Build Your Comparison

Side-by-side financial analysis
KZR logo
KZR
IMVT logo
IMVT
ARDX logo
ARDX
RCUS logo
RCUS
JPM logo
JPM
Try popular comparisons:

Stock Comparison

KZR vs IMVT vs ARDX vs RCUS vs JPM

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
KZR
Kezar Life Sciences, Inc.

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$54M
5Y Perf.-98.6%
IMVT
Immunovant, Inc.

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$6.90B
5Y Perf.+11.5%
ARDX
Ardelyx, Inc.

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$1.40B
5Y Perf.+265.9%
RCUS
Arcus Biosciences, Inc.

Biotechnology

HealthcareNYSE • US
Market Cap$2.40B
5Y Perf.+3.1%
JPM
JPMorgan Chase & Co.

Banks - Diversified

Financial ServicesNYSE • US
Market Cap$896.00B
5Y Perf.+233.0%

KZR vs IMVT vs ARDX vs RCUS vs JPM — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
KZR logoKZR
IMVT logoIMVT
ARDX logoARDX
RCUS logoRCUS
JPM logoJPM
IndustryBiotechnologyBiotechnologyBiotechnologyBiotechnologyBanks - Diversified
Market Cap$54M$6.90B$1.40B$2.40B$896.00B
Revenue (TTM)$0.00$0.00$428M$236M$280.33B
Net Income (TTM)$-45M$-506M$-58M$-369M$57.05B
Gross Margin91.9%90.7%60.0%
Operating Margin-8.7%-168.6%25.9%
Forward P/E14.4x
Total Debt$2M$72K$212M$99M$942.38B
Cash & Equiv.$72M$902M$68M$222M$343.34B

KZR vs IMVT vs ARDX vs RCUS vs JPMLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

KZR
IMVT
ARDX
RCUS
JPM
StockJun 20May 26Return
Kezar Life Sciences… (KZR)1001.4-98.6%
Immunovant, Inc. (IMVT)100111.5+11.5%
Ardelyx, Inc. (ARDX)100365.9+265.9%
Arcus Biosciences, … (RCUS)100103.1+3.1%
JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM)100333.0+233.0%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: KZR vs IMVT vs ARDX vs RCUS vs JPM

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: JPM leads in 3 of 6 categories (5-stock set), making it the strongest pick for profitability and margin quality and dividend income and shareholder returns. Kezar Life Sciences, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion and capital preservation and lower volatility. RCUS also leads in specific categories worth noting. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
🥇JPM emerged as the overall leader. Track its performance:
KZR
Kezar Life Sciences, Inc.
The Income Pick

KZR is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.

  • beta 0.72
  • Lower volatility, beta 0.72, Low D/E 3.3%, current ratio 11.52x
  • Beta 0.72, current ratio 11.52x
  • 42.6% revenue growth vs IMVT's -22.2%
Best for: income & stability and sleep-well-at-night
IMVT
Immunovant, Inc.
The Long-Run Compounder

IMVT is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.

  • 237.9% 10Y total return vs JPM's 465.8%
Best for: long-term compounding
ARDX
Ardelyx, Inc.
The Growth Play

ARDX is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.

  • Rev growth 22.1%, EPS growth -52.9%, 3Y rev CAGR 98.4%
Best for: growth exposure
RCUS
Arcus Biosciences, Inc.
The Momentum Pick

RCUS ranks third and is worth considering specifically for momentum.

  • +154.5% vs JPM's +21.8%
Best for: momentum
JPM
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
The Banking Pick

JPM carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for quality and dividends.

  • 20.4% margin vs RCUS's -156.4%
  • 1.9% yield; 15-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
  • 1.3% ROA vs IMVT's -62.2%
Best for: quality and dividends
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthKZR logoKZR42.6% revenue growth vs IMVT's -22.2%
Quality / MarginsJPM logoJPM20.4% margin vs RCUS's -156.4%
Stability / SafetyKZR logoKZRBeta 0.72 vs RCUS's 2.00, lower leverage
DividendsJPM logoJPM1.9% yield; 15-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)RCUS logoRCUS+154.5% vs JPM's +21.8%
Efficiency (ROA)JPM logoJPM1.3% ROA vs IMVT's -62.2%

KZR vs IMVT vs ARDX vs RCUS vs JPM — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

