Compare Stocks

2 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

LAZ vs HLI

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
LAZ
Lazard Ltd

Financial - Capital Markets

Financial ServicesNYSE • BM
Market Cap$4.24B
5Y Perf.+67.9%
HLI
Houlihan Lokey, Inc.

Financial - Capital Markets

Financial ServicesNYSE • US
Market Cap$10.31B
5Y Perf.+148.3%

LAZ vs HLI — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
LAZ logoLAZ
HLI logoHLI
IndustryFinancial - Capital MarketsFinancial - Capital Markets
Market Cap$4.24B$10.31B
Revenue (TTM)$3.19B$2.39B
Net Income (TTM)$237M$448M
Gross Margin31.8%38.5%
Operating Margin13.0%21.0%
Forward P/E14.1x19.5x
Total Debt$2.58B$438M
Cash & Equiv.$1.50B$971M

LAZ vs HLILong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

LAZ
HLI
StockMay 20May 26Return
Lazard Ltd (LAZ)100167.9+67.9%
Houlihan Lokey, Inc. (HLI)100248.3+148.3%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: LAZ vs HLI

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: HLI leads in 4 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and profitability and margin quality. Lazard Ltd is the stronger pick specifically for valuation and capital efficiency and dividend income and shareholder returns. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
LAZ
Lazard Ltd
The Banking Pick

LAZ is the clearest fit if your priority is defensive.

  • Beta 1.79, yield 3.9%, current ratio 29.35x
  • Lower P/E (14.1x vs 19.5x)
  • 3.9% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs HLI's 1.6%
Best for: defensive
HLI
Houlihan Lokey, Inc.
The Banking Pick

HLI carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.

  • Dividend streak 7 yrs, beta 0.94, yield 1.6%
  • Rev growth 24.8%, EPS growth 41.6%
  • 6.0% 10Y total return vs LAZ's 94.5%
Best for: income & stability and growth exposure
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthHLI logoHLI24.8% NII/revenue growth vs LAZ's 3.2%
ValueLAZ logoLAZLower P/E (14.1x vs 19.5x)
Quality / MarginsHLI logoHLIEfficiency ratio 0.2% vs LAZ's 0.2% (lower = leaner)
Stability / SafetyHLI logoHLIBeta 0.94 vs LAZ's 1.79, lower leverage
DividendsLAZ logoLAZ3.9% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs HLI's 1.6%
Momentum (1Y)LAZ logoLAZ+16.3% vs HLI's -7.1%
Efficiency (ROA)HLI logoHLIEfficiency ratio 0.2% vs LAZ's 0.2%

LAZ vs HLI — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

LAZLazard Ltd
FY 2025
Financial Advisory Fees
60.3%$1.8B
Asset Management
39.7%$1.2B
HLIHoulihan Lokey, Inc.
FY 2025
Corporate Finance
63.9%$1.5B
Financial Restructuring
22.8%$544M
Financial Advisory Services
13.3%$318M

LAZ vs HLI — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLHLILAGGINGLAZ

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

HLI leads this category, winning 5 of 5 comparable metrics.

LAZ and HLI operate at a comparable scale, with $3.2B and $2.4B in trailing revenue. HLI is the more profitable business, keeping 16.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to LAZ's 7.4%.

MetricLAZ logoLAZLazard LtdHLI logoHLIHoulihan Lokey, I…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$3.2B$2.4B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$384M$591M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$237M$448M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$519M$739M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+31.8%+38.5%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+13.0%+21.0%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+7.4%+16.7%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+15.9%+33.9%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-43.8%+22.3%
HLI leads this category, winning 5 of 5 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

LAZ leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

At 20.8x trailing earnings, LAZ trades at a 19% valuation discount to HLI's 25.8x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, LAZ's 11.8x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than HLI's 18.0x.

MetricLAZ logoLAZLazard LtdHLI logoHLIHoulihan Lokey, I…
Market CapShares × price$4.2B$10.3B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$5.3B$9.8B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS20.78x25.80x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.14.10x19.50x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate1.64x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple11.81x18.01x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue1.33x4.32x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share4.85x4.74x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF8.38x12.75x
LAZ leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

HLI leads this category, winning 7 of 8 comparable metrics.

