KVHI
KVH Industries, Inc.
Communication Equipment
Market Cap$199M
5Y Perf.-30.8%
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Try these comparisons:
Stock Comparison
KVHI vs SHEN vs GSAT vs LUMN vs FYBR
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
SHEN
Shenandoah Telecommunications Company
Telecommunications Services
Market Cap$898M
5Y Perf.-68.5%
GSAT
Globalstar, Inc.
Telecommunications Services
Market Cap$10.33B
5Y Perf.+242.9%
LUMN
Lumen Technologies, Inc.
Telecommunications Services
Market Cap$8.71B
5Y Perf.-36.1%
FYBR
Frontier Communications Parent, Inc.
Telecommunications Services
Market Cap$9.64B
5Y Perf.+52.4%
KVHI vs SHEN vs GSAT vs LUMN vs FYBR — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | KVHI | SHEN | GSAT | LUMN | FYBR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Communication Equipment | Telecommunications Services | Telecommunications Services | Telecommunications Services | Telecommunications Services |
| Market Cap | $199M | $898M | $10.33B | $8.71B | $9.64B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $118M | $266M | $262M | $12.12B | $6.11B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-5M | $-36M | $-50M | $-1.74B | $-381M |
| Gross Margin | 17.0% | 37.9% | 57.2% | 35.2% | 65.1% |
| Operating Margin | -7.7% | -10.3% | 1.4% | -2.6% | 5.3% |
| Forward P/E | 92.7x | — | — | — | — |
| Total Debt | $4M | $642M | $542M | $17.71B | $12.03B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $70M | $27M | $391M | $1.00B | $806M |
KVHI vs SHEN vs GSAT vs LUMN vs FYBR — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
KVHI
SHEN
GSAT
LUMN
FYBR
| Stock | May 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| KVH Industries, Inc. (KVHI) | 100 | 69.2 | -30.8% |
| Shenandoah Telecomm… (SHEN) | 100 | 31.5 | -68.5% |
| Globalstar, Inc. (GSAT) | 100 | 342.9 | +242.9% |
| Lumen Technologies,… (LUMN) | 100 | 63.9 | -36.1% |
| Frontier Communicat… (FYBR) | 100 | 152.4 | +52.4% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: KVHI vs SHEN vs GSAT vs LUMN vs FYBR
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: KVHI and GSAT are tied at the top with 2 categories each (5-stock set) — the right choice depends on your priorities. Globalstar, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion and recent price momentum and sentiment. FYBR and SHEN also each lead in at least one category. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
KVHI
KVH Industries, Inc.
The Defensive Pick
KVHI has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in sleep-well-at-night.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.43, Low D/E 3.4%, current ratio 7.07x
- Better valuation composite
- -4.3% margin vs GSAT's -19.0%
Best for: sleep-well-at-night
SHEN
Shenandoah Telecommunications Company
The Income Pick
SHEN is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and defensive.
- Dividend streak 3 yrs, beta 0.89, yield 0.7%
- Beta 0.89, yield 0.7%, current ratio 0.90x
- 0.7% yield, 3-year raise streak, vs GSAT's 0.1%, (2 stocks pay no dividend)
Best for: income & stability and defensive
GSAT
Globalstar, Inc.
The Growth Play
GSAT is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and long-term compounding is your priority.
- Rev growth 11.9%, EPS growth -195.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 26.3%
- 201.8% 10Y total return vs FYBR's 42.8%
- 11.9% revenue growth vs LUMN's -5.4%
- +305.2% vs FYBR's +5.5%
Best for: growth exposure and long-term compounding
LUMN
Lumen Technologies, Inc.
The Communication Services Pick
Among these 5 stocks, LUMN doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
Best for: communication services exposure
FYBR
Frontier Communications Parent, Inc.
The Defensive Choice
FYBR ranks third and is worth considering specifically for stability and efficiency.
- Beta 0.06 vs LUMN's 2.74
- -1.8% ROA vs LUMN's -5.3%, ROIC 1.7% vs -0.8%
Best for: stability and efficiency
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | GSAT | 11.9% revenue growth vs LUMN's -5.4% |
| Value | KVHI | Better valuation composite |
| Quality / Margins | KVHI | -4.3% margin vs GSAT's -19.0% |
| Stability / Safety | FYBR | Beta 0.06 vs LUMN's 2.74 |
| Dividends | SHEN | 0.7% yield, 3-year raise streak, vs GSAT's 0.1%, (2 stocks pay no dividend) |
| Momentum (1Y) | GSAT | +305.2% vs FYBR's +5.5% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | FYBR | -1.8% ROA vs LUMN's -5.3%, ROIC 1.7% vs -0.8% |
KVHI vs SHEN vs GSAT vs LUMN vs FYBR — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
FY 2025
FY 2025
FY 2024
FY 2025
FY 2024
KVHI vs SHEN vs GSAT vs LUMN vs FYBR — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLFYBRLAGGINGLUMN
Who Leads Where
FYBR leads in 2 of 6 categories
KVHI leads 1 • LUMN leads 1 • GSAT leads 1 • SHEN leads 1
Explore the data ↓LUMNLumen Technologies, I…
1leads
GSATGlobalstar, Inc.
