Compare Stocks

2 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

KWR vs BCPC

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
KWR
Quaker Chemical Corporation

Chemicals - Specialty

Basic MaterialsNYSE • US
Market Cap$2.46B
5Y Perf.-16.3%
BCPC
Balchem Corporation

Chemicals - Specialty

Basic MaterialsNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$5.17B
5Y Perf.+58.5%

KWR vs BCPC — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
KWR logoKWR
BCPC logoBCPC
IndustryChemicals - SpecialtyChemicals - Specialty
Market Cap$2.46B$5.17B
Revenue (TTM)$1.93B$1.06B
Net Income (TTM)$4M$158M
Gross Margin34.4%36.3%
Operating Margin3.7%21.0%
Forward P/E19.3x30.9x
Total Debt$929M$192M
Cash & Equiv.$180M$75M

KWR vs BCPCLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

KWR
BCPC
StockMay 20May 26Return
Quaker Chemical Cor… (KWR)10083.7-16.3%
Balchem Corporation (BCPC)100158.5+58.5%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: KWR vs BCPC

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: BCPC leads in 4 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and profitability and margin quality. Quaker Chemical Corporation is the stronger pick specifically for valuation and capital efficiency and dividend income and shareholder returns. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
KWR
Quaker Chemical Corporation
The Defensive Pick

KWR is the clearest fit if your priority is defensive.

  • Beta 1.35, yield 1.4%, current ratio 2.42x
  • Lower P/E (19.3x vs 30.9x)
  • 1.4% yield, 6-year raise streak, vs BCPC's 0.5%
Best for: defensive
BCPC
Balchem Corporation
The Income Pick

BCPC carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.

  • Dividend streak 11 yrs, beta 0.33, yield 0.5%
  • Rev growth 8.8%, EPS growth 20.9%, 3Y rev CAGR 3.2%
  • 162.8% 10Y total return vs KWR's 81.8%
Best for: income & stability and growth exposure
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthBCPC logoBCPC8.8% revenue growth vs KWR's 2.7%
ValueKWR logoKWRLower P/E (19.3x vs 30.9x)
Quality / MarginsBCPC logoBCPC15.0% margin vs KWR's 0.2%
Stability / SafetyBCPC logoBCPCBeta 0.33 vs KWR's 1.35, lower leverage
DividendsKWR logoKWR1.4% yield, 6-year raise streak, vs BCPC's 0.5%
Momentum (1Y)KWR logoKWR+44.4% vs BCPC's -0.8%
Efficiency (ROA)BCPC logoBCPC9.4% ROA vs KWR's 0.2%, ROIC 12.2% vs 6.6%

KWR vs BCPC — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

KWRQuaker Chemical Corporation
FY 2025
Metalworking and Other
67.7%$1.3B
Metals
32.3%$611M
BCPCBalchem Corporation
FY 2025
Product Sales
99.8%$1.0B
Royalty
0.2%$2M

KWR vs BCPC — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLBCPCLAGGINGKWR

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

BCPC leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

KWR is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.9B annually — 1.8x BCPC's $1.1B. BCPC is the more profitable business, keeping 15.0% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to KWR's 0.2%.

MetricKWR logoKWRQuaker Chemical C…BCPC logoBCPCBalchem Corporati…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$1.9B$1.1B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$143M$267M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$4M$158M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$143M$182M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+34.4%+36.3%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+3.7%+21.0%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+0.2%+15.0%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+7.4%+17.2%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+8.5%+8.1%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+54.8%+10.6%
BCPC leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

KWR leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

On an enterprise value basis, KWR's 11.9x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than BCPC's 20.1x.

MetricKWR logoKWRQuaker Chemical C…BCPC logoBCPCBalchem Corporati…
Market CapShares × price$2.5B$5.2B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$3.2B$5.3B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-1013.29x33.97x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.19.32x30.87x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate2.65x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple11.86x20.06x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue1.30x4.98x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share1.80x4.18x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF30.51x29.86x
KWR leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

BCPC leads this category, winning 9 of 9 comparable metrics.

