LAKE
Lakeland Industries, Inc.
Apparel - Manufacturers
Market Cap$106M
5Y Perf.-25.2%
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Try these comparisons:
Stock Comparison
LAKE vs AMZN
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
AMZN
Amazon.com, Inc.
Specialty Retail
Market Cap$2.92T
5Y Perf.+122.1%
LAKE vs AMZN — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | LAKE | AMZN |
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Apparel - Manufacturers | Specialty Retail |
| Market Cap | $106M | $2.92T |
| Revenue (TTM) | $193M | $742.78B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-38M | $90.80B |
| Gross Margin | 34.8% | 50.6% |
| Operating Margin | -7.2% | 11.5% |
| Forward P/E | — | 34.8x |
| Total Debt | $32M | $152.99B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $17M | $86.81B |
LAKE vs AMZN — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
LAKE
AMZN
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Lakeland Industries… (LAKE) | 100 | 74.8 | -25.2% |
| Amazon.com, Inc. (AMZN) | 100 | 222.1 | +122.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: LAKE vs AMZN
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: LAKE and AMZN are tied at the top with 3 categories each — the right choice depends on your priorities. Amazon.com, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for profitability and margin quality and recent price momentum and sentiment. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
LAKE
Lakeland Industries, Inc.
The Income Pick
LAKE carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 1.35, yield 1.1%
- Rev growth 34.1%, EPS growth -437.5%, 3Y rev CAGR 12.2%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.35, Low D/E 21.6%, current ratio 3.91x
Best for: income & stability and growth exposure
AMZN
Amazon.com, Inc.
The Long-Run Compounder
AMZN is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 7.0% 10Y total return vs LAKE's 34.0%
- 12.2% margin vs LAKE's -19.4%
- +43.7% vs LAKE's -33.3%
Best for: long-term compounding
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | LAKE | 34.1% revenue growth vs AMZN's 12.4% |
| Quality / Margins | AMZN | 12.2% margin vs LAKE's -19.4% |
| Stability / Safety | LAKE | Beta 1.35 vs AMZN's 1.51, lower leverage |
| Dividends | LAKE | 1.1% yield; the other pay no meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | AMZN | +43.7% vs LAKE's -33.3% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | AMZN | 11.5% ROA vs LAKE's -17.0%, ROIC 14.7% vs -5.1% |
LAKE vs AMZN — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
FY 2014
FY 2025
LAKE vs AMZN — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLAMZNLAGGINGLAKE
LAKELakeland Industries, …
1leads
AMZNAmazon.com, Inc.
3leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs LAKEMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
AMZN6/6
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
LAKE3/3
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
AMZN6/9
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
AMZN5/6
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
Tied
—
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
—
—
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
AMZN leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
AMZN is the larger business by revenue, generating $742.8B annually — 3839.5x LAKE's $193M. AMZN is the more profitable business, keeping 12.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to LAKE's -19.4%. On growth, AMZN holds the edge at +16.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | LAKELakeland Industri… | AMZNAmazon.com, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $193M | $742.8B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$11M | $155.9B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$38M | $90.8B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$16M | -$2.5B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +34.8% | +50.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -7.2% | +11.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -19.4% | +12.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -8.2% | -0.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +4.0% | +16.6% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -165.0% | +74.8% |
AMZN leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
LAKE leads this category, winning 3 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | LAKELakeland Industri… | AMZNAmazon.com, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $106M | $2.92T |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $120M | $2.98T |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -4.46x | 37.82x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 34.77x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 1.35x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 20.47x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.64x | 4.07x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.55x | 7.14x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 378.98x |
LAKE leads this category, winning 3 of 3 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
AMZN leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
AMZN delivers a 23.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $23 in annual profit, vs $-28 for LAKE. LAKE carries lower financial leverage with a 0.22x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to AMZN's 0.37x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), AMZN scores 6/9 vs LAKE's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | LAKELakeland Industri… | AMZNAmazon.com, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -27.9% | +23.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -17.0% | +11.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -5.1% | +14.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -5.9% | +15.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.22x | 0.37x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $14M | $66.2B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $17M | $86.8B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $32M | $153.0B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -23.38x | 39.96x |
