Apparel - Manufacturers
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
LAKE vs KFRC vs HURN vs MSA
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Staffing & Employment Services
Consulting Services
Security & Protection Services
LAKE vs KFRC vs HURN vs MSA — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Apparel - Manufacturers | Staffing & Employment Services | Consulting Services | Security & Protection Services |
| Market Cap | $106M | $790M | $2.02B | $6.67B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $193M | $1.33B | $1.74B | $1.92B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-38M | $35M | $104M | $291M |
| Gross Margin | 34.8% | 27.2% | 23.3% | 46.8% |
| Operating Margin | -7.2% | 3.8% | 11.3% | 22.0% |
| Forward P/E | — | 18.0x | 14.2x | 19.8x |
| Total Debt | $32M | $70M | $548M | $627M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $17M | $2M | $25M | $165M |
LAKE vs KFRC vs HURN vs MSA — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Lakeland Industries… (LAKE) | 100 | 74.8 | -25.2% |
| Kforce Inc. (KFRC) | 100 | 143.1 | +43.1% |
| Huron Consulting Gr… (HURN) | 100 | 269.7 | +169.7% |
| MSA Safety Incorpor… (MSA) | 100 | 144.5 | +44.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: LAKE vs KFRC vs HURN vs MSA
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
LAKE is the clearest fit if your priority is growth.
- 34.1% revenue growth vs KFRC's -5.4%
KFRC carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 8 yrs, beta 0.53, yield 3.6%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.53, Low D/E 56.0%, current ratio 1.78x
- Beta 0.53, yield 3.6%, current ratio 1.78x
- Beta 0.53 vs LAKE's 1.35
HURN is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 14.3%, EPS growth -6.9%, 3Y rev CAGR 14.5%
- Lower P/E (14.2x vs 19.8x)
MSA is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if long-term compounding is your priority.
- 294.0% 10Y total return vs HURN's 116.8%
- 15.2% margin vs LAKE's -19.4%
- 11.4% ROA vs LAKE's -17.0%, ROIC 17.9% vs -5.1%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 34.1% revenue growth vs KFRC's -5.4% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (14.2x vs 19.8x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 15.2% margin vs LAKE's -19.4% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.53 vs LAKE's 1.35 | |
| Dividends | 3.6% yield, 8-year raise streak, vs MSA's 1.2%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +18.9% vs LAKE's -33.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 11.4% ROA vs LAKE's -17.0%, ROIC 17.9% vs -5.1% |
LAKE vs KFRC vs HURN vs MSA — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
LAKE vs KFRC vs HURN vs MSA — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
HURN leads in 2 of 6 categories
MSA leads 1 • KFRC leads 1 • LAKE leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MSA leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MSA is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.9B annually — 9.9x LAKE's $193M. MSA is the more profitable business, keeping 15.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to LAKE's -19.4%. On growth, HURN holds the edge at +14.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $193M | $1.3B | $1.7B | $1.9B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$11M | $56M | $231M | $496M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$38M | $35M | $104M | $291M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$16M | $43M | $124M | $309M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +34.8% | +27.2% | +23.3% | +46.8% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -7.2% | +3.8% | +11.3% | +22.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -19.4% | +2.6% | +6.0% | +15.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -8.2% | +3.3% | +7.1% | +16.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +4.0% | +0.1% | +14.2% | +10.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -165.0% | +2.2% | +0.8% | +21.2% |
Valuation Metrics
HURN leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 21.4x trailing earnings, HURN trades at a 12% valuation discount to MSA's 24.2x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, HURN's 11.0x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than KFRC's 15.4x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $106M | $790M | $2.0B | $6.7B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $120M | $858M | $2.5B | $7.1B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -4.46x | 22.05x | 21.37x | 24.25x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 17.96x | 14.18x | 19.76x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | 1.38x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 15.42x | 10.99x | 15.05x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.64x | 0.59x | 1.19x | 3.56x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.55x | 6.17x | 4.25x | 4.95x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 16.88x | 11.06x | 22.56x |
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — LAKE and KFRC and MSA each lead in 3 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
KFRC delivers a 27.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $27 in annual profit, vs $-28 for LAKE. LAKE carries lower financial leverage with a 0.22x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to HURN's 1.04x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), MSA scores 6/9 vs LAKE's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -27.9% | +27.2% | +21.8% | +22.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -17.0% | +9.2% | +6.8% | +11.4% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -5.1% | +19.1% | +15.0% | +17.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -5.9% | +20.1% | +18.6% | +19.2% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.22x | 0.56x | 1.04x | 0.46x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $14M | $68M | $524M | $462M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $17M | $2M | $25M | $165M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $32M | $70M | $548M | $627M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -23.38x | — | 7.70x | 12.70x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