BCPC delivers a 12.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $12 in annual profit, vs $0 for KWR. BCPC carries lower financial leverage with a 0.15x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to KWR's 0.67x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), BCPC scores 9/9 vs KWR's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricKWR logoKWRQuaker Chemical C…BCPC logoBCPCBalchem Corporati…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+0.3%+12.4%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+0.2%+9.4%
ROICReturn on invested capital+6.6%+12.2%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+7.6%+14.8%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–949
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.67x0.15x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$749M$117M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$180M$75M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$929M$192M
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense1.41x15.23x
BCPC leads this category, winning 9 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

BCPC leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in BCPC five years ago would be worth $12,441 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $6,377 for KWR. Over the past 12 months, KWR leads with a +44.4% total return vs BCPC's -0.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors BCPC at 8.6% vs KWR's -11.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricKWR logoKWRQuaker Chemical C…BCPC logoBCPCBalchem Corporati…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+2.8%+4.8%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+44.4%-0.8%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-30.6%+28.0%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-36.2%+24.4%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+81.8%+162.8%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-11.5%+8.6%
BCPC leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

BCPC leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

BCPC is the less volatile stock with a 0.33 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than KWR's 1.35 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. BCPC currently trades 87.8% from its 52-week high vs KWR's 77.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricKWR logoKWRQuaker Chemical C…BCPC logoBCPCBalchem Corporati…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5001.35x0.33x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$183.00$183.90
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$99.18$139.17
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+77.5%+87.8%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10056.332.3
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded178K189K
BCPC leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Evenly matched — KWR and BCPC each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Wall Street rates KWR as "Buy" and BCPC as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 24.3% upside for KWR (target: $176) vs 0.4% for BCPC (target: $162). For income investors, KWR offers the higher dividend yield at 1.39% vs BCPC's 0.54%.

MetricKWR logoKWRQuaker Chemical C…BCPC logoBCPCBalchem Corporati…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$176.33$162.00
# AnalystsCovering analysts1410
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+1.4%+0.5%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises611
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$1.97$0.87
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap+1.7%+2.1%
Evenly matched — KWR and BCPC each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

BCPC leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). KWR leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.

Best OverallBalchem Corporation (BCPC)Leads 4 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

KWR vs BCPC: Frequently Asked Questions

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is KWR or BCPC a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Balchem Corporation (BCPC) is the stronger pick with 8.

8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 2. 7% for Quaker Chemical Corporation (KWR). Balchem Corporation (BCPC) offers the better valuation at 34. 0x trailing P/E (30. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Quaker Chemical Corporation (KWR) a "Buy" — based on 14 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — KWR or BCPC?

On forward P/E, Quaker Chemical Corporation is actually cheaper at 19.

3x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — KWR or BCPC?

Over the past 5 years, Balchem Corporation (BCPC) delivered a total return of +24.

4%, compared to -36. 2% for Quaker Chemical Corporation (KWR). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: BCPC returned +160. 5% versus KWR's +88. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — KWR or BCPC?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Balchem Corporation (BCPC) is the lower-risk stock at 0.

33β versus Quaker Chemical Corporation's 1. 35β — meaning KWR is approximately 308% more volatile than BCPC relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Balchem Corporation (BCPC) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 15% versus 67% for Quaker Chemical Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — KWR or BCPC?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Balchem Corporation (BCPC) is pulling ahead at 8.

8% versus 2. 7% for Quaker Chemical Corporation (KWR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Balchem Corporation grew EPS 20. 9% year-over-year, compared to -102. 2% for Quaker Chemical Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, BCPC leads at 3. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — KWR or BCPC?

Balchem Corporation (BCPC) is the more profitable company, earning 14.

9% net margin versus -0. 1% for Quaker Chemical Corporation — meaning it keeps 14. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: BCPC leads at 21. 1% versus 9. 4% for KWR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — KWR leads at 36. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is KWR or BCPC more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, Quaker Chemical Corporation (KWR) trades at 19.

3x forward P/E versus 30. 9x for Balchem Corporation — 11. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for KWR: 24. 3% to $176. 33.

08

Which pays a better dividend — KWR or BCPC?

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

Quaker Chemical Corporation (KWR) offers the highest yield at 1. 4%, versus 0. 5% for Balchem Corporation (BCPC).

09

Is KWR or BCPC better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Balchem Corporation (BCPC) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.

33), 0. 5% yield, +160. 5% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (BCPC: +160. 5%, KWR: +88. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between KWR and BCPC?

Both stocks operate in the Basic Materials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.

Stocks Like

KWR

Stable Dividend Mega-Cap

  • Sector: Basic Materials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Gross Margin > 20%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

BCPC

Stable Dividend Mega-Cap

  • Sector: Basic Materials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Net Margin > 8%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform KWR and BCPC on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(KWR: 8.5% · BCPC: 8.1%)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.