LAZ delivers a 26.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $27 in annual profit, vs $20 for HLI. HLI carries lower financial leverage with a 0.20x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to LAZ's 2.61x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), HLI scores 7/9 vs LAZ's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricLAZ logoLAZLazard LtdHLI logoHLIHoulihan Lokey, I…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+26.7%+19.5%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+5.2%+11.4%
ROICReturn on invested capital+9.5%+15.5%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+9.5%+20.1%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–957
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage2.61x0.20x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$1.1B-$533M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$1.5B$971M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$2.6B$438M
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense4.74x
HLI leads this category, winning 7 of 8 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

HLI leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in HLI five years ago would be worth $24,223 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $11,940 for LAZ. Over the past 12 months, LAZ leads with a +16.3% total return vs HLI's -7.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors HLI at 21.6% vs LAZ's 21.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricLAZ logoLAZLazard LtdHLI logoHLIHoulihan Lokey, I…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-8.3%-14.5%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+16.3%-7.1%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+76.9%+79.9%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+19.4%+142.2%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+94.5%+599.6%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+21.0%+21.6%
HLI leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — LAZ and HLI each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

HLI is the less volatile stock with a 0.94 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than LAZ's 1.79 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. LAZ currently trades 76.8% from its 52-week high vs HLI's 70.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricLAZ logoLAZLazard LtdHLI logoHLIHoulihan Lokey, I…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5001.79x0.94x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$58.75$211.78
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$38.67$134.41
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+76.8%+70.9%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10041.742.0
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded1.5M562K
Evenly matched — LAZ and HLI each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Evenly matched — LAZ and HLI each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Wall Street rates LAZ as "Buy" and HLI as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 33.2% upside for HLI (target: $200) vs 4.9% for LAZ (target: $47). For income investors, LAZ offers the higher dividend yield at 3.89% vs HLI's 1.60%.

MetricLAZ logoLAZLazard LtdHLI logoHLIHoulihan Lokey, I…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$47.33$200.00
# AnalystsCovering analysts2915
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+3.9%+1.6%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises17
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$1.75$2.41
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap+2.1%+0.5%
Evenly matched — LAZ and HLI each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

HLI leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). LAZ leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.

Best OverallHoulihan Lokey, Inc. (HLI)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

LAZ vs HLI: Frequently Asked Questions

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is LAZ or HLI a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Houlihan Lokey, Inc.

(HLI) is the stronger pick with 24. 8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 3. 2% for Lazard Ltd (LAZ). Lazard Ltd (LAZ) offers the better valuation at 20. 8x trailing P/E (14. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Lazard Ltd (LAZ) a "Buy" — based on 29 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — LAZ or HLI?

On trailing P/E, Lazard Ltd (LAZ) is the cheapest at 20.

8x versus Houlihan Lokey, Inc. at 25. 8x. On forward P/E, Lazard Ltd is actually cheaper at 14. 1x.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — LAZ or HLI?

Over the past 5 years, Houlihan Lokey, Inc.

(HLI) delivered a total return of +142. 2%, compared to +19. 4% for Lazard Ltd (LAZ). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: HLI returned +599. 6% versus LAZ's +94. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — LAZ or HLI?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Houlihan Lokey, Inc.

(HLI) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 94β versus Lazard Ltd's 1. 79β — meaning LAZ is approximately 91% more volatile than HLI relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Houlihan Lokey, Inc. (HLI) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 20% versus 3% for Lazard Ltd — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — LAZ or HLI?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Houlihan Lokey, Inc.

(HLI) is pulling ahead at 24. 8% versus 3. 2% for Lazard Ltd (LAZ). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Houlihan Lokey, Inc. grew EPS 41. 6% year-over-year, compared to -19. 0% for Lazard Ltd. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — LAZ or HLI?

Houlihan Lokey, Inc.

(HLI) is the more profitable company, earning 16. 7% net margin versus 7. 4% for Lazard Ltd — meaning it keeps 16. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: HLI leads at 21. 0% versus 13. 0% for LAZ. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — HLI leads at 38. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is LAZ or HLI more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, Lazard Ltd (LAZ) trades at 14.

1x forward P/E versus 19. 5x for Houlihan Lokey, Inc. — 5. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for HLI: 33. 2% to $200. 00.

08

Which pays a better dividend — LAZ or HLI?

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

Lazard Ltd (LAZ) offers the highest yield at 3. 9%, versus 1. 6% for Houlihan Lokey, Inc. (HLI).

09

Is LAZ or HLI better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Houlihan Lokey, Inc.

(HLI) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 94), 1. 6% yield, +599. 6% 10Y return). Lazard Ltd (LAZ) carries a higher beta of 1. 79 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (HLI: +599. 6%, LAZ: +94. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between LAZ and HLI?

Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: LAZ is a small-cap income-oriented stock; HLI is a mid-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.

Stocks Like

LAZ

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Financial Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 5%
  • Dividend Yield > 1.5%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

HLI

High-Growth Compounder

  • Sector: Financial Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 12%
  • Net Margin > 10%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform LAZ and HLI on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(LAZ: 3.2% · HLI: 24.8%)
Net Margin>
%
(LAZ: 7.4% · HLI: 16.7%)
P/E Ratio<
x
(LAZ: 20.8x · HLI: 25.8x)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.