Telecommunications Services
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
KYIV vs LILA
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Telecommunications Services
KYIV vs LILA — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Telecommunications Services | Telecommunications Services |
| Market Cap | $2.91B | $1.56B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $919M | $4.44B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $283M | $-498M |
| Gross Margin | 64.2% | 50.8% |
| Operating Margin | 37.9% | 4.3% |
| Forward P/E | 8.8x | — |
| Total Debt | $894M | $9.22B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $429M | $14M |
Quick Verdict: KYIV vs LILA
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
KYIV has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 0.4%, EPS growth 0.8%
- 20.9% 10Y total return vs LILA's -79.9%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.62, Low D/E 82.8%, current ratio 1.36x
LILA is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and defensive.
- Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 0.71
- Beta 0.71, current ratio 1.14x
- Better valuation composite
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 0.4% revenue growth vs LILA's -0.3% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 30.8% margin vs LILA's -11.2% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.71 vs KYIV's 1.62 | |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +42.0% vs KYIV's +20.9% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 13.5% ROA vs LILA's -5.5%, ROIC 16.4% vs 5.6% |
KYIV vs LILA — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
KYIV vs LILA — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
KYIV leads this category, winning 4 of 4 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
LILA is the larger business by revenue, generating $4.4B annually — 4.8x KYIV's $919M. KYIV is the more profitable business, keeping 30.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to LILA's -11.2%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $919M | $4.4B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | — | $1.1B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | — | -$498M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | — | $345M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +64.2% | +50.8% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +37.9% | +4.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +30.8% | -11.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +19.8% | +7.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | -0.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +84.1% |
Valuation Metrics
LILA leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, KYIV's 6.6x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than LILA's 6.6x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $2.9B | $1.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $3.4B | $10.8B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 10.25x | -2.55x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 8.79x | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 6.61x | 6.63x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 3.17x | 0.35x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.70x | 1.47x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 16.00x | 5.11x |
Profitability & Efficiency
KYIV leads this category, winning 8 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
KYIV delivers a 28.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $29 in annual profit, vs $-41 for LILA. KYIV carries lower financial leverage with a 0.83x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to LILA's 8.67x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +28.8% | -41.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +13.5% | -5.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +16.4% | +5.6% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +22.9% | +6.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.83x | 8.67x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $465M | $9.2B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $429M | $14M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $894M | $9.2B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 4.24x | 1.10x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
KYIV leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in KYIV five years ago would be worth $12,090 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $5,397 for LILA. Over the past 12 months, LILA leads with a +42.0% total return vs KYIV's +20.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors KYIV at 6.5% vs LILA's -2.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -5.0% | +7.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +20.9% | +42.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +20.9% | -6.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +20.9% | -46.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +20.9% | -79.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +6.5% | -2.2% |
Risk & Volatility
LILA leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
LILA is the less volatile stock with a 0.71 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than KYIV's 1.62 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. LILA currently trades 86.4% from its 52-week high vs KYIV's 76.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.62x | 0.71x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $16.48 | $9.04 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $9.29 | $4.25 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +76.5% | +86.4% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 68.1 | 48.7 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 714K | 261K |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Consensus price targets imply 38.8% upside for KYIV (target: $18) vs 2.4% for LILA (target: $8).
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $17.50 | $8.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 15 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 2 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% |
KYIV leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). LILA leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Risk & Volatility).
KYIV vs LILA: Frequently Asked Questions
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is KYIV or LILA a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Kyivstar Group Ltd.
Common Shares (KYIV) is the stronger pick with 0. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -0. 3% for Liberty Latin America Ltd. (LILA). Kyivstar Group Ltd. Common Shares (KYIV) offers the better valuation at 10. 3x trailing P/E (8. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Liberty Latin America Ltd. (LILA) a "Buy" — based on 15 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — KYIV or LILA?
Over the past 5 years, Kyivstar Group Ltd.
Common Shares (KYIV) delivered a total return of +20. 9%, compared to -46. 0% for Liberty Latin America Ltd. (LILA). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: KYIV returned +20. 9% versus LILA's -79. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — KYIV or LILA?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Liberty Latin America Ltd.
(LILA) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 71β versus Kyivstar Group Ltd. Common Shares's 1. 62β — meaning KYIV is approximately 130% more volatile than LILA relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Kyivstar Group Ltd. Common Shares (KYIV) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 83% versus 9% for Liberty Latin America Ltd. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — KYIV or LILA?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Kyivstar Group Ltd.
Common Shares (KYIV) is pulling ahead at 0. 4% versus -0. 3% for Liberty Latin America Ltd. (LILA). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Liberty Latin America Ltd. grew EPS 8. 4% year-over-year, compared to 0. 8% for Kyivstar Group Ltd. Common Shares. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — KYIV or LILA?
Kyivstar Group Ltd.
Common Shares (KYIV) is the more profitable company, earning 30. 8% net margin versus -13. 8% for Liberty Latin America Ltd. — meaning it keeps 30. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: KYIV leads at 37. 9% versus 16. 2% for LILA. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — KYIV leads at 64. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is KYIV or LILA more undervalued right now?
Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for KYIV: 38.
8% to $17. 50.
07Which pays a better dividend — KYIV or LILA?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
08Is KYIV or LILA better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Liberty Latin America Ltd.
(LILA) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 71)). Kyivstar Group Ltd. Common Shares (KYIV) carries a higher beta of 1. 62 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (LILA: -79. 9%, KYIV: +20. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between KYIV and LILA?
Both stocks operate in the Communication Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: KYIV is a small-cap deep-value stock; LILA is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.