's -12. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — KVHI or GSAT or GILT or VSAT or SHEN?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), KVH Industries, Inc.
(KVHI) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 43β versus Viasat, Inc. 's 2. 92β — meaning VSAT is approximately 575% more volatile than KVHI relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Gilat Satellite Networks Ltd. (GILT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 2% versus 162% for Viasat, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — KVHI or GSAT or GILT or VSAT or SHEN?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Gilat Satellite Networks Ltd.
(GILT) is pulling ahead at 47. 9% versus -2. 5% for KVH Industries, Inc. (KVHI). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Viasat, Inc. grew EPS 50. 9% year-over-year, compared to -195. 0% for Globalstar, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, GSAT leads at 26. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — KVHI or GSAT or GILT or VSAT or SHEN?
Gilat Satellite Networks Ltd.
(GILT) is the more profitable company, earning 4. 6% net margin versus -25. 2% for Globalstar, Inc. — meaning it keeps 4. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: GILT leads at 4. 5% versus -10. 1% for KVHI. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — GSAT leads at 66. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is KVHI or GSAT or GILT or VSAT or SHEN more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Gilat Satellite Networks Ltd.
(GILT) trades at 37. 7x forward P/E versus 92. 7x for KVH Industries, Inc. — 55. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for SHEN: 78. 7% to $29. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — KVHI or GSAT or GILT or VSAT or SHEN?
In this comparison, SHEN (0.
7% yield), GSAT (0. 1% yield) pay a dividend. KVHI, GILT, VSAT do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is KVHI or GSAT or GILT or VSAT or SHEN better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Shenandoah Telecommunications Company (SHEN) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
89), 0. 7% yield). Viasat, Inc. (VSAT) carries a higher beta of 2. 92 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (SHEN: +21. 6%, VSAT: -12. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between KVHI and GSAT and GILT and VSAT and SHEN?
These companies operate in different sectors (KVHI (Technology) and GSAT (Communication Services) and GILT (Technology) and VSAT (Technology) and SHEN (Communication Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: KVHI is a small-cap quality compounder stock; GSAT is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; GILT is a small-cap high-growth stock; VSAT is a small-cap quality compounder stock; SHEN is a small-cap quality compounder stock. SHEN pays a dividend while KVHI, GSAT, GILT, VSAT do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
- Sector: Communication Services
- Market Cap > $100B
- Gross Margin > 22%
- Dividend Yield > 0.5%
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.