Compare Stocks

4 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

LAR vs LAC vs SLI vs ALB

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
LAR
Lithium Argentina AG

Industrial Materials

Basic MaterialsNYSE • CH
Market Cap$1.85B
5Y Perf.+334.2%
LAC
Lithium Americas Corp.

Industrial Materials

Basic MaterialsNYSE • CA
Market Cap$1.37B
5Y Perf.+90.6%
SLI
Standard Lithium Ltd.

Industrial Materials

Basic MaterialsAMEX • CA
Market Cap$932M
5Y Perf.+167.8%
ALB
Albemarle Corporation

Chemicals - Specialty

Basic MaterialsNYSE • US
Market Cap$23.37B
5Y Perf.+130.4%

LAR vs LAC vs SLI vs ALB — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
LAR logoLAR
LAC logoLAC
SLI logoSLI
ALB logoALB
IndustryIndustrial MaterialsIndustrial MaterialsIndustrial MaterialsChemicals - Specialty
Market Cap$1.85B$1.37B$932M$23.37B
Revenue (TTM)$0.00$0.00$0.00$5.49B
Net Income (TTM)$-81M$-241M$166M$-233M
Gross Margin18.5%
Operating Margin5.6%
Forward P/E24.3x6.5x22.4x
Total Debt$211M$23M$989K$3.30B
Cash & Equiv.$86M$594M$39M$1.62B

LAR vs LAC vs SLI vs ALBLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

LAR
LAC
SLI
ALB
StockDec 24May 26Return
Lithium Argentina AG (LAR)100434.2+334.2%
Lithium Americas Co… (LAC)100190.6+90.6%
Standard Lithium Lt… (SLI)100267.8+167.8%
Albemarle Corporati… (ALB)100230.4+130.4%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: LAR vs LAC vs SLI vs ALB

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: SLI leads in 3 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and valuation and capital efficiency. Lithium Argentina AG is the stronger pick specifically for profitability and margin quality and recent price momentum and sentiment. LAC and ALB also each lead in at least one category. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
LAR
Lithium Argentina AG
The Long-Run Compounder

LAR is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if long-term compounding is your priority.

  • 321.3% 10Y total return vs LAC's 234.9%
  • 2.3% margin vs ALB's -4.2%
  • +460.3% vs LAC's +84.4%
Best for: long-term compounding
LAC
Lithium Americas Corp.
The Defensive Pick

LAC is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night and defensive.

  • Lower volatility, beta 1.42, Low D/E 2.4%, current ratio 10.33x
  • Beta 1.42, current ratio 10.33x
  • Beta 1.42 vs LAR's 1.79, lower leverage
Best for: sleep-well-at-night and defensive
SLI
Standard Lithium Ltd.
The Growth Play

SLI carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure.

  • EPS growth 428.0%
  • 401.6% revenue growth vs LAC's -6.0%
  • Lower P/E (6.5x vs 22.4x)
  • 60.4% ROA vs LAC's -16.6%, ROIC -16.9% vs -7.1%
Best for: growth exposure
ALB
Albemarle Corporation
The Income Pick

ALB is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability.

  • Dividend streak 15 yrs, beta 1.60, yield 0.8%
  • 0.8% yield; 15-year raise streak; the other 3 pay no meaningful dividend
Best for: income & stability
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthSLI logoSLI401.6% revenue growth vs LAC's -6.0%
ValueSLI logoSLILower P/E (6.5x vs 22.4x)
Quality / MarginsLAR logoLAR2.3% margin vs ALB's -4.2%
Stability / SafetyLAC logoLACBeta 1.42 vs LAR's 1.79, lower leverage
DividendsALB logoALB0.8% yield; 15-year raise streak; the other 3 pay no meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)LAR logoLAR+460.3% vs LAC's +84.4%
Efficiency (ROA)SLI logoSLI60.4% ROA vs LAC's -16.6%, ROIC -16.9% vs -7.1%

LAR vs LAC vs SLI vs ALB — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

LARLithium Argentina AG

Segment breakdown not available.

LACLithium Americas Corp.

Segment breakdown not available.

SLIStandard Lithium Ltd.
FY 2015
SLPE
35.4%$71M
High Power Group
34.8%$70M
SLMTI
29.8%$60M
ALBAlbemarle Corporation
FY 2025
Energy Storage
52.7%$2.7B
Specialties
26.6%$1.4B
Ketjen
20.7%$1.1B

LAR vs LAC vs SLI vs ALB — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLSLILAGGINGLAC

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

SLI leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.

ALB and SLI operate at a comparable scale, with $5.5B and $0 in trailing revenue.

MetricLAR logoLARLithium Argentina…LAC logoLACLithium Americas …SLI logoSLIStandard Lithium …ALB logoALBAlbemarle Corpora…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$0$0$0$5.5B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax-$37M-$32M-$7M$802M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$81M-$241M$166M-$233M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$33M-$648M-$23M$577M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+18.5%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+5.6%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue-4.2%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+10.5%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+32.7%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-38.0%-21.4%-103.3%
SLI leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.

Valuation Metrics

Evenly matched — LAR and LAC and ALB each lead in 1 of 3 comparable metrics.
MetricLAR logoLARLithium Argentina…LAC logoLACLithium Americas …SLI logoSLIStandard Lithium …ALB logoALBAlbemarle Corpora…
Market CapShares × price$1.8B$1.4B$932M$23.4B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$2.0B$801M$904M$25.1B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-126.39x-26.95x6.51x-34.50x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.24.29x22.36x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple33.21x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue4.55x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share2.06x1.20x2.82x2.39x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF33.76x
Evenly matched — LAR and LAC and ALB each lead in 1 of 3 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

SLI leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

SLI delivers a 68.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $68 in annual profit, vs $-27 for LAC. SLI carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to ALB's 0.34x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ALB scores 6/9 vs LAR's 1/9, reflecting solid financial health.