HURN leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in HURN five years ago would be worth $22,023 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $4,174 for LAKE. Over the past 12 months, KFRC leads with a +18.9% total return vs LAKE's -33.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors HURN at 17.6% vs KFRC's -4.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +22.5% | +39.2% | -27.1% | +6.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -33.3% | +18.9% | -17.2% | +11.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -4.0% | -13.8% | +62.5% | +31.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -58.3% | -16.8% | +120.2% | +9.7% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +34.0% | +195.5% | +116.8% | +294.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -1.3% | -4.8% | +17.6% | +9.6% |
Risk & Volatility
KFRC leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
KFRC is the less volatile stock with a 0.53 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than LAKE's 1.35 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. KFRC currently trades 91.0% from its 52-week high vs LAKE's 52.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.35x | 0.53x | 0.82x | 0.90x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $20.50 | $47.48 | $186.78 | $208.92 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $7.15 | $24.49 | $112.45 | $151.10 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +52.9% | +91.0% | +66.8% | +82.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 50.8 | 65.6 | 37.4 | 55.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 100K | 305K | 243K | 209K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — KFRC and MSA each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: LAKE as "Buy", KFRC as "Hold", HURN as "Buy", MSA as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 64.3% upside for KFRC (target: $71) vs 29.2% for LAKE (target: $14). For income investors, KFRC offers the higher dividend yield at 3.58% vs LAKE's 1.10%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $14.00 | $71.00 | $200.00 | $235.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 9 | 10 | 9 | 11 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +1.1% | +3.6% | — | +1.2% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 8 | 1 | 12 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.12 | $1.55 | — | $2.09 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.4% | +6.4% | +8.2% | +1.3% |
HURN leads in 2 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Total Returns). MSA leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow). 2 tied.
LAKE vs KFRC vs HURN vs MSA: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is LAKE or KFRC or HURN or MSA a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Lakeland Industries, Inc.
(LAKE) is the stronger pick with 34. 1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -5. 4% for Kforce Inc. (KFRC). Huron Consulting Group Inc. (HURN) offers the better valuation at 21. 4x trailing P/E (14. 2x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Lakeland Industries, Inc. (LAKE) a "Buy" — based on 9 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — LAKE or KFRC or HURN or MSA?
On trailing P/E, Huron Consulting Group Inc.
(HURN) is the cheapest at 21. 4x versus MSA Safety Incorporated at 24. 2x. On forward P/E, Huron Consulting Group Inc. is actually cheaper at 14. 2x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — LAKE or KFRC or HURN or MSA?
Over the past 5 years, Huron Consulting Group Inc.
(HURN) delivered a total return of +120. 2%, compared to -58. 3% for Lakeland Industries, Inc. (LAKE). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: MSA returned +294. 0% versus LAKE's +34. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — LAKE or KFRC or HURN or MSA?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Kforce Inc.
(KFRC) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 53β versus Lakeland Industries, Inc. 's 1. 35β — meaning LAKE is approximately 156% more volatile than KFRC relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Lakeland Industries, Inc. (LAKE) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 22% versus 104% for Huron Consulting Group Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — LAKE or KFRC or HURN or MSA?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Lakeland Industries, Inc.
(LAKE) is pulling ahead at 34. 1% versus -5. 4% for Kforce Inc. (KFRC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: MSA Safety Incorporated grew EPS -1. 7% year-over-year, compared to -437. 5% for Lakeland Industries, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, HURN leads at 14. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — LAKE or KFRC or HURN or MSA?
MSA Safety Incorporated (MSA) is the more profitable company, earning 14.
9% net margin versus -10. 8% for Lakeland Industries, Inc. — meaning it keeps 14. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MSA leads at 21. 4% versus -5. 5% for LAKE. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — MSA leads at 46. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is LAKE or KFRC or HURN or MSA more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Huron Consulting Group Inc.
(HURN) trades at 14. 2x forward P/E versus 19. 8x for MSA Safety Incorporated — 5. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for KFRC: 64. 3% to $71. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — LAKE or KFRC or HURN or MSA?
In this comparison, KFRC (3.
6% yield), MSA (1. 2% yield), LAKE (1. 1% yield) pay a dividend. HURN does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is LAKE or KFRC or HURN or MSA better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Kforce Inc.
(KFRC) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 53), 3. 6% yield, +195. 5% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (KFRC: +195. 5%, LAKE: +34. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between LAKE and KFRC and HURN and MSA?
These companies operate in different sectors (LAKE (Consumer Cyclical) and KFRC (Industrials) and HURN (Industrials) and MSA (Industrials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: LAKE is a small-cap high-growth stock; KFRC is a small-cap income-oriented stock; HURN is a small-cap quality compounder stock; MSA is a small-cap quality compounder stock. LAKE, KFRC, MSA pay a dividend while HURN does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.