1leads
SHENShenandoah Telecommun…
1leads
KVHIKVH Industries, Inc.
1leads
FYBRFrontier Communicatio…
2leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs KVHIvs SHENMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
KVHI3/6
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
LUMN2/5
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
FYBR5/9
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
GSAT5/6
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
FYBR2/2
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
SHEN2/2
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
KVHI leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
LUMN is the larger business by revenue, generating $12.1B annually — 102.8x KVHI's $118M. KVHI is the more profitable business, keeping -4.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to GSAT's -19.0%. On growth, KVHI holds the edge at +27.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | KVHIKVH Industries, I… | SHENShenandoah Teleco… | GSATGlobalstar, Inc. | LUMNLumen Technologie… | FYBRFrontier Communic… |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $118M | $266M | $262M | $12.1B | $6.1B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$1M | $104M | $93M | $2.4B | $2.1B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$5M | -$36M | -$50M | -$1.7B | -$381M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $1M | -$276M | $151M | $5.4B | -$1.4B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +17.0% | +37.9% | +57.2% | +35.2% | +65.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -7.7% | -10.3% | +1.4% | -2.6% | +5.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -4.3% | -13.7% | -19.0% | -14.3% | -6.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +1.1% | -103.5% | +57.6% | +44.9% | -23.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +27.2% | -100.0% | +2.1% | -8.9% | +4.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +133.3% | -18.2% | -121.9% | 0.0% | +9.1% |
KVHI leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
LUMN leads this category, winning 2 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, LUMN's 9.9x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than GSAT's 119.1x.
| Metric | KVHIKVH Industries, I… | SHENShenandoah Teleco… | GSATGlobalstar, Inc. | LUMNLumen Technologie… | FYBRFrontier Communic… |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $199M | $898M | $10.3B | $8.7B | $9.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $133M | $1.5B | $10.5B | $25.4B | $20.9B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -26.84x | -22.86x | -138.10x | -4.83x | -29.61x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 92.73x | — | — | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 13.80x | 119.09x | 9.91x | 10.55x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.79x | 2.51x | 41.28x | 0.70x | 1.62x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.51x | 0.92x | 28.58x | — | 1.93x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 20.37x | — | 57.85x | 23.49x | — |
LUMN leads this category, winning 2 of 5 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
FYBR leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
SHEN delivers a -3.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-4 in annual profit, vs $-79 for LUMN. KVHI carries lower financial leverage with a 0.03x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to FYBR's 2.44x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), GSAT scores 5/9 vs SHEN's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | KVHIKVH Industries, I… | SHENShenandoah Teleco… | GSATGlobalstar, Inc. | LUMNLumen Technologie… | FYBRFrontier Communic… |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -3.8% | -3.7% | -13.7% | -79.4% | -8.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -3.3% | -2.0% | -2.3% | -5.3% | -1.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -10.8% | -1.1% | -0.1% | -0.8% | +1.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -8.2% | -1.3% | -0.1% | -0.6% | +1.8% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 3 | 5 | 4 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.03x | 0.66x | 1.51x | — | 2.44x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$66M | $614M | $151M | $16.7B | $11.2B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $70M | $27M | $391M | $1.0B | $806M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $4M | $642M | $542M | $17.7B | $12.0B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -1369.17x | -0.65x | -0.07x | -1.12x | 0.44x |
FYBR leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
GSAT leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in GSAT five years ago would be worth $49,382 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $7,119 for LUMN. Over the past 12 months, GSAT leads with a +305.2% total return vs FYBR's +5.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors GSAT at 80.1% vs SHEN's -4.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | KVHIKVH Industries, I… | SHENShenandoah Teleco… | GSATGlobalstar, Inc. | LUMNLumen Technologie… | FYBRFrontier Communic… |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +44.3% | +43.5% | +27.3% | +10.0% | +1.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +104.0% | +41.3% | +305.2% | +100.0% | +5.5% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -0.2% | -13.6% | +484.1% | +267.8% | +105.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -27.1% | -27.9% | +393.8% | -28.8% | +48.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +26.2% | +21.6% | +201.8% | -35.7% | +42.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -0.1% | -4.8% | +80.1% | +54.4% | +27.1% |
GSAT leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
FYBR leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
FYBR is the less volatile stock with a 0.06 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than LUMN's 2.74 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. FYBR currently trades 100.0% from its 52-week high vs LUMN's 70.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | KVHIKVH Industries, I… | SHENShenandoah Teleco… | GSATGlobalstar, Inc. | LUMNLumen Technologie… | FYBRFrontier Communic… |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.43x | 0.89x | 2.08x | 2.74x | 0.06x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $11.10 | $17.34 | $82.85 | $11.95 | $38.50 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $4.93 | $9.66 | $17.24 | $3.37 | $36.04 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +91.9% | +93.6% | +98.3% | +70.8% | +100.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 68.0 | 55.2 | 66.4 | 73.4 | 72.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 127K | 300K | 1.5M | 12.5M | 0 |
FYBR leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
SHEN leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: KVHI as "Buy", SHEN as "Buy", GSAT as "Hold", LUMN as "Hold", FYBR as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 78.7% upside for SHEN (target: $29) vs -19.0% for GSAT (target: $66). For income investors, SHEN offers the higher dividend yield at 0.72% vs GSAT's 0.10%.