MetricLAR logoLARLithium Argentina…LAC logoLACLithium Americas …SLI logoSLIStandard Lithium …ALB logoALBAlbemarle Corpora…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity-9.2%-26.9%+68.2%-2.3%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-7.2%-16.6%+60.4%-1.4%
ROICReturn on invested capital-2.3%-7.1%-16.9%+0.6%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-3.7%-3.9%-21.0%+0.6%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–91236
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.24x0.02x0.00x0.34x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$125M-$571M-$52M$1.7B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$86M$594M$39M$1.6B
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$211M$23M$989,000$3.3B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense-2.26x2702.72x1.59x
SLI leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

LAR leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in LAR five years ago would be worth $42,130 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $6,869 for LAC. Over the past 12 months, LAR leads with a +460.3% total return vs LAC's +84.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors LAR at 61.5% vs LAC's -23.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricLAR logoLARLithium Argentina…LAC logoLACLithium Americas …SLI logoSLIStandard Lithium …ALB logoALBAlbemarle Corpora…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+90.2%+18.7%-18.2%+38.1%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+460.3%+84.4%+175.4%+256.7%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+321.3%-55.6%+17.1%+9.3%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+321.3%-31.3%+16.7%+26.8%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+321.3%+234.9%+220.5%+217.0%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+61.5%-23.7%+5.4%+3.0%
LAR leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — LAR and LAC each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

LAC is the less volatile stock with a 1.42 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than LAR's 1.79 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. LAR currently trades 94.9% from its 52-week high vs LAC's 53.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricLAR logoLARLithium Argentina…LAC logoLACLithium Americas …SLI logoSLIStandard Lithium …ALB logoALBAlbemarle Corpora…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5001.79x1.42x1.55x1.60x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$11.99$10.52$6.40$221.00
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$1.71$2.47$1.40$53.70
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+94.9%+53.8%+61.1%+89.8%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10075.669.157.053.0
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded3.3M9.0M1.8M2.0M
Evenly matched — LAR and LAC each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

ALB leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.

Analyst consensus: LAR as "Buy", LAC as "Hold", SLI as "Buy", ALB as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 23.7% upside for LAC (target: $7) vs -24.9% for LAR (target: $9). ALB is the only dividend payer here at 0.82% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.

MetricLAR logoLARLithium Argentina…LAC logoLACLithium Americas …SLI logoSLIStandard Lithium …ALB logoALBAlbemarle Corpora…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyHoldBuyHold
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$8.54$7.00$4.75$190.80
# AnalystsCovering analysts215345
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+0.8%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises115
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$1.62
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%
ALB leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Key Takeaway

SLI leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). LAR leads in 1 (Total Returns). 2 tied.

Best OverallStandard Lithium Ltd. (SLI)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

LAR vs LAC vs SLI vs ALB: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is LAR or LAC or SLI or ALB a better buy right now?

Standard Lithium Ltd.

(SLI) offers the better valuation at 6. 5x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Lithium Argentina AG (LAR) a "Buy" — based on 2 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — LAR or LAC or SLI or ALB?

On forward P/E, Albemarle Corporation is actually cheaper at 22.

4x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — LAR or LAC or SLI or ALB?

Over the past 5 years, Lithium Argentina AG (LAR) delivered a total return of +321.

3%, compared to -31. 3% for Lithium Americas Corp. (LAC). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: LAR returned +321. 3% versus ALB's +217. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — LAR or LAC or SLI or ALB?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Lithium Americas Corp.

(LAC) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 42β versus Lithium Argentina AG's 1. 79β — meaning LAR is approximately 26% more volatile than LAC relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Standard Lithium Ltd. (SLI) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 34% for Albemarle Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — LAR or LAC or SLI or ALB?

On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Standard Lithium Ltd.

grew EPS 428. 0% year-over-year, compared to -757. 1% for Lithium Americas Corp.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — LAR or LAC or SLI or ALB?

Lithium Argentina AG (LAR) is the more profitable company, earning 0.

0% net margin versus -9. 9% for Albemarle Corporation — meaning it keeps 0. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ALB leads at 1. 8% versus 0. 0% for SLI. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ALB leads at 13. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is LAR or LAC or SLI or ALB more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, Albemarle Corporation (ALB) trades at 22.

4x forward P/E versus 24. 3x for Lithium Argentina AG — 1. 9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for LAC: 23. 7% to $7. 00.

08

Which pays a better dividend — LAR or LAC or SLI or ALB?

In this comparison, ALB (0.

8% yield) pays a dividend. LAR, LAC, SLI do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

09

Is LAR or LAC or SLI or ALB better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Albemarle Corporation (ALB) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (0.

8% yield, +217. 0% 10Y return). Lithium Argentina AG (LAR) carries a higher beta of 1. 79 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (ALB: +217. 0%, LAR: +321. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between LAR and LAC and SLI and ALB?

Both stocks operate in the Basic Materials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: LAR is a small-cap quality compounder stock; LAC is a small-cap quality compounder stock; SLI is a small-cap deep-value stock; ALB is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. ALB pays a dividend while LAR, LAC, SLI do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

LAR

Quality Business

  • Sector: Basic Materials
  • Market Cap > $100B
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

LAC

Quality Business

  • Sector: Basic Materials
  • Market Cap > $100B
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

SLI

Quality Business

  • Sector: Basic Materials
  • Market Cap > $100B
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

ALB

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Basic Materials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 16%
  • Dividend Yield > 0.5%
Run This Screen

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.