KZRKezar Life Sciences, Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

IMVTImmunovant, Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

ARDXArdelyx, Inc.
FY 2025
Product
57.5%$378M
Product, IBSRELA
41.7%$274M
License
0.8%$5M
RCUSArcus Biosciences, Inc.
FY 2025
License And Development Services
87.4%$221M
Development Services
6.7%$17M
R&D Services
3.2%$8M
License
2.8%$7M
JPMJPMorgan Chase & Co.
FY 2025
Commercial And Investment Bank
43.0%$78.5B
Consumer & Community Banking
41.7%$76.0B
Asset and Wealth Management Segment
13.2%$24.1B
Segment Reporting, Reconciling Item, Corporate Nonsegment
3.9%$7.0B
Segment Reconciling Items
-1.7%$-3,134,000,000

KZR vs IMVT vs ARDX vs RCUS vs JPM — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLJPMLAGGINGRCUS

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

JPM leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

JPM and IMVT operate at a comparable scale, with $280.3B and $0 in trailing revenue. JPM is the more profitable business, keeping 20.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to RCUS's -156.4%. On growth, ARDX holds the edge at +27.5% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricKZR logoKZRKezar Life Scienc…IMVT logoIMVTImmunovant, Inc.ARDX logoARDXArdelyx, Inc.RCUS logoRCUSArcus Biosciences…JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …
RevenueTrailing 12 months$0$0$428M$236M$280.3B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax-$41M-$532M-$35M-$391M$81.4B
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$45M-$506M-$58M-$369M$57.0B
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$42M-$407M-$37M-$489M$100.9B
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+91.9%+90.7%+60.0%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue-8.7%-168.6%+25.9%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue-13.6%-156.4%+20.4%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue-8.8%-2.1%+36.0%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+27.5%-39.3%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+65.6%-14.1%+11.8%+10.5%+16.0%
JPM leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

Evenly matched — KZR and ARDX and JPM each lead in 1 of 3 comparable metrics.
MetricKZR logoKZRKezar Life Scienc…IMVT logoIMVTImmunovant, Inc.ARDX logoARDXArdelyx, Inc.RCUS logoRCUSArcus Biosciences…JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …
Market CapShares × price$54M$6.9B$1.4B$2.4B$896.0B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash-$16M$6.0B$1.5B$2.3B$1.50T
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-0.95x-12.14x-21.88x-7.23x16.00x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.14.40x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate0.90x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple18.36x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue3.43x9.70x3.20x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share0.76x7.19x8.21x4.05x2.47x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF8.88x
Evenly matched — KZR and ARDX and JPM each lead in 1 of 3 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

JPM leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

JPM delivers a 15.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $16 in annual profit, vs $-69 for RCUS. IMVT carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to JPM's 2.60x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), JPM scores 5/9 vs RCUS's 0/9, reflecting solid financial health.

MetricKZR logoKZRKezar Life Scienc…IMVT logoIMVTImmunovant, Inc.ARDX logoARDXArdelyx, Inc.RCUS logoRCUSArcus Biosciences…JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …
ROE (TTM)Return on equity-58.4%-68.2%-38.1%-69.0%+15.9%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-51.5%-62.2%-11.8%-35.3%+1.3%
ROICReturn on invested capital-85.3%-10.7%-64.1%+4.5%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-53.8%-68.3%-10.6%-42.1%+8.9%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–942305
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.03x0.00x1.27x0.16x2.60x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash-$70M-$902M$144M-$123M$599.0B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$72M$902M$68M$222M$343.3B
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$2M$72,000$212M$99M$942.4B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense-38.59x-0.28x-13.38x0.74x
JPM leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

JPM leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in IMVT five years ago would be worth $31,304 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $126 for KZR. Over the past 12 months, RCUS leads with a +154.5% total return vs JPM's +21.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors JPM at 33.6% vs KZR's -69.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricKZR logoKZRKezar Life Scienc…IMVT logoIMVTImmunovant, Inc.ARDX logoARDXArdelyx, Inc.RCUS logoRCUSArcus Biosciences…JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+15.9%+29.8%-7.5%+2.2%-0.5%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+52.2%+110.9%+53.0%+154.5%+21.8%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-97.0%+55.0%+42.6%+18.3%+138.2%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-98.7%+213.0%+207.6%-3.1%+118.2%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-99.6%+237.9%+162.2%+40.0%+465.8%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-69.0%+15.7%+12.6%+5.8%+33.6%
JPM leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

KZR leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

KZR is the less volatile stock with a 0.72 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than RCUS's 2.00 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. KZR currently trades 96.6% from its 52-week high vs ARDX's 67.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricKZR logoKZRKezar Life Scienc…IMVT logoIMVTImmunovant, Inc.ARDX logoARDXArdelyx, Inc.RCUS logoRCUSArcus Biosciences…JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5000.72x1.66x1.01x2.00x0.94x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$7.55$36.27$8.40$28.72$337.25
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$3.53$14.32$3.49$7.91$262.71
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+96.6%+92.7%+67.7%+82.9%+95.1%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10052.457.945.046.559.1
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded111K1.9M3.4M1.1M7.0M
KZR leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.

Analyst consensus: KZR as "Hold", IMVT as "Buy", ARDX as "Buy", RCUS as "Buy", JPM as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 198.8% upside for ARDX (target: $17) vs -17.7% for KZR (target: $6). JPM is the only dividend payer here at 1.86% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.

MetricKZR logoKZRKezar Life Scienc…IMVT logoIMVTImmunovant, Inc.ARDX logoARDXArdelyx, Inc.RCUS logoRCUSArcus Biosciences…JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellHoldBuyBuyBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$6.00$43.67$17.00$31.00$339.75
# AnalystsCovering analysts723161861
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+1.9%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises15
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$5.95
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%+3.9%
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Key Takeaway

JPM leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). KZR leads in 1 (Risk & Volatility). 1 tied.

Best OverallJPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

KZR vs IMVT vs ARDX vs RCUS vs JPM: Key Questions Answered

9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is KZR or IMVT or ARDX or RCUS or JPM a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Ardelyx, Inc.

(ARDX) is the stronger pick with 22. 1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -4. 3% for Arcus Biosciences, Inc. (RCUS). JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) offers the better valuation at 16. 0x trailing P/E (14. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Immunovant, Inc. (IMVT) a "Buy" — based on 23 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which is the better long-term investment — KZR or IMVT or ARDX or RCUS or JPM?

Over the past 5 years, Immunovant, Inc.

(IMVT) delivered a total return of +213. 0%, compared to -98. 7% for Kezar Life Sciences, Inc. (KZR). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: JPM returned +465. 8% versus KZR's -99. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

03

Which is safer — KZR or IMVT or ARDX or RCUS or JPM?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Kezar Life Sciences, Inc.

(KZR) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 72β versus Arcus Biosciences, Inc. 's 2. 00β — meaning RCUS is approximately 178% more volatile than KZR relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Immunovant, Inc. (IMVT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 3% for JPMorgan Chase & Co. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

04

Which is growing faster — KZR or IMVT or ARDX or RCUS or JPM?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Ardelyx, Inc.

(ARDX) is pulling ahead at 22. 1% versus -4. 3% for Arcus Biosciences, Inc. (RCUS). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: JPMorgan Chase & Co. grew EPS 1. 5% year-over-year, compared to -566. 1% for Kezar Life Sciences, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, ARDX leads at 98. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

05

Which has better profit margins — KZR or IMVT or ARDX or RCUS or JPM?

JPMorgan Chase & Co.

(JPM) is the more profitable company, earning 20. 4% net margin versus -142. 9% for Arcus Biosciences, Inc. — meaning it keeps 20. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: JPM leads at 26. 0% versus -156. 3% for RCUS. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — RCUS leads at 96. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

06

Is KZR or IMVT or ARDX or RCUS or JPM more undervalued right now?

Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for ARDX: 198.

8% to $17. 00.

07

Which pays a better dividend — KZR or IMVT or ARDX or RCUS or JPM?

In this comparison, JPM (1.

9% yield) pays a dividend. KZR, IMVT, ARDX, RCUS do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

08

Is KZR or IMVT or ARDX or RCUS or JPM better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, JPMorgan Chase & Co.

(JPM) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 94), 1. 9% yield, +465. 8% 10Y return). Arcus Biosciences, Inc. (RCUS) carries a higher beta of 2. 00 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (JPM: +465. 8%, RCUS: +40. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

09

What are the main differences between KZR and IMVT and ARDX and RCUS and JPM?

These companies operate in different sectors (KZR (Healthcare) and IMVT (Healthcare) and ARDX (Healthcare) and RCUS (Healthcare) and JPM (Financial Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: KZR is a small-cap quality compounder stock; IMVT is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ARDX is a small-cap high-growth stock; RCUS is a small-cap quality compounder stock; JPM is a large-cap deep-value stock. JPM pays a dividend while KZR, IMVT, ARDX, RCUS do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.