AMZN leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
AMZN leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in AMZN five years ago would be worth $16,476 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $4,174 for LAKE. Over the past 12 months, AMZN leads with a +43.7% total return vs LAKE's -33.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors AMZN at 36.8% vs LAKE's -1.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | LAKELakeland Industri… | AMZNAmazon.com, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +22.5% | +19.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -33.3% | +43.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -4.0% | +156.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -58.3% | +64.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +34.0% | +697.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -1.3% | +36.8% |
AMZN leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — LAKE and AMZN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
LAKE is the less volatile stock with a 1.35 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than AMZN's 1.51 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. AMZN currently trades 97.3% from its 52-week high vs LAKE's 52.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | LAKELakeland Industri… | AMZNAmazon.com, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.35x | 1.51x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $20.50 | $278.56 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $7.15 | $185.01 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +52.9% | +97.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 50.8 | 81.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 100K | 45.5M |
Evenly matched — LAKE and AMZN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates LAKE as "Buy" and AMZN as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 29.2% upside for LAKE (target: $14) vs 13.1% for AMZN (target: $307). LAKE is the only dividend payer here at 1.10% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | LAKELakeland Industri… | AMZNAmazon.com, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $14.00 | $306.77 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 9 | 94 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +1.1% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.12 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.4% | 0.0% |
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Key Takeaway
AMZN leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). LAKE leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
Best OverallAmazon.com, Inc. (AMZN)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
LAKE vs AMZN: Frequently Asked Questions
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is LAKE or AMZN a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Lakeland Industries, Inc.
(LAKE) is the stronger pick with 34. 1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 12. 4% for Amazon. com, Inc. (AMZN). Amazon. com, Inc. (AMZN) offers the better valuation at 37. 8x trailing P/E (34. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Lakeland Industries, Inc. (LAKE) a "Buy" — based on 9 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — LAKE or AMZN?
Over the past 5 years, Amazon.
com, Inc. (AMZN) delivered a total return of +64. 8%, compared to -58. 3% for Lakeland Industries, Inc. (LAKE). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: AMZN returned +697. 8% versus LAKE's +34. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — LAKE or AMZN?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Lakeland Industries, Inc.
(LAKE) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 35β versus Amazon. com, Inc. 's 1. 51β — meaning AMZN is approximately 12% more volatile than LAKE relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Lakeland Industries, Inc. (LAKE) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 22% versus 37% for Amazon. com, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — LAKE or AMZN?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Lakeland Industries, Inc.
(LAKE) is pulling ahead at 34. 1% versus 12. 4% for Amazon. com, Inc. (AMZN). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Amazon. com, Inc. grew EPS 29. 7% year-over-year, compared to -437. 5% for Lakeland Industries, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, LAKE leads at 12. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — LAKE or AMZN?
Amazon.
com, Inc. (AMZN) is the more profitable company, earning 10. 8% net margin versus -10. 8% for Lakeland Industries, Inc. — meaning it keeps 10. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: AMZN leads at 11. 2% versus -5. 5% for LAKE. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — AMZN leads at 50. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is LAKE or AMZN more undervalued right now?
Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for LAKE: 29.
2% to $14. 00.
07Which pays a better dividend — LAKE or AMZN?
In this comparison, LAKE (1.
1% yield) pays a dividend. AMZN does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
08Is LAKE or AMZN better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Lakeland Industries, Inc.
(LAKE) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (1. 1% yield). Amazon. com, Inc. (AMZN) carries a higher beta of 1. 51 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (LAKE: +34. 0%, AMZN: +697. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between LAKE and AMZN?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: LAKE is a small-cap high-growth stock; AMZN is a mega-cap quality compounder stock. LAKE pays a dividend while AMZN does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
Revenue Growth>
%
(LAKE: 4.0% · AMZN: 16.6%)You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.