| Metric | KVHIKVH Industries, I… | SHENShenandoah Teleco… | GSATGlobalstar, Inc. | LUMNLumen Technologie… | FYBRFrontier Communic… |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Hold | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $13.00 | $29.00 | $66.00 | $7.08 | $34.33 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 4 | 8 | 5 | 28 | 11 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +0.7% | +0.1% | +0.0% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 3 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.12 | $0.08 | $0.00 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.9% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | +0.7% |
SHEN leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway
FYBR leads in 2 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Risk & Volatility). KVHI leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow).
Best OverallFrontier Communications Par… (FYBR)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
KVHI vs SHEN vs GSAT vs LUMN vs FYBR: Key Questions Answered
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is KVHI or SHEN or GSAT or LUMN or FYBR a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Globalstar, Inc.
(GSAT) is the stronger pick with 11. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -5. 4% for Lumen Technologies, Inc. (LUMN). Analysts rate KVH Industries, Inc. (KVHI) a "Buy" — based on 4 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — KVHI or SHEN or GSAT or LUMN or FYBR?
Over the past 5 years, Globalstar, Inc.
(GSAT) delivered a total return of +393. 8%, compared to -28. 8% for Lumen Technologies, Inc. (LUMN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: GSAT returned +201. 8% versus LUMN's -35. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — KVHI or SHEN or GSAT or LUMN or FYBR?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Frontier Communications Parent, Inc.
(FYBR) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 06β versus Lumen Technologies, Inc. 's 2. 74β — meaning LUMN is approximately 4157% more volatile than FYBR relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, KVH Industries, Inc. (KVHI) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 3% versus 2% for Frontier Communications Parent, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — KVHI or SHEN or GSAT or LUMN or FYBR?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Globalstar, Inc.
(GSAT) is pulling ahead at 11. 9% versus -5. 4% for Lumen Technologies, Inc. (LUMN). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: KVH Industries, Inc. grew EPS 33. 3% year-over-year, compared to -30. 4% for Lumen Technologies, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, GSAT leads at 26. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — KVHI or SHEN or GSAT or LUMN or FYBR?
Frontier Communications Parent, Inc.
(FYBR) is the more profitable company, earning -5. 4% net margin versus -25. 2% for Globalstar, Inc. — meaning it keeps -5. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: FYBR leads at 5. 9% versus -10. 1% for KVHI. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — GSAT leads at 66. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is KVHI or SHEN or GSAT or LUMN or FYBR more undervalued right now?
Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for SHEN: 78.
7% to $29. 00.
07Which pays a better dividend — KVHI or SHEN or GSAT or LUMN or FYBR?
In this comparison, SHEN (0.
7% yield), GSAT (0. 1% yield) pay a dividend. KVHI, LUMN, FYBR do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
08Is KVHI or SHEN or GSAT or LUMN or FYBR better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Frontier Communications Parent, Inc.
(FYBR) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 06)). Lumen Technologies, Inc. (LUMN) carries a higher beta of 2. 74 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (FYBR: +42. 8%, LUMN: -35. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between KVHI and SHEN and GSAT and LUMN and FYBR?
These companies operate in different sectors (KVHI (Technology) and SHEN (Communication Services) and GSAT (Communication Services) and LUMN (Communication Services) and FYBR (Communication Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
SHEN pays a dividend while KVHI, GSAT, LUMN, FYBR do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
- Sector: Communication Services
- Market Cap > $100B
- Gross Margin > 22%
- Dividend Yield > 0.5%
Revenue Growth>
%
(KVHI: 27.2% · SHEN: -100.0